Study of the Prophecies

24 November 2022 A note on Zacchaeus, the Deaf, the hearing and the Protestants.


In the Gospel the other day and in the Lauds reading a few days ago there was Zacchaeus.

Luke 19:2-10 There was a man named Zacchaeus, a chief tax collector and a rich man.  3 He was trying to see who Jesus was, but he could not because of the crowd, for he was small in stature.  4 So he ran forward and climbed up on a sycamore tree to see him, for he was going to pass that way.  5 And when Jesus came to that place, he looked up and said to him, "Zacchaeus, come down quickly; for I must stay at your house today."  6 And he hastened down and received him with joy.  7 When they saw him, they all murmured, saying, "He has gone to stay with a sinful man."  8 Zacchaeus stood up and said to the Lord, "Lord, I will give half of my goods to the poor; and if I have defrauded anyone of anything, I will repay him four times as much."  9 Jesus said to him, "Today salvation has come to this house, for this man also is a son of Abraham, 10 for the Son of Man has come to seek and to save that which was lost."

This reading can be applied to what I said about the fools. In this case the crowd waiting for the Lord are those who hear (also called Adam) and Zacchaeus who is short in stature and unable from birth (because of his height) to see Him designates the blind, deaf or foolish (also called Eve). But he makes an effort (he climbs a sycamore tree) and manages to see Him and talk to Him. In the encounter with Jesus He says to him "come down quickly", and now He does not refer to that effort or inability as a fool who has already overcome, but He lets Zacchaeus know that he must become humble, he must renounce the ways of the world in which we pursue our own well-being, stand out above others and actually be loved above all things. This is what the Holy Spirit provokes in us, or simply bringing us closer to God; to begin with, to realise what we are: sinners, but it also provokes a reaction in Zacchaeus, he gives half of his goods to the poor (he stops thinking only of himself). In other words, the Holy Spirit provokes a change in us that will bring about the emergence of works. If there are no works, this one will be lost. It is after this intention to give that Jesus says to him: salvation has come to this house (the Spirit has come to his being).

The works thing goes for the Protestants, the effort thing for the fools, although those who listen also went to wait and to gather surrounded by crowds to see the Lord; they also make an effort, although they do it with contentment and knowing what they are going to. Not so Zacchaeus who seems to do it out of curiosity, one cannot imagine Zacchaeus praising and cheering as he climbs the sycamore tree with effort; it was when he saw that Jesus loves him that he was converted (because he was a tax collector he was hated by his compatriots).

All this I said to one of my sons one day when this same reading from Zacchaeus came up: The crowd are the brothers who go to the community and sing joyfully at the celebrations. You are Zacchaeus who does not see the Lord, so you must make an effort and you must attend the celebrations of your own free will, seeking to see him, not because I tell you to, for then you will not do it for yourself but for me, and your freedom will not work. God will never force us to love Him; precisely because He loves us. Slavery is contrary to love and God cannot deny Himself.
That will be his effort. For in my experience I have found that God rewards our efforts (in a didactic way it seems), by giving a state of grace. And the Spirit is also lost when we sin, perhaps also to teach us, before the end. At other times He acts directly in history with things that are difficult and even painful for the world, but in any case He always teaches us. Why? Because He loves us.

5 January 2023. The Spiritual Testament of Benedict XVI (may he rest in Peace).


I think there are few people in the world more knowledgeable about theology. I have not read his work, only part of his spiritual testament, but that must be so from what they say about him.
However, something in that testament I think can lead to confusion, and it is precisely because in it he warns about the irrefutable conclusions to be reached by historical research (exegesis of Holy Scripture):

Stand firm in the faith, do not let yourselves be confused! It often seems as if science - the natural sciences on the one hand and historical research (especially the exegesis of Sacred Scripture) on the other - are capable of offering irrefutable results at odds with the Catholic faith.

Two apparently very different things united in the same sentence (science and exegesis of Holy Scripture). Well, what is revealed in this essay is of such significance that it must have reached Benedict's ears; it is foolish to deny it, in fact, I know that the essay has already reached the Vatican. For this reason, it is possible that these words are a warning to what is revealed here, since today the enemies of the Church are in the world and its distractions, not even the will of men is united to follow some current as it once was with the Lutherans; God, the metaphysical and the spiritual are directly despised. Thus, it does not fit that this warning about "irrefutable results on exegesis" refers to them. Nor, as I say, does it fit in very well with the advances in science, for they are somewhat different fields.
It might be possible that this warning refers to the exegesis of impossible biblical events such as, for example, "The sun stood still at Gibeon", but neither that nor miracles in general have ever deterred us Catholics. Perhaps then he refers to those logical explanations that Protestants give to some miracles (the opening of the waters of the Red Sea by periodic seasonal winds), but that these logical explanations coexist with miracles, do not really attack our faith and are not new to our time. So, I can only think that those "irrefutable results" on exegesis are the ones revealed here. You may think I am like the puny little dwarf who grumpily shouts at a giant by suggesting that it is what is revealed here that troubled Benedict. OK, I am that little dwarf, but the secrets that have come to light here are enough to worry many. In any case, whether or not this exegesis is the object of the statement, it is important to clarify a few things so that we do not get confused.
Let us separate ourselves a little from science (which for me can perfectly coexist with faith), to speak of the exegesis of the Scriptures. To speak of exegesis in this way is to take away the value of the words of the Bible, no more and no less, since this in itself is the study of these words. It is like saying "let us ignore the road signs that lead us to our destination". We can be cautious about science and always place it below God (not apart), for we know that the world is ephemeral and that God made it ordered and bound to the standards He designed for it; the fulfilment of these being a perfect daily blessing to His name. But how can we deny the study of God's word? Does not a son examine his father's commands before he does them, to make sure that he has understood them aright? Does not faith come by the foolishness of preaching, as St. Paul said? And what do we preach but the word of God which comes to us from the Scriptures?
But does what is written here really disagree (not say against) with the Catholic faith? "irrefutable results at odds with the Catholic faith". For me there is no such disagreement, except for acknowledging those other ways of God and perhaps acknowledging that Jesus has created (Son) and divine part also in heaven, not just on earth, for He is the first created and the One through whom flows, in whom Lives, and who maintains, the exact Essence of God. The fact that he then speaks of the Church as the body of God: "Jesus Christ is truly the way, the truth and the life, and the Church, with all her inadequacies, is truly his body", makes me think that Benedict found it difficult to accept that other religions could have been articulated as part of that body.  

Eph 5:21-23 Be submissive to one another in the fear of Christ: 22 Wives to their husbands, as to the Lord, 23 For the husband is the head of the wife, even as Christ is the head of the church, the saviour of the body.

Think of Jesus Christ, do we not know for certain that he is the saviour of mankind, not just of Christians? I believe that this is recognised by the Church, and we know that, thanks to Him, even non-Christians who do good can attain salvation. And to continue with the metaphor, is a foot to have knowledge of the head? Is it not only the head that thinks? The foot gets the food, the blood, the life, but it does not really know where it comes from. If it could, it would pray every day that this life would continue to come to it through its veins and that "that" which moves it would not lead it over rocky and painful terrain. And since, as the letter to the Ephesians says, the head is the saviour of the body, is not that other religion guided by mercy also part of the body that Jesus Christ saves? Let us not pretend to be like the neck that tells the head which way to look, let us accept the orders given to us by the head and be a neck (or body or whatever) subject to its orders. And these orders do not come to us through electrical impulses, but through the Scriptures.
To say that we disregard the "irrefutable results" to which the Exegesis of the Scriptures leads, is like crouching in a corner closing our eyes tightly shut, with our fingers in our ears, waiting for the God-driven hurricane to pass.
He says:

I have lived through the transformations of the natural sciences for a long time now, and I have seen how, on the contrary, apparent certainties against faith have vanished, proving to be not science, but philosophical interpretations that only seem to be the province of science. For sixty years I have been following the path of theology, especially of the biblical sciences, and with the succession of different generations, I have seen theses that seemed immovable collapse and turn out to be mere hypotheses: the liberal generation (Harnack, Jülicher, etc.), the existentialist generation (Bultmann, etc.), the Marxist generation. I have seen and I see how out of the confusion of hypotheses the reasonableness of faith has emerged and is emerging again.

Well, all this is true, but none of those mentioned, I believe, were founded on Exegesis or the Word of God. I say this because earlier he named them together as part of the same problem (irrefutable conclusions from exegesis/science). So, even though he did not name examples of trends grounded in exegesis, let us consider that this temporality he also assigns to what is revealed here (in fact, I suspect it was his major concern since little has changed lately in terms of the relationship between the Christian and science however much science has advanced). 
Well, in this regard we should know that the Exegesis shown here has been done, of course, with the Word of God, but, first and foremost, superimposed on the knowledge we have of God. To say that He cannot blame us for a sin that we (Adam and Eve) did not commit, is simply to know that He cannot be unjust, He cannot deny Himself. This is not something temporary, this is eternal as God Himself is eternal. It is precisely the time that has elapsed from the writing of what is here until it has been revealed that gives it the importance it has, for how could it have been written by men, if no one knew what they were writing about and they were all writing about the same thing? Time, which is, as Benedict says, what destroys these scientific/philosophical/exegetical tendencies (?), is precisely what gives strength to what is revealed here and constitutes it as the unequivocal work of God.

Isa 48:3-9 I have long ago declared the former things, they came out of my mouth, and I made them known; suddenly I did them, and they came to pass.  4 For I knew how stubborn thou art: thou hast a bar of iron for thy neck, and thy face is brass.  5 Therefore I told you of old, and before they came to pass I made them known to you, lest you should say, "My idol made them, my statue, my molten image commanded it."  6 You have heard all this vision: do you not know it? For right now I tell you new things, secrets you did not know; 7 things created now, not before, things to day, which you did not hear, lest you say, "I knew them already."  8 You neither heard them nor did them, nor was your ear opened beforehand, for I know full well that you are perfidious and are called rebellious from your mother's womb.  9 For my name's sake I delayed my anger, for the sake of my praise I restrained myself, lest I should pluck thee up.

Well, Benedict was an intelligent and erudite man who is a thousand times my equal in practically every respect, yet he who studies in detail with a telescope a distant planet, may not realise the wonders on the one beside it, even if he consciously knows that it is bathed in the light of the same sun.    
He has been lucky because he resigned before he knew all that was revealed. I remember that I sent him the essay when it was half written, along with two other copies, one for Pope Francis and a third for another Vatican important person; this was shortly after he resigned. At the time, I was a bit short of money, so I only had enough to send one of the three certified books, the rest as normal mail. I sent it in a whistle, whistle, whistle, but praying an Our Father and I ended up with Benedict's. So it was the only one I sent certified (I was aware that it would be received by some secretary, but I knew that sooner or later it would get to them), and it turns out that he has been the most critical (as far as I know). Lord knows how He does things.
I say that he has been lucky because the pastors, especially those in charge, and I am not only referring to the hierarchy of the Church, but in general to those in charge of many, have a direct responsibility for what has been revealed. Oh friend, you who were beating your chest saying that you were a sinner, but deep down you thought you had one foot already in heaven...! Well, things have gone awry, because the Lord is asking you to act; I sincerely don't think you are risking your damnation in this (I think), but maybe the position of the place where we end up is altered... We are not in a boring and anodyne life; although we are almost always tempted by the same sins, every day these temptations come to us in different situations. We must be alert, alive and quick. Indeed these are irrefutable conclusions reached by the exegesis revealed here, act accordingly, and if in doubt, consult the Bible. You know how. You are gambling a lot; lest it be too late and they end up reproaching you, for you have been warned and you do not act.

8 July 2023 A Dark Omen.

12 October 2023 Confirming Dark omens

Do you think it was a coincidence that he ended the tests on the 7th and Hamas attacked Israel on the 8th? (! it seems to have started on the 7th. When I uploaded it, in the early hours of the morning I wasn't up to date. In case there is any doubt, it was on the 27th of September that I published the 3 1/2 times in Jesus Christ and on the 7th of the morning I published it all updated and laid out).. Sure, it could be a coincidence, just as it could be a coincidence the recent build-up of North Korean troops in front of South Korea, which in turn, could be just an attempt by the dictator there to help his colleague Putin (psychopath, genocidal, dictator, and enemy of his own people), by distracting the US, or it could be a real attack. But maybe, maybe this is happening now not by chance but in accordance with everything said here. I warned you three months ago (commentary “A dark omen”) that the Lord would crush the world if the Pope did not make public what he himself already knows by following, in one way or another, this website with what is revealed here. And this prediction is not something I have pulled out of my sleeve as many do to give themselves notoriety, it is because the revelation, precisely now, of our history lived in those 3 ½ times, lived from heaven, from our betrayal there, gives meaning to the entire Bible and the mere fact that this secret has remained hidden for thousands of years until today, is mathematical proof (also for fools, or various atheists) that God was the one who hid it and tells us about the end of the world, today, precisely now.
Because it is very difficult, not to say impossible, to have hidden this until now; almost as difficult as hiding 1500 terrorists armed to the teeth, the preparation of 4500 missiles, or the many preparations with international ramifications included, for the invasion of Israel. And hiding it from right under their noses, from none other than Mossad, Israeli intelligence (the best in the world by all accounts). Why did this happen? The Lord warns us. It is not that He desires the invasion of Israel, nor the deaths of all those innocent people, nor that of the terrorists who have died full of hatred, which will lead them headlong into hell, for hatred is the devil's favourite child; it is to fulfil His warning:   

Matt 24:6-14 You will also hear of wars and rumours of wars. Beware, do not be alarmed! For that is necessary to come to pass, but it is not yet the end. 7 For nation will rise against nation and kingdom against kingdom, and there will be famines and earthquakes in various places. 8 All this will be the beginning of birth pains. 9 "Then they will hand you over to torture and kill you, and you will be hated by all nations for my name's sake. 10 Then many will be scandalised and will betray and hate one another. 11 Many false prophets will arise and deceive many. 12 And as iniquity will increase more and more, the love of many will grow cold. 13 But he who endures to the end will be saved. 14 "This good news of the kingdom will be proclaimed in the whole world as a witness to all nations. And then the end will come.

This, which is set at the end of time, says that it is necessary for the wars prior to this end to happen. Why for God can this be necessary? Because only these signs will bow the neck of our friend Paco with the key and his gang. Or are wars necessary for God? No. But He has given us freedom, also to Peter on whom it depends to open those doors to the fools of the world. Yet Peter stubbornly behaves like the one who kept his ring as his personal treasure. And it is not a treasure for him and his (the practising Catholics), it is in fact a responsibility, a key given to him to use now to open those doors to all those who will soon panic and will not know where to go if those doors are not opened now. That is his mission. I put an added note to the last commentary that referred to those keys in the plural ("I will give you the keys to the Kingdom of Heaven" Mt 16:19), because it is not just one way, or one door but several as there are several ways set by God to get to heaven. What is revealed in these essays opens the door to all faithless abortions, who only understand reason. And this is true of all paths, for in all there are healthy, though sinners, and abortions or miscarriages, with birth deficiencies that prevent them from seeing God (such is justice by our different involvement in treachery in heaven).
As a hope we are left with the hope that after (or during, he does not specify) these wars (14) "this Good News of the Kingdom will be proclaimed in the whole world as a witness to the nations and then the end will come". Note that it is also Matthew who speaks to us of the Kingdom of Heaven in the parables describing our betrayal from heaven (3 ½ Times in Jesus Christ), i.e. he seems to be referring to the fact that it is this secret of the 3 ½ Times from the Kingdom of Heaven that will be proclaimed: "this Good News of the Kingdom will be proclaimed in the whole world" = This in particular about the Kingdom will be proclaimed. Although the Good News is sometimes translated as "Gospel", this is the actual translation in several bibles (this is the Jerusalem one) and in Greek as well.

 

9 July 2024. Hello Again.


On 8 December 23 a word came to me when I was asking the Lord if I should publish something, which was to tell me to wait 7 months and then shout. Well, as shouting can be understood as praying, talking around here and so many other things, I do what is in my power.

So today only two issues.

One is of a practical nature.
In my pride I gave you advice on how to receive the Holy Spirit, comparing some movement systems with other diocesan ones, all within the Church. So today I continue in this pride to give you one more piece of advice, do not be proud and listen to it, even if it comes to you from below.
It is very important to fight against bad thoughts. The fact that they are minor sins can cause us not to give them importance or to consent to them because of this condition. I advise you, after confession, to fight firmly against these, as the first battle barrier, because evil thoughts, which are usually of lust or judgement towards others, cause the slow seeping of the Holy Spirit from our souls. When we succeed, the opposite happens, the Holy Spirit gradually accumulates ("God gives it to his friends while they sleep", or something like that is written there) and when we have some of the Spirit it helps us to fight against the fattest sins.

Another is for me essential and speaks to the root of your evil.
Every day you pastors, in general, persist in insulting God with impudence. Right under His nose, since you are supposed to be facing Him, you spit on Him as unjust. You claim that we were expelled from Eden because of the sin of others than us (Adam and Eve), and so you teach it. You do not tell them the truth, for Adam and Eve represent us, for it was our personal sin that emptied us of God in heaven; that is the death that Jesus Christ destroys for all men, a death that has already occurred in all of us. He does not create miscarriages, He created us full and perfect in heaven, we come here dead because of our betrayal, our sin. What is even worse, you curse the Lord and not in something light, but in its very foundation. Injustice is unloving to one of the judged parties and He is Love. So much so, that He only because of the doubt that He might seem unjust was forced to make a new nature man in order to save us, separated from the demons, those who were our brothers, who hated God. He was able to give His firstborn Son to save us without any suspicion of injustice. The one who validated the first heavenly nature, by which everything was created, was the only one who could validate the new human nature in order to make it capable of receiving God, for by making it all new it was freed from any righteousness. But you, even though you know that He is the Righteous One par excellence, stubbornly call Him unjust, and not only that, you ascribe to Him a misdeed that condemned billions of people to death and hell, for you base the departure from Eden on an injustice to all mankind, since only Adam and Eve should have been punished according to your understanding.

And now there is no more ignorance. You cannot blame your stubborn sin on the fact that those stultified brains that guide your steps, cannot look beyond the path marked by your many ancestors, because it is as obvious as adding 1+1+1. You insist on placing God in the shadows, where the wicked unjust, when He is the source of Justice and Law. If it is unforgivable to blaspheme against the Holy Spirit, what will become of you who continually blaspheme against the Father? Quietly, dutifully, oratorically, you place yourselves on your pedestals to deceive the rest, teaching that God is the most evil and unjust Being in history, for He condemned all mankind for the sin of two; as if He were an evil Genie of the lamp who will confuse our desires in order to harm us. You are disgusting and your testimony condemns you. You dedicate yourselves to put pots under the leaks: if a bishop has said such and such, if a priest has done this, let's take care of the media, be quiet, let's not scandalise! Hypocrites. You tell the faithful not to look at the world, but at heaven, and you can only look at the structure that supports you, burying any change in piles of studies and steps. But this is not to study, it is as obvious as that we need to breathe to live and the Holy Spirit to Live in capital letters: God is Love, is Justice and is Right.

You have other ways of insulting God by calling Him unjust (i.e., evil, for heaven is reserved for the just and hell for the unjust). When you say that only your religion is set by Him to get you to heaven, you are calling Him unjust. You think that in the family you are the favourite son, that the father does not take care of the education of your brothers. You think that it is only what you study that will get you to heaven, so again you make your father unjust who despises the rest of his children. In fact, you make him cruel and heartless when you see him capable of closing the way for others, of delivering them to roads that lead to hell. Is not the religion of each one determined by the place where we are born? All religions guided by mercy reach God and are made for the different sizes of our souls, for we are different from the first death in heaven. Thicker hoses fill larger containers, a child is not taught the same as an adult, and so on. However, all parallel in the good direction, mercy.
The latter is worse for the Muslim shepherds, the Imams. For me, they must have been like children in heaven, because children are very easy to fanaticise, and unfortunately in both senses, good and bad. They are capable of the best and the worst, even confusing those verses that speak of fighting the infidel with hatred of their brothers. Of course only the Muslim path is to be contemplated by the Muslim, as the Christian path is to be contemplated by the Christian, and that is why in all religions we are warned that the path that is not ours leads to perdition, because it is so for us, but not for the one whose size is right on that other path. If your Father is merciful, will he teach you mercy or hatred? If your Father is just, will he commit injustice? These are truisms that you stubbornly deny like aborted souls incapable of feeling the love of God. In this all shepherds of all walks of life are equal.

Even worse are the Israelites. The people chosen by God to show us with their story, the story we each had from heaven. They stood by and watched their temple being built, making the structure, and when the Word came inside, they decided to stay outside, marvelling at how God chose them to create his marvellous temple there. It weighs heavily on me, because I am very fond of them. I understand that the land they are on was given to them by God, there is no better Notary than Him to register a piece of land. And I put myself in their shoes: it must not be easy to live surrounded by those who think that those who are unfaithful to their religion should die. Even so, it is mercy that must guide us, even in territorial conflicts, everything in the right measure and always guided by mercy. They are wrong in the most important thing, because also the Muslims have their path that leads to Eden, but the Israelites have been left in a break in the road and now they will have to take a leap to take the Christian path because it is the one that God has put for them.
It is only for this that I am writing today, to remind you shepherds how despicable you are, for after making the obvious present to you, you continue to proclaim your outbursts against the Lord my God, and I mean my God. Or does not the one who consciously blasphemes against Him day after day, calling Him unjust evil, put himself in the place of the enemy?
You are determined not to drink the cup of Jeremiah's wine which the Lord has brought to you, and it is killing you little by little, and your flocks as well.

14 July 2024 Recapitulate all things in heaven and earth.

Blessed be God, the Father of our Lord Jesus Christ, who has blessed us in Christ with every spiritual blessing in heaven. He chose us in Christ before the foundation of the world to be holy and blameless before him in love. He has destined us through Jesus Christ, according to the good pleasure of his will, to be his children, to the praise of the glory of his grace, which he has so generously bestowed on us in the Beloved. In him, through his blood, we have redemption, the forgiveness of sins, according to the riches of the grace which in his wisdom and prudence he has lavished on us, making known to us the mystery of his will: the plan which he had planned to bring about through Christ, in the fullness of time: to recapitulate in Christ all things in heaven and on earth.

Today I went to a beautiful church to hear mass. It was the Church of San Pablo, which is in a quiet area of Malaga. I was fascinated by how bright it was. The parish priest, moreover, had kindly placed some huge fans that allowed the big doors to be open, which let in even more light. The soft recliners have really enchanted me. You have to admit that the parish priest there is doing a good job.

However, in his homily, which focused on all the good that we Christians have to announce to the rest of mankind, he said something like: God also recapitulates the things of heaven and earth, because the Universe together with us is His creation.

Well, this, as it stands, is not nonsense, but it is a far cry from what those words mean. What happens when we don't know the other side of something is that we often guess, which leads to funny results. In fact, many entertainment games consist of hiding some of the information so that guessing brings out the biggest nonsense and makes us laugh. The priests do not see our story in heaven. They think that God has created man as an abortion empty of God, when it is not so, we arrive here empty of God because of our betrayal and only after the Passion can we receive Him. The Church gives this example to non-believers: your life is like a bird that enters through one window and leaves through the other, alluding to the fact that they do not know where they come from and where they are going. However, they themselves do not really know where they come from, they only see one side of the coin, which leads them to say enormous blasphemies, such as that God condemned humanity for the sin of two, making it evil and unjust.

That Jesus Christ recapitulates the things of heaven and earth means that he remakes the things of heaven on earth. That is to say, he makes everything new in man's nature in order to save our ill-fated heavenly nature. God is bound by Justice, He could not save us for free for our betrayal in heaven, without giving explanations to those who did not betray and, above all, to those He would leave unsaved: the demons who hated Him, who asked for our same destiny by branding us as traitors and making us equal to them. Let us remember, that our sin was minor, some there we rose up out of love for the Eve who convinced us, yet the demons shield themselves from us and God cannot even seem to be unjust.

That Christ is made the head of heaven and earth, means that the first created was He in heaven, and He kept the Essence of God integrated. By Him the rest of the heavenly creatures were made (the head of heaven). Since He was the only one who could validate a new Man structure that could maintain God, without anyone denouncing God as unjust, He was the one who did it (what fallen angel would denounce Jesus Christ for being the validating mould of a new Man nature, if He Himself was the validating mould by which the angels themselves were created). Thus, until the Passion, man could not receive God. Only a few envoys and prophets are able to receive the Spirit before the Passion. That is why He descends to Sheol for the righteous, because before the Passion they could not ascend to heaven without the Holy Spirit.

But God does not create the universe without a plan. After the betrayal and the claim of the demons to our fate, Jesus Christ offers Himself already in heaven. This is God's plan to save us. Through Jesus Christ the nature Man is created and the Universe too, as a tool for our salvation within our freedom, within righteousness (the head of the earth).

When it says: He chose us in Christ before the foundation of the world, it is just as it is, there is no need to imagine God thinking of us in heaven, stretching mentally into eons of time to imagine our being. We were already in heaven, and we were already differentiated (or chosen), the "Adam" who betrayed out of love, the "Eves" who betrayed out of greed, and the "serpent" demons who hated.

It is very sad to see people who consecrate their lives to God going around beating around the bush. It is far from the first time I have heard divinations, especially with readings that are difficult to understand from the world. There are priests more daring than this one, who say barbarities. I insist, it is very sad, especially when they consider God evil and unjust, capable of condemning humanity for the sin of two. God wanted to keep all this hidden until now, but even St. Paul, without knowing it, already made it clear in writing by the Holy Spirit.

20 July 2024 God Mercy, Justice, Right.(!)


Once upon a time...

Once upon a time there was a Great Magician who created two people and placed them in a paradise. This Magician already had in mind to create all mankind, so much so that he already knew each one of them (so it was written), whom he would then make independent of each other, although he would place them little by little in paradise within families.
But it happened that the first two disobeyed him and he said: "Ha, ha, ha!
Ha, Ha, Ha! Because you have not listened to me, now all those whom I was going to create in paradise will go condemned into the world. Because of you, every child, man, woman, old man, righteous, unrighteous will go into the world and suffer their hardships. And so will you two repent for having disobeyed me!

So unjust and wicked was the Magician, that by taking revenge on those two and punishing them, he condemned mankind as a whole.
This is what the priests teach today; that we are subjected under the power of an unjust, evil and somewhat puerile god. And since they know that God cannot deny Himself, cannot be unjust, they openly and consciously blaspheme, deceiving those who want to know God.
Since this is so, since they are aware of this lie which they proclaim, their integrity is gradually corrupted. For by ignoring and lying about the root and the Essence of God, they only undo their own foundation of Being.
Today in the Office of Readings it said in the Responsory:

Mal 4:5-6 Behold, I will send you Elijah the prophet before the day of the LORD comes, a great and dreadful day.(6) He will turn the hearts of the fathers to the children, and the hearts of the children to their fathers, lest I come and smite the earth with a curse.

I have already said it several times, we must know what the word father and son means to us. Father is where we came from, who we were in heaven. Son is what is left of us on earth. In several passages it is perfectly explained, and I have been expounding them, (now I am not going to look them up again... see NOTE 1), and here again it is fulfilled. So today this word is indeed fulfilled, for to turn the hearts of the fathers to the children and vice versa, is to know that we were already in heaven and it was our personal sin that condemned us; it is to recognise that God is just, of course; it is to look at ourselves and feel ourselves, and our own sin, in heaven; and, therefore, to recognise that we are the fruit of this sin. Recovered, gathered, redeemed into a new nature by the only One who in righteousness could redeem us by making us all new, as He did once in heaven, being a mould of the heavenly nature (the angels), is a mould of the new nature man capable of containing the Holy Spirit, God; He was the first created by whom all things were created, in heaven and on earth.
The most worrying thing is what it says at the end: "lest I come and smite the earth with a curse". In other words, shepherds, you can now drink with pleasure from the cup of Jeremiah's wine that I have brought you, for it is no longer dark omens that I personally announced to you because you did not drink the cup, but it was written.
On the second part of the responsory:

John will be great in the sight of the Lord, and he will go before him in the Spirit and power of Elijah....

You should see "The prophet who is to come" which is linked to all this.

Also "Out of the North I will raise up a man" which is linked to all this.

As always everything fits together millimetrically, from Law, from Justice, from logic. Only you stand on a lie that deeply insults God and if you continue in this way you will succeed, as the Word warns, that God will curse the Earth and you personally.

3 August 2024 You are Interfering with His Plans.

And you would think that after this discovery the Vatican is in an uproar,
that the sandals of restless cardinals clatter with scandalous echoes augmented by the lofty halls there,
that the stoles fly on the backs of bishops unable to reach them to find rest,
that they have replaced the soles of everyone who runs there with rubber soles to prevent dangerous skidding....

Yes, that is what it should be, but it is not. And since the Lord knows you, since you were with Him in heaven, He has allowed you to base all your knowledge on a lie, so that today you are forced to act by moving that stone that supported you. How else can you make your stultified minds move? How else can you make an elephant move that carries another elephant, that carries another elephant, that carries another elephant...? Very easy, put fire underneath and you will see how they all start to run. And that's how you were all placed when the Lord moved the first block, with the flames of hell licking your bodies, waiting anxiously to pick you up. From being the cream of the crop of the Lord you have been left as huge Blasphemers who do not even know the most serious foundation of God, Justice. For you blaspheme every time you say that He expelled mankind from Eden for the sin of two.

But as I said, He has done so because He knows you. He has guided you with the Holy Spirit, but He has left this part that is at the very base for today, near the end, to place it. And now you will have to move, you have no other choice, and when you recognise that God cannot be unjust and that it was our own sin that drove us out of heaven, perhaps later you will come to the conclusion that He does not create abortions for His own amusement, for He is not cruel, but it was our sin that emptied us and through which we lost our original nature. You will see the Justice why Jesus Christ had to become man: in order to validate, or make fit, the man nature. Of course, Jesus Christ in heaven was not a man, or did you think that He, the 3rd person of God, in heaven was also a little lower than the angels (Hebrews 2:7-18)? He takes the form of man to validate it; like one who tries on a diving suit to check that it works well and to give the official certificate that allows to use that model, of that make, in the whole ocean; and to do so He had to test it in extreme love, because there was a captious inspector there who was eager to avoid giving the certificate, he was the devil, and he put tests and more tests of pain on Jesus Christ so that as man He would hate those who put them on Him; but Jesus lovingly and silently got it for us. Before this validation, the human body only served to hold the swill that remained of us after the betrayal of heaven, and to hold it for the time necessary to prove our righteousness, which in itself was a gift from God. But even if we were righteous, we could not receive the Holy Spirit, nor return to heaven, we needed the only one who could validate man, in order to receive God, without committing injustice, to do so. Since the passion, these human bodies can keep us and God together, and get to heaven. And this is so because only the validator of the original nature (the firstborn who pleased God, and by whom the heavenly creatures were created), could validate a new nature without any angel claiming God to commit injustice. Well, that is what the devil did when he found out that God was going to make a nature for all of us who betrayed God out of love for our Eve, which she did betray out of greed convinced by the demons who also hated her. We could no longer remain in our original nature, for if God had left us there, He would also have had to leave the demons so as not to appear unjust to them. God is just and it was our sin that drove us out of heaven.

That is how deceitful, lying and wicked the devil was, calling God unjust to achieve his purpose. You, however, call Him unjust every day because you believe it. You believe that He can be unjust and drive us out of Eden for the sin of one (or two, Eve was the first to pick the fruit). And this is far worse than what the devil did, for the devil did it to try to save himself. Do not think that the Lord has revealed all this to you, beginning with the foundations of our sin, just for the sake of a little posturing. He has revealed it to you with all the consequences, and has placed you above the devil himself in this sin. I thought that such a thing would not affect a career dedicated to God like yours, but I realise more and more that it is a fundamental sin, affecting your very primal being. Just as good is imprinted in the souls of all men, of whatever religion (iunaturalism and all that), you should know that God cannot be unjust. I saw a video of a hippopotamus (years ago, before AI) taking pity on a fawn that had been bitten on the leg by a crocodile and was still attacking it. The hippopotamus, after a moment's thought, stepped on the crocodile and then, when the crocodile ran away as best it could, tried to pull the fawn out of the river with its snout. Even a beast showed mercy, where does that hippopotamus leave so many men without mercy?

You faithfully follow the devil, with the aggravating factor that he was doing it to save his own skin, but not you. Where does that leave you? Everything points to hell. God used to hide this from you in order to reveal it to you today, i.e. He is counting on you to make this public. You are interfering with His plans when you stand around looking at your hard-earned luxurious chasubles. Your brains are asleep amidst all this pomposity and think only of safeguarding your position. Do you not realise that now, even the old, once faithful Christian women think that their daughters should take up with someone else if she has not found "happiness" with her first husband? Can't you see that there are less and less truly faithful (this also happens in Islam, with the aggravating factor that many of those who are passionate about God there, exchange mercy for hatred towards the "infidel"). That even in Christian communities only children are added now, and all this has changed in just a few years. You ask the Holy Spirit and put yourselves in His hands with the conviction that He will solve it. In truth you are like the guy in the joke (bad as hell, but very representative):

A man is cut off by a great flood. A boat arrives and offers to take him, but he says: No, I trust in the Lord, I know he will save me... Go, go... Then an outboard boat arrives and also offers to take him, but he puts himself in the Lord's hands and waits for him to be rescued. Finally, a helicopter came by and invited him to come up, but he replied that he had blind faith that God would save him. Finally he died. In heaven, he asks God why didn't you come to save me, I waited for you, and He answers, "What do you mean, no? First I sent you a boat, then a boat and finally a helicopter?

God has already revealed the knowledge that can save all men, even atheists, and you remain praying for the solution when in reality it is right in front of you and you are interfering with His plans by not using it.
Although I have taught you the obvious in the scriptures, you do nothing. Though you have seen that God left it written before it happened, you do nothing. Though you have seen that He did it for thousands of years by establishing a thread that is impossible for man to create artificially, you do nothing; indeed, some say: let us wait for a while, for time leaves everything in its place as did the late Ratzinger, whose spiritual testament I have already commented on. Fools, thousands of years have already passed and God will never become unjust, impossible.
I understand that you can't ask for pears from an elm tree. Don't change the concept of Jesus Christ if you don't want to. You think He was always man, so keep on thinking so. Then go on thinking so; that He cannot have a created and divine nature already in heaven; that He is not God's creation since He is one of the three persons? Well, think so, whatever, but do not hide our origin from heaven; the impossibility for God to impute to us the sin of others than ourselves. When you show that to the world, it will be seen how the Lord has written in the key of the 3 ½ times the whole Bible. Our history will be seen from heaven as represented by the history of Israel. All will be understood with logic and with evidence from the world, for no one could hide all this for thousands of years, written by different peoples, who wrote unknowingly about the same thing.
You know that by teaching what you teach about the sin of Adam and Eve in heaven, you push men to say: "If God existed, he would not allow the suffering of the world...". For how can you think of a God who would cast you out of heaven for the sin of another? To cast you into the suffering and despair of the world? If it is not conceivable, it is easier to deny it. But it is easy to understand a God who wants to save us because we personally have emptied ourselves and filled ourselves with death.

12 August 2024 Sins that affect our primordial being.


You will say that this is a strange thing, but no, there are sins that affect our primordial being and therefore they are unforgivable. The clearest case identified and warned by Jesus Christ is the blasphemy against the Holy Spirit. This, as Jesus says, is unforgivable Matthew 12:31-32.
To understand this explanation you should see, above at least, the 3 ½ Times present throughout the Bible practically. Also our fall from heaven described in the 10 plagues and it would also not hurt to check the coincidence of continually repeated names in the Bible that represent the same thing.
A sin that affects our primordial being is the one that would determine our positioning after the betrayal of heaven. That is, since the demons, angels like the others, hated God, they placed themselves on a side or in a position opposed to God. Those who coveted mentioned as "Eve" also positioned themselves so that in the world they would be the fools and would not be listed in the book of Life. And finally the "Adam" who fall for the love of these "Evas". In fact, the sin of the demons was against the Holy Spirit, for they wanted to take more to become as great as God. The Holy Spirit paradoxically, became for them the idol to covet, also for the Eves. All these decisions we made in heaven placed us in one place or another, on one side or another. This is also determined by the number of the Beast that comes from removing from the perfect 777 (us together with God in heaven) the number of 111, that is to say, removing God the Trinity, and we are left with 666 that represents the Adam, the Eve and the demons in the world. Thus, some have the mark on their hands by action (the Eves, deaf) and others on their foreheads, by thought, the Adams. Everything determines these groups since the betrayal in heaven, groups that are continuously repeated in the Bible with different names.

However, even on earth there are certain circumstances that can bypass the whole process of the world that envelops us and hides God from us, causing our soul to declare itself directly guilty, renouncing the opportunity that God gives us through this veiled Universe. It is a declaration of such depth that it emanates from our soul, going through the circumstances that surround us and having the same effect as if we had made it before going down to the world, just at the moment of betrayal when we were next to God.

These circumstances have to do with faith or knowledge of God. Rather, with our state in which we were left after the betrayal of heaven. That is to say, this unforgivable sin can only occur in those who have ears, in the Adams, for only these can blaspheme against the Holy Spirit, the deaf will blaspheme against God or against Jesus Christ. He who does not know, does not speak of the interior or of the Essence of God, of the Holy Spirit, he speaks of the exterior, of what he knows superficially because he has heard it mentioned, but since he does not believe, he thinks it is nothing and only blasphemes with the intention of harming those who believe. In any case, these never, as far as I have heard, blaspheme against the Spirit but against God.

However, as he said, those who have ears can blaspheme against the Holy Spirit even without intending to attack him directly.

24 But when the Pharisees heard it, they said, "This man casts out demons only by Beelzebul, the Prince of demons." 
...
31 Therefore I say unto you, All manner of sin and blasphemy shall be forgiven unto men: but blasphemy against the Spirit shall not be forgiven unto them. 32 And whosoever shall speak against the Son of man, it shall be forgiven him: but whosoever shall speak against the Holy Ghost, it shall not be forgiven him, neither in this world, nor in the next.

These Pharisees did not intend to blaspheme against the Holy Spirit, but to criticize Jesus Christ, however, they ended up blaspheming against the Spirit, for they attacked the very Essence of Jesus Christ, the Holy Spirit Himself.

So, yes, there are sins that affect our primordial being and you, the Vatican Hierarchy, are committing an equally grave, unforgivable one. For you blaspheme against the very Essence of God: Justice. You say that God is Just because you have read it in the bible, however, you do not believe it because you think that He has punished all humanity for the sin of two. You believe that your guilt is linked to man's nature, but that it is not really your fault. That God created a defective Nature, or that, in any case, two were able to break Human Nature completely, making God a bungler who created a nature so fragile that it could not withstand even the first two who used it. And of course, in any case, the fault was not yours, it was not your personal sin, but of this defective Human Nature. Not even a mediocre engineer would create a vehicle that would break definitively due to a bad use, and if he did, he would correct the model or create a new one, he would not condemn the rest of the users to use that vehicle off the roads, in the jungle. This, applied to God, would also be counted as injustice to the rest of the "users" of the human vehicle. Maybe God Almighty wanted to make us all suffer and prepared this trap to send us all out of Eden. God is just, He cannot condemn you for the sin of another. To say otherwise is to attack the Essence of God. Love is Just, and it is completely Just. If I am a judge and my son is involved in an incident, will I, because I have love for him, save him? No. If my love were really like God's, it would be full love for both parties, not just my son. A love that is not fair is not pure Love. You are attacking the very Essence of God.

Do not think that this is a small thing. Justice is so important that it binds God Himself. Against Him no one can do any harm, only He Himself could be harmed if He denied Himself. When the devil cries out to Justice asking for our same destiny, God is forced to create the plan "Universe" to later send his son and that he would validate a new nature for us without incurring in any injustice (Jesus, the firstborn validator of the celestial nature, could make it all new validating a new nature to maintain God, without any angel branding him as unjust because if they did so they would brand their own creation as unjust). If we were God and the devil came to us with claims, we would exterminate him, simply saying that the "Adams" betrayed out of love and so we were going to save them. However, God, who is pure Love and pure Justice, is bound by these same virtues or characteristics, to such an extent that it seems as if only a slight shadow of injustice could damage that symbiosis or that relationship between Himself and His Essence, the Holy Spirit.

Thus, your sin attacks the very Essence of God and has too many similarities with the Sin that has no forgiveness. I am not Jesus Christ, but according to my understanding, you are already condemned to hell, for the sin that you believe, proclaim and teach affects your primal being, and is unforgivable. When you declare and teach that God is unjust, you change sides before you even finish, in fact, in practice it is as if you retract to the origin of treason in heaven to declare yourselves from there followers of Satan who called God unjust to try to save himself by taking our very destiny and taking us as a shield, or as hostages.

May God grant that I get to heaven, but don't let me sit anywhere to judge you Bergoglio because, if it were up to me you would go headlong to hell.
These are your faults:

• You tried to win the world over by posturing and opening your sleeve in ridiculous interviews, not realizing that you were playing into the hands of the people who despise us.  They will always laugh at your jokes, for any darkening of God and approach to the world will be taken as a victory. From the inconsistency, volatility and disorder of the Woke world, only one thing is clear, they despise the certain, the reliable, God. It is not the first time that the church bends down to ease the burden of more faithful and ends up with the same as before, but walking bent over.

• You were taught, so that you could make it public, that God created us in his image and likeness because he created us full and perfect in heaven, as it could not be otherwise, since we originally had an angelic nature. God does not create abortions. You however insist that it is man who is made in the image and likeness of God, when not even before the passion was man capable of receiving the Holy Spirit. Only a few sent directly by God, almost all of them prophets, whose hair was on fire with sparks, were able to receive the Holy Spirit. This is the reason why Jesus goes down to hell for the righteous, because before the passion man was not valid to receive God.  After the Passion we can receive the Spirit and it is that Spirit which is like God, because it is God. But Jesus takes the form of man a posteriori, not in the creation of man and it is He who makes Himself like a man, that is to say He makes Himself man, it is not the opposite case, that man nature is made in the likeness of God. It speaks of our real creation, our original and heavenly nature. That was God-like and has no interpretation: we were made in the image and likeness of God the Father, able to "contain" the Holy Spirit. After the betrayal, we will become like cracked cisterns, as the prophet Jeremiah says in his first time, unable to contain God, the Spirit.

• You were taught to make it public, that it was our personal sin that drove us out of Eden (yes, out of heaven, for why would the devil, or the serpent, be in an earthly paradise if he had already been driven out of heaven? It is the betrayal of heaven that is recounted in Eden with Adam, Eve and the serpent). God cannot be unjust and blame you for the sin of another.

• You were taught to show them, the places where God left our history written from heaven, in the 3 ½ Times spread 10 times throughout the Bible. Our fall from heaven in the plagues as I have already mentioned and a multitude of proofs also for atheists and fools, for it is impossible for man to have manipulated or articulated so many Words that speak unknowingly in the same sense, in distant times and peoples many times different. Just to dwell on these wonderful scriptures would have enabled you to see how much God loves us, how many plans He has made from the beginning of the world for you to act today, you bunch of fools.

• You were taught such wisdom that any researcher would have spent his whole life and traveled the world several times just to sniff out the knowledge revealed here.

• In short, you were taught the knowledge of God, that which you should have already made public and which, as it is written, will spread to all mankind before the end of the world. So much time studying, so much brain wasted, because until today you thought that God was unjust, a kind of Genius wrapped in natural religiosity, capable of expelling humanity for the sin of two. Your origin in heaven was hidden from you, so that you found yourself lost after coming into the world with a sin under your arm that you had not committed, but which was conveniently called original sin, giving really unknown origin to a whole mysterious chain of injustice that has surrounded man of death. Poor Bergoglio! He appeared in the world as if from nowhere burdened with an original sin that he did not commit. Well, no. It was your personal sin that gave rise to your fall and God was trying to save you by all means, like the rest of mankind. It turns out that you are not like a buoy floating in the sea that does not know where it came from. You have your origin in heaven, a personal cause for your fall and, above all, you had a place to return to. With your feet firmly on the ground it is easier to jump upwards than being disoriented and not knowing where you came from.  

• You were finally taught the meaning of Life, for everything makes sense knowing our origin and our personal sin. Even this cruel life takes on the greatest of meanings and not only for you, who even without having your feet on the ground have smelled the Holy Spirit, but for any other man to whom it is revealed. The Lord has shown us by amnesia how one can live without memories, but with what disquiet, how disoriented and how lost one must be when he suddenly knows nothing of his past. For so are all men, and you do not remedy it, although the truth has been revealed to you.

• You were taught the iron Justice unappealable by any demon, which made the firstborn validator of the celestial nature, the only one capable for this reason of validating the new nature of man. Unappealable by the demons; now it is you the followers of these who call God unjust, sinning in such a way as to twist your primal being. It was explained to you why Jesus Christ cried out, "Father, why hast thou forsaken me?" for Jesus could only test man only as man, without the Holy Spirit, without the help of God. All because of that iron righteousness. However, you do not understand how important justice is in all that surrounds God and us.

• You were taught mysterious numbers, hidden until today to the understanding of man, like that number 666 that tells us about all this, about how we separated from God in heaven to remain as separate groups on earth 777-111=666; 6 and 6 and 6. Some marked on the forehead with a less serious sin, the Adam who still listen to God, and others who coveted, the Eve, who took the apple (marked on the hand) and convinced those who loved them (marked on the forehead -Adam-). [And even though the number of the beast is 666, these are not marked because they have no body, but yes, they are the third 6 because they are with us in the world].

• You were given all this knowledge to save these last generations and you have not listened. You were able to save even many of our Muslim brothers who fall to the hells full of hatred for the infidel. For when they come to know God, they will follow the same path they are following now, but banishing hatred from their hearts. And not only many of the most passionate of God hate the infidels, in many others you only have to dig a little to see that hatred, and hatred is the son of Satan, it has nothing to do with God, it takes you headlong to hell. The other day a Muslim burned his daughter for switching to Christianity. Well, of course, it will be much easier for this girl to get to heaven, even though she turned away from the path that God set for her, than her father, who, brimming with hatred, will get to hell if things don't change much for him.

Thus, you save nothing; you watch undaunted as your flock withers. You behave like a civil servant sure of receiving his salary, even if he treats with indifference the user who desperately moves nervously at the window because the deadline to solve his life is running out.

Well, this I say to you: if you have labeled my studies and revelations with "worthy of study" or some similar nonsense, and then you have scattered them by steps in the Vatican, consider this condemnation as "worthy of study" also, because if by the vagaries of life I should judge you in the future, you can count on me to condemn you to hell. For I am a vigilante and I unwittingly side with the weak, and according to the magnanimous account on this website several million have already been condemned to eternal torture because of you since you have known all this. And the penalty of the condemned increases along with the murders committed, that is why today for me you are already condemned.

Jorge Mario Bergoglio, alias Francis: Condemned to Hell. Without possible remission because he has also consciously blasphemed against the Essence of God. Let the rest of the Vatican Hierarchy share condemnation for this, and for the rest, insofar as they have been accomplices and have lived in connivance with the merciless omissions of the culprit.

May the Will of God be fulfilled, and may it not be for me to judge you, but may these accusations be raised against you and yours for the day of your Judgment.

This condemnation is certified with the random Reading to the case: Lamentations 2.6 from the 3rd line, up to 2.7 not included, although it makes no difference whether to take it from the beginning of the paragraph or continue to the end of the word because it goes in the same line. Frankly, I thought it was going to tell me something like "Judgment is mine" or something like that, but it seems to confirm everything. It's going badly Gogli... Now you can believe it or not. I always recommend you to read a random reading to the case, I already taught you how to do it; if He answers me, how much more will He answer you.
Lamentations 2.6 ...
Yahweh has blotted out in Zion the memory of feasts and sabbaths;
In the fierceness of his wrath he hath cast away kings and priests.

22 August 2024 For the Sin of One...[2nd correction]


By the disobedience of one all became sinners, so by the obedience of one all will become righteous.

This sentence as you understand it is wrong. It is wrong. Though by the work of the Holy Spirit it remains true by correctly identifying the pronouns.
And it is totally wrong even from your point of view:

1º Quantitatively it is wrong. The sin was not of one. Since the first one who took and bit the apple was Eve, it must have been for the sin of two or even three since the serpent also had a part. Are you insinuating that Eve being a woman does not count? How many times has the woman counted in the bible, both in the new and old testament? Devorah, Judith, Delilah, the virgin Mary, the one who killed the general in the tent after giving him milk instead of water, putting him to sleep, and piercing his head... Do you think that woman is like an animal that is not worthy of counting? Well, here the Lord has even used a snake to represent the worst of evils, the devil, and the woman is not going to count?

2º Qualitatively it is wrong. Who is the main culprit here? The serpent, the devil. That is the real ‘one’. And if we didn't count the serpent it would be Eve who took and bit the apple first and then convinced the dumbest one, Adam who is carried away by it. And you think that it was Adam's sin, the most foolish one, that ruined everything?

3º The phrase is totally unbalanced to the right. For indeed, it was the obedience of Jesus that made possible the ‘Universe’ plan to save man, and then it would be He who would validate man's nature, and it was all for justice. There was no other option to save us without God being accused of injustice by the fallen angels, who even being traitors like us (to the same degree according to them) do not receive a body. However, since Jesus, the firstborn, is the validator of the heavenly nature, no other angel can declare unrighteous a new nature validated by him, for it would be to declare his own creation unrighteous (already, very repetitive). If God had another way to save us that did not involve the suffering of the firstborn, he would have done so. If that ‘One’ on the left were the first man Adam, we would be equating him with Christ on the right. And through Christ (besides the fact that through Him passes the very Essence of God, the Holy Spirit, in the highest intensity) everything is created, not only men, or the treacherous angels, but also the faithful, and all the heavenly powers, not counting God the Father, nor the Holy Spirit, of course. So it was not an arbitrary act and a random obedience, it was because Jesus was the only one who in Justice could save us, and with that responsibility it was a very painful obedience, of course wrapped in love, which led Him to offer Himself (or to obey, as you see it) already in heaven to save us, but you cannot compare one side and the other of the sentence. Justice is the only independent reason for Jesus Christ to come down to save us, it does not relate to the first ‘sinner’ as you say, nor even to the devil as such, but to the devil's accusation that God is unjust if he saves Adam ‘freely’ (and Evas later) and not them. 

Well, this is written in the Epistle to the Romans, but in it you will not see that it says: ‘by Adam sin entered’ but ‘by one man sin entered’. Which is not nonsense because this term ‘man’ is a bit of a catch-all, not only here but in other parts of the bible, including Genesis in Adam and Eve. All this I have already explained in ‘Original Sin and the Council of Trent’. I wrote this point at the beginning and I was still squeamish to try not to offend anyone; if you read it, change ‘God's desires’ to angels and Jesus Christ, whom I call God's first desire, as the firstborn. You will find it less convoluted. It is also interesting to read ‘The Epistle to the Romans’ to understand Paul a little better. Thus, it all makes sense when that ‘one’ is the devil, and effectively confirms that we were all with him in heaven, for by him sin entered and he convinced some who convinced others (thus it is understood as a stain that spreads little by little). It spread among us in the way that has already been related, in some it provoked covetousness and others rose up to follow those they wanted. From what has been revealed here, even what Paul said makes sense (‘by one - Satan, the perfect angel - sin entered’, but then it continued to spread among us, because it was freely chosen, with different motivations, of course. God cannot blame you for the sin of another).

But it doesn't matter if you don't want to read the point of the Epistle to the Romans or don't want to reason it out. All this is self-evident. I understand that in the knowledge that God exists and fills us with Life, one by faith tries to justify all the scriptures and ends up going round and round until one finds a phrase pompous and catchy enough to leave our concerns sufficiently dumbfounded that they don't bother. For example, turning briefly to Romans: ‘Romans 5:12 Therefore, just as through one man sin entered the world, and death through sin, and so death spread to all men, for all have sinned...’.  After writing this Paul must have been more wide than long. This is like saying, ‘I poured a pitcher of water on the floor of my house, and the whole kitchen got wet, and because the water got under the tile, everyone got wet’. He has no head or tail. He is trying to justify a clear injustice of God, which is not such, because it was our own sin that made us fall.

But Paul was called to write this way, or rather, the Adam and Eve passages are written this way because God wanted to keep all this hidden until today. Later, in the time of Christ and after, He did not want to reveal it because the time had not come to clarify the scriptures. As always, justice plays an important role here as well. When everything is exposed, even the deaf will be able to believe by reason. And the deaf are also bound to justice. The Eves can only be saved by the experience of some Adam on earth, just as the Adams were lost by the Eves in heaven, because of this on earth the Eves will not be able to listen to God, but only to the devil and his idols as they did in heaven. The justice that leads God to unveil everything at the end of time is that everything will be cut off in one day and neither God, nor especially the Adams will act any more in the history of the Eves. This cut off of life or lack of opportunity that the Eves lose, God compensates for by making everything visible from reason as well, so that even the blind can see in their later years. This is written in several places ‘making a way for the blind and lame’ or something like that, ‘at the end of time all will go up to the mountain of the Lord’ or something like that, and many other words...

Know that there are things which were written for different times, as for example, an eye for an eye, and a tooth for a tooth. Discarded by Christ for the man validated by Him. Today there are new times, the last times, and new meanings of the same Words have been revealed for this time.
In any case, as long as the hierarchy of the church remains locked with that rigid bar strapped to its neck, you do not in any way insinuate that God is unjust. Whether you are a priest, or a teacher, or a catechist, or any member of the faithful, whether you owe obedience to a hierarchy or not; avoid by all means even hinting that God is unjust. If you are going to talk about Adam and Eve, try to approach it by saying that ‘following the devil can take us out of heaven or away from Eternal Life’, but don't even hint that God took us out of Eden because of the disobedience of Adam, one person. This is a piece of advice I give you so that you do not become blasphemous heretics who bear false witness against God our Lord. Safeguard your primal self and finish the test. I know that as long as the Hierarchy of the church does not proclaim the truth, many others in turn will not be able to proclaim it fully, but at least do not actively sin against God, for in so doing you act against your own primal being.

Much ink has been spilled trying to justify the unjustifiable. In fact, I make this reflection because of the Office of Readings of Friday the 16th where St. Pacian, bishop, says something like this:

Someone may object to me: ‘But the sin of Adam rightly passed on to his descendants, since they proceeded from him; but have we been begotten by Christ, that we might be saved for his sake?’ Do not think in a carnal way: you will see in what way we have been begotten by Christ.

Well, he says this shortly after introducing Paul's words in the epistle to the Romans. Let's look at the first sentence: ‘Some may object to me: But the sin of Adam rightly passed on to his descendants, since they came from him’. Doesn't he seem to take it for granted as if to pass it on quickly so that no one will notice it as a smearer would do? Quickly so that no one raises any doubts. At least he has the dignity to put it in someone else's mouth (some may object, although he then asserts ‘rightly’). So, he insinuates that sin is inherited from the physical. Since when, if your father is lame, do you also inherit his sins because you have inherited his lameness?  But then, in order to try to explain how salvation is transmitted from Christ to us, he refers to the Spiritual, discarding the carnal (for one thing he refers to the Spirit and for the other he does not; a bit of a cheat, since the spiritual completely denies the inheritance of sin, just like the physical, but even more clearly). Then, in fact, he makes a big deal out of it, speaking of how Jesus Christ became man in the beginning of time, incarnating in Mary's body; already then, in the beginning (fullness) of time, no less [in many other places this reading says: Christ took from Mary a soul and a body, which astounds me]. Of course, it is necessary to explain, even if only in a rocky way, that man was made in the likeness of God and not Jesus Christ a posteriori, he was made in the likeness of the creation man by ‘taking on’ flesh. But to affirm what this bishop says, would be to say that Jesus Christ as man lived with ‘Adam’ or that, perhaps, he was stored as man somewhere waiting for his turn, or perhaps bored in the empty ‘Earthly Eden’ alone as man, surrounded by angels perhaps but the only man in heaven, who knows. In other words, it would be to take away Jesus Christ's independence and equate him completely to one of us who lived a deep sleep after the betrayal until he appeared on earth (in the old days the old women used to say that we were caught by the short hairs in heaven). No. Jesus Christ is much more than us and He becomes man at a moment in man's history to validate it. The only thing missing was that the poor guy, on top of what was going to happen to him, would have to wait a few thousand years in a pre-room or as a sleeping man without enjoying God. The question is that if you don't know your origin you say how is it possible that God made us in his image and likeness? And by reason you answer: Oh yes, of course! It is because of Jesus Christ. And then you have to put him in a place prior to or at least contemporary with the creation of man himself, otherwise the opposite is true: Jesus Christ takes the likeness of the creation of man to validate him. Knowing, however, what our origin is in heaven, and that God created us perfect and full as angels until each one sinned personally betraying God, desiring to take more of His Essence to be greater (driven by different reasons, but all traitors). Then, you realise that it is literal, we were made in the image and likeness of God the Father, capable of containing the Holy Spirit. And you no longer need to imagine possible solutions to that phrase that made you restless and kept you awake at night: God makes man in his image and likeness because that ‘man’ refers to us but in our original nature. In the Bible, the word ‘man’ in reference to us in heaven speaks of our original nature as part of that concealment placed by God, which is why I said that ‘man’ is a word that in a certain way is a catch-all.

This is how all the eminent scholars of the Church work. In order to justify, without knowing, they go round and round in circles. I am a dullard, but God has made everything so clear that only those who are interested in research can see it. Anyone who has studied Theology has already been vitiated, because many have written and founded artificial structures that in one way or another supported what hung in the sky, without taking into account what really happened in the sky before the Universe. They study the picture of the side of the coin they think they see and according to this picture they imagine the other side, which they do not see. When the opposite happens, the side they see was made in reference to the side they do not see, and not the other way round. I have already said that it is normal to look for explanations knowing that God exists and gives us Life, but knowing only a part of our life, that of the earth, those structures are attached in an unnatural way. God hid the first and most important tile in the path to reveal it at this time, and you, like little ants, have been building convoluted structures to cover that principle, and far from making a direct path, or the shortest possible, you have imagined, taking huge detours to get to the origin. It is much easier than all that.

I have already explained that the sin that cast us out of heaven was ours and personal to each of us. God cannot be unjust and condemn you for the sin of another. There is no need to go round and round to know how grace comes to us through Jesus Christ, in what mysterious way. He simply makes human nature fit to receive God. Completely. Everyone can receive it, everyone thanks to Jesus Christ and everyone can be saved thanks to Him. Muslims and those of other religions too, and without being baptised. I have already spoken about baptism. Of course the Grace of God or the Holy Spirit comes and goes, when we sin it leaves, but since the passion all men are able to receive it and to recover it when it leaves. Christ makes us all capable, but we also need paths or religions so that faith can develop and we can be filled with the Holy Spirit according to the size of our soul. It is all done for righteousness. In fact, in the Epistle it says so, though Paul does not seem to be able to identify it. He says:

Therefore it is necessary that the righteousness of Christ should also pass over to the whole human race; and as Adam, by his sin, was a cause of perdition to all his seed, so Christ, by his righteousness, is a cause of life to his seed. The Apostle insists on this, saying: As by one man's disobedience all the rest were made sinners, so by one man's obedience all will be made righteous; that as sin reigned by producing death, so grace may reign through justification, giving us eternal life.

He says that Christ, by His righteousness, is the cause of life for His offspring. And then that by the obedience of one all will be constituted righteous. So it seems you don't know what is the Righteousness that compels Christ to obey in order to save us, i.e. since God the Father and He wants to save us, why on earth is He the only one who can do it. I have already said it 100 times. The first-born validator of the heavenly nature was the only one who could validate a new nature without any angel branding him as unjust, for that would be to recognise his own creation as unjust (I know this by heart). For we betray along with the demons and along with the Eves, and although our (Adam's) sin is caused by love for the Eves, the devil asks for our very fate in order to save himself. He accuses us that our betrayal is equal to his. Thus, that ‘obedience’ or that offering (I really don't know whether it came all from God the Father first, or whether it came from both Father and Son, in which case it would be offering as well), and the subsequent passion, is what justifies all human nature. It is not that it makes each of us independently righteous, though the result is the same, we are all justified. Of course, Jesus is the only one who saves all human nature, and he does so precisely because of righteousness, not that unknown righteousness that comes out of the word ‘justify’, because Paul knows that Christ justifies us and hence speaks of the righteousness of Christ, but he does not know what that righteousness is, which we have already discussed and I have repeated 101 times. Everything is easier, everything has logic and there is no need to create artificial structures to sustain the untenable, that God expels us from Eden because of one's sin, that is, that God is unjust. NO! It was our sin that expelled us and God, in spite of everything, tries to save us by all means, although He is a prisoner of that strict Justice. As for the rest of what you say in that paragraph, it is also a lot of bunk. Everyone blithely overlooks the fact that Adam was not the first sinner, but since it looks good to equate a first and only man giver of perdition with another only man giver of salvation, well, that's it; and so in the process you established that mysterious justice that you didn't know what it was: you finally put Jesus Christ on the right side of the equation by obeying. Of course! That's the reason why Jesus Christ comes down, he had to obey to compensate for the disobedience of the first man! You had no idea of the righteousness that brought Christ down, and so you imagined. Of course! That is the reason why Jesus Christ comes down, he had to obey to compensate for the disobedience of the first man! You had no idea of the righteousness that brought Christ down and so you imagined. It is all wrong because it is based on a lie, that God is Unjust. It is interesting to read the comment before this one, from August 12, if you have not read it, to see all this more clearly.

Finally, to conclude, this bishop says how Jesus Christ begets us, to explain the way in which his grace comes to us. And basically he says that Christ begets us through the Church and the priests by means of baptism. Well, it is true that Christians need to know the Christian fundamentals and follow the Church in order to walk the Christian way. In fact, the definition of ‘way’ is given by guidelines or indications or margins, if you like, of the way itself. But the same is true of other paths, also laid down by God, along which other people, also saved by Jesus Christ, follow. Let us not be short-sighted. The church recognises that Jesus Christ is the Saviour of humanity, but according to the definition given by this bishop, only the salvation of Jesus Christ would be ‘engendered’ in Christians through the Church. To support this he uses the word of John:

Jua 1:1-16
1 In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.
2 In the beginning he was with God.
3 Everything was made through him, and without him nothing was made. What was made
4 in her was life, and the life was the light of men,
5 and the light shines in the darkness, and the darkness did not overcome it.
6 There was a man sent from God; his name was John.
7 He came for a testimony, to bear witness to the light, that all might believe through him.
8 He was not the light, but the one who was to bear witness to the light.
9 The word was the true light that enlightens every man, coming into this world.
10 It was in the world, and the world was made by it, and the world knew it not.
11 It came to its own, and its own did not receive it.
12 But as many as received it, to them gave he power to become the sons of God, even to them that believe on his name;
13 Who were born, not of blood, nor of the lust of the flesh, nor of the desire of man, but were born of God.
14 And the Word became flesh, and dwelt among us, and we have beheld his glory, the glory which he receives from the Father as the only begotten, full of grace and truth.
15 John testifies of him and cries out, ‘This was he of whom I said, “He who comes after me has set himself before me, for he existed before me.”’
16 For of his fullness have we all received, and grace for grace.

This Word of John speaks to Christians, of course, but it makes more general statements. It says in 9 that he is the true light who, coming into this world, enlightens every man. And this is fulfilled unconditionally, because Jesus in the passion validates the Man Nature.

‘But as many as received it, to them gave he power to become the sons of God, even to them that believe on his name’. Here he speaks of believing to become children of God and to be begotten of God. It does not even speak of a Baptism but only of believing. Being begotten refers of course to the Holy Spirit. When the Holy Spirit comes into our being, each one of us, on a daily basis, it is God Himself who takes hold of us, merging us with Him. It is really a ‘begetting’ because we are totally different, and we are filled with real Life when the Holy Spirit is in us. The best way to express that God is fused in us is ‘begotten’ and this can happen at any time in your life, no need to refer back to your birth. Since God is born in you, we speak of ‘begetting’ and you are a new creature. And as I say, he does not speak of baptism, but later when he compares the water baptism of John with the baptism of Fire (or Spirit) of Jesus Christ, and it is so because Jesus Christ validates man's Nature completely to receive God. Jesus Christ saves all mankind, but whoever does not walk along one of the paths laid down by God, it is very difficult to get the Holy Spirit, because it is on those paths where you will meet God, where the dilemma of believing in God or following the world off that path will arise; the test of faith, the test of the world in the end. Let's say that by Christ enlightening all mankind, he means making man fit to receive God, but ‘begetting’ is something that happens when we receive the Holy Spirit, and this comes by faith (not always), or by performing acts of faith. For Christians, faith is transmitted by the Church, although sometimes it is enough to give money that you lack, out of charity or mercy, to receive the Spirit. Those ups and downs that occur from the Grace of God, from the Holy Spirit, which in the Bible is referred to in some parables as buying/selling, is that gaining/losing of the Spirit. Because we don't even remember Baptism, and if the Spirit that comes in Baptism were never lost, we would go to heaven just by being baptised, because it is that Spirit that lifts us up to God (He who believes in me will not be judged). The proof that Baptism is not necessary for non-Christians is that Jesus Christ makes all mankind fit to receive the Spirit, and even one who has no religion can be saved by living in mercy. How much more another who also proves himself in the Faith, or rather, puts his faith before the world and its idols. It is Jesus Christ who saves by Himself, not the Church as such, even if the ways or religions are necessary for us, because mercy does not come to us as often and as intensely as it should.
Otherwise there is something a little ambiguous from 10:

10 It was in the world, and the world was made by It, and the world knew It not.

It seems that in 9 it already puts Jesus on earth (‘coming into this world’) and here it makes an enumeration of facts concerning Jesus. In fact, it says first ‘in the world he was’ and then ‘the world was made by it’, so they are not consecutive facts, for the first cannot be before the second. When he says ‘in the world was’ I think John is referring to the fact that Jesus does not make himself known until he was 30 years old or older because we don't really know how old Jesus was when he died (although they say it was 33 years old). ‘The world knew her not’ may refer to this very thing, that in those earlier years she was not known. That the world was made by her has already been said many times. Jesus being the firstborn validator of the heavenly nature, if He had not wanted to validate the man nature, the ‘Universe / World’ plan would not have been carried out.

There is another possibility. John calls Jesus ‘Word’, why? It may be to differentiate Jesus before he took human form (1-3) from after. It may also be to refer to him being the Word of God the Father among us and finally it may be a way of speaking both of Jesus and of the Holy Spirit, his Essence (and it may be for all three reasons together).  Recall that when the Pharisees tell Jesus that He casts out demons by Beelzebub, He tells them that blasphemy against the Spirit is unforgivable, for they attack His very Essence by equating His Essence, the source of His miracles, the Holy Spirit, with Beelzebub. So to speak of Jesus Christ is to speak also of his Essence, hence perhaps also that ethereal nomination of ‘Word’. The particular use of names in the Bible is not by chance. It always obeys something, and we have even seen that the repetition of different names with the same value hid a hidden meaning in the scriptures. Thus, when it says ‘In the world he was’ it may refer to Jesus Christ not yet made man. Let us keep in mind that God sees all and is with us in the world from before Jesus Christ the man. He may also be in that state prior to taking on flesh in the world. But never to have taken on flesh in the beginning of time. That does not make sense. When it says ‘the world did not know her’, if we think of Jesus as the state prior to being man, present in the world, it may refer to that third time, in which man is not able to receive God, the Holy Spirit. The time on earth before Jesus Christ.

I say all this to emphasise that, indeed, the Church is fundamental for Christians because the Church sets the structure of our path that leads us to God, but equally every path or religion set by God has its ‘norms’ that lead towards love and mercy, the only true direction that the paths set by God, including Christianity, take. And of course, I put this comment also to emphasise that God cannot punish us or blame us for the sin of another as the title of this commentary says.

 

3 September 2024 Other ways to blaspheme against God


The truth is that God is amazing. Anyone with an ear, or one of the Adam's, will have been able to see this in his life. He somehow knows what will happen in the history of man, hence the prophecies written in the Bible, for example. Maybe it is because He is outside of time, maybe it has to do with those string theories of quantum physics, I have no idea, and it is probably a huge nonsense what I have just written, but what is certain is that God knows the future.

We must be aware, then, that God is at work in our lives if we are of the Adams or have an open ear. It is true that the sun rises on the good and the bad, but somehow God does not act in the same way on everyone. Perhaps it is part of that justice that God cannot act, or simply does not act in the Eves, and it is only the Adams who can draw the Eves to Him. This leads me to think that it is these, the deaf, to whom the catechising impulse must be directed (though they will not listen, they will only be converted by a nearby Adam who loves them and shows them God in their own life), as well as the faithful of your own religion. Of course, I do not believe that it is in God's will to change one way that leads to Him for another way that also leads to Him. There is no point in converting a Muslim, for example, to Christianity because God has set that path for him. However, if you go to a country where you see that they sacrifice a gazillion people and then play a game of hoops with their heads, then I think it is justified to catechise them. But even among them there was a way of living justly, and thanks to Jesus Christ those who lived that culture, who were just, got to heaven after the passion (and this is part of God's own Justice). God knows what is going to happen in history. He knows which areas are Christian, which are Muslim, which are Hindu, which are Hindu... God sends souls to the right place so that they can be filled with the Spirit and return home, because he loves us, and he does it like a father sends his children to the right school so that they can be trained according to their aptitudes. Of course, He has taken into account all the historical changes due to the conquests of the faithful of these religions, and in some cases He has stopped sending souls of a particular size to one place and sent them to another place where the right religion continues to fill the size of this soul. But He inserts each soul taking everything into account, and not only religion (although it is the most important) but also family and other aspects that will educate us or bring us closer to Him, because He knows how we were in heaven and what we need to return to "Being"; here I dare to introduce even the social status in which we are born that will also influence our test of the world.

This action in history does not mean that the evils and sufferings that befall us are His doing. The evil freely chosen by mankind causes most of the suffering in the world. But God cares above all that we return to Him. The world is a brief passing moment. It is like when you take your little child for a vaccination. You know it's going to be painful, but you think it will soon pass and he'll come out stronger. God would love it if we all died at once if we were to go to heaven, even if it is because of a nuclear war; of course, if it is without suffering, all the better, He loves us and it hurts Him when we suffer, just as it hurts you to see your child cry when the doctor gives him an injection. But we give too much importance to the sufferings of the world, when time in the world is like comparing a millisecond to a thousand years, and even then we fall short because we speak of the eternity that awaits us after this passing life.

So, when you say that only your religion leads to heaven, you are saying that God is unjust. Of course, He has put in all religions warnings for His faithful not to leave these religions, and it is for our good. Because each path is adapted to fill a different size. Changing religion is like having a petrol car and putting diesel in it. You break down, you don't move forward. Although both are fuels capable of taking you to your destination, it depends on your own being, or your own size to be more correct, whether that fuel can move you, whether it can fill you adequately with the Spirit so that it can lift you in due course to heaven, and down here make you Live with a capital 'L'.

I said in the previous commentary that Jesus Christ saves all mankind by Himself, which means that He makes all men fit to receive the Holy Spirit. Religions, or the ways set by God, are the tools He has put in place to provide us with the Spirit. But it is not the only way, because it is mercy and all that surrounds it, the background of all religions that lead to God. Let's say that mercy is the joker that gets you to heaven by bypassing all the squares. The parable of the talents said to the one who buried his talent in the ground (i.e. stayed in the things of the world): " you would have put your talent in the bank, and I would have received the interest", or something like that. The rules of your religion are that bank. For a Christian to choose to go to mass and follow the rules of the church is to accept to fight the test of the world. In itself, this is not what God wants, he wants us to be like him, merciful, but you can go to mass every Sunday and not be merciful (although just by going to mass you know you must be merciful). What I mean is that mercy is more important than religion itself. This religion being that bank that as a last option God remarks God to the one with the talent (to receive the interest). But mercy laughs at judgement, which is like saying that it flouts all norms and rules, it goes straight to heaven; because that is the most important thing and that is where all religions guided by God lead, that is the goal towards which they direct us, to make us merciful.

It is curious that you say to atheists: no project or policy of man has been maintained for so many years as Christianity; this is because it is not the work of man but of God. And do not think that the same argument can be applied to other religions; how have these been maintained for more than a thousand years if they were man-made? Because they were also ways set by God.

In the Bible it speaks of the 7 Spirits of God. What do you think, that God put it there to laugh at you while you wrack your brains as to what he meant? No. It corresponds to those 7 ways put there by God, to fill his faithful with the same Spirit, but in different intensity or size. It does not mean that God has 7 different Spirits. God is only One, though He may dwell in all of us, He is not cut off or separated, He is One, and when we are not in Grace or do not possess Him, He goes out of us or we do not enter into Him; the result is that we cease to be in the “Holy Spirit” set, which let us say is not uniform, but has different intensities, like a light that has more intensity in its focus. We see this when the sons of Zebedee (their mother) ask to sit at Jesus' side. It is not silly, it is so important that Jesus corrects them (and it is in the scriptures) and says that it is not up to him to assign the places. In fact, Jesus Christ himself sits at the right hand of God, which tells us that he is in that very centre or focus of the Holy Spirit, and this is not written in vain either, he could have expressed that he is going to heaven to be with God simply. I have already spoken a lot about the 7, which not only speaks to us of the perfect but also of those 7 sizes, intensities, or positions with respect to that centre, which we had before we fell down here and which is determined by our size or capacity to "contain" that Holy Spirit. I am not going to repeat it. Or don't you know that we are made in the image and likeness of God? What does this mean? That we are God? No. A 20 cm (8" +-) model of the solar system is made in the image and likeness of the solar system, but "n" million times smaller. We were like God in the sense that He made us capable of receiving the Holy Spirit, in fact, we were similar in everything but intensity or size, for that is how He has made us see how our children are on earth: similar in nature in all things to us. God uses the world to show us what He is like (sun, light, water in three states...). Of course, we could not compare ourselves to God, because we were far away from that centre or that maximum intensity that Jesus also enjoys, but we were made in his image and likeness as a perfect and angelic nature. When we fell, we were like a stranded car, with no engine that could move us. It is Jesus Christ who fixes that engine. Taking the likeness of the new nature man, created by God the Father, he justifies or makes that nature fit to receive the Holy Spirit. All in righteousness as already said: because He was the firstborn who by His love justified the first heavenly nature, He was the only one who could justify a new nature without any fallen angel being able to call it unrighteous, for if any of them did, they would be denouncing their own validation as unrighteous. He can validate any nature (personally living love in that nature) without any of those already created being able to accuse him of unrighteousness, because he is at the validating origin of any other created nature. The proof that it is Jesus who takes likeness from the creation man, and not the other way around, is that he undergoes the passion only as man ("Father why have you forsaken me", or something like that). He had to become nothing, and pass that act of infinite love as nothing, in order in justice to make nothingness capable of receiving God. In so doing, and dying in that act of infinite love, he validated man to receive the Holy Spirit, and it is this validated man who is again the likeness of God, but only in that now as God himself, he can hold the Holy Spirit. That is why we are now adopted sons and God, the Holy Spirit, begets in us or we beget as those adopted sons I don't remember what the word says. This is why man will no longer be what he was, for the best of men, the bible says referring to John, is worse than the lowest of angels, or something like that. So, when the scriptures say that God created us in his image and likeness, it refers to us in our original angelic form, a total likeness. Not when we were made man. In fact, it is not until after the passion, long after the creation of man, that we can receive the Spirit again, that we are again in the likeness of God, and only in terms of receiving the Holy Spirit (yes, the most important thing for us).

Going back to the one religion, if you think that God is only going to save Christians, you are saying that He would only save (in the event that we were all wonderful and made it to heaven) 28.75% of the world's population (this, taking into account that there are about 2300 million Christians). Wouldn't that be a complete failure for God? And, above all, knowing the future as He knows it, would it not be consciously sending almost 72% of the population to hell? Do you really think that God is so sloppy, and so unfair to those who could not receive our religion, the one that according to you is the only one that leads to heaven? I know you recognise that there will be a just judgement also for non-Christians, but do you really think that God would let those 5700 million people loose, without faith teaching, without a way (many more if we count all the past generations)? Don't you know that they are also children of God and He loves them extremely, or absolutely, as His love is, absolute? If you were a parent, would you let the majority of your children be educated on the streets by the example of the street thugs? And if you wouldn't do it, do you think God, who is like you, but without malice and with infinite love, would do it? It is all in God's plans and those religions are those 7 ways represented by those 7 Spirits of God of the Scriptures. When you say that your (anyone's) religion is the only religion, you are calling God unjust (and cruel), and the greater your knowledge of God, the greater your blasphemy against Him. In any case I don't think He likes it one bit. I wouldn't want one of my 6 children to go around saying that I only take care of him, that I only love him. First of all, I would be sad for him, but I would also be making myself look like a bad father to the world. An unfair father, to say the least.

I am done now. I would like to explain what happens with religions in another way that perhaps represents it better. Think that we have a light bulb with a very wide radius of illumination, that is, from its centre or its source to the point where it shines the least, there is a long distance. Now think that we are asked to equalise the light generated by this bulb at 7 points from the centre to the point where it shines the least. To do this, we have 7 torches capable of regulating its intensity (once, then it remains fixed). Indeed, with 7 lanterns we could do it. The only way to represent the intensity of this light in its entire field with only one torch would be for the light of the bulb to be of the same intensity in its entire field, which is not natural for the light. On the other hand, the light seems to have been placed among us to represent God (the sun in some scriptures represents God: where the sun rises...), perhaps so that we understand Him (God) better. What is certain is that we know that in heaven there are places closer to God the Father than others; the closest is at his right hand. They are not all equal in heaven, there are hierarchies or intensities of Spirit. Churches or religions are those lanterns that try to make us equal to the intensity of light we had before we fell.

17 October 2024 The importance of the Ages in God .


Anyone who has been a parent knows how different children are at different ages. But even as adults we see that God has made us different. This is part of our freedom; if He had made us all the same we would be like an army of robots, with little difference between us. I have already explained that the best way to understand the nature of God is to look to a Light, which is why He has placed it among us in the Universe. This would be the Holy Spirit who reaches out most intensely to those who are closest, and the source, or the incandescent filament of the light bulb if you will, would be God the Father. Thus He would not be Him without His Light. Christ, the first-born, would be like the glass that covers the bulb. It is not the glowing wire that produces the Light, but He is at the source. Anyone who comes close to the hot wire of a light bulb (of old), gets burnt, yet He envelops the bulb and prevents us from getting burnt. He was the first created one who pleased God and by whom the rest of the heavenly entities were created, He validated the heavenly nature, He made it possible. So, it is worth asking whether before the creation of the firstborn that light of the Holy Spirit extended its full extent from the bulb or did not do so because there was no need for its Light to reach other created ones. Either way, from that "crystal" that validates the entity "heavenly creation" this Light gives life to all created ones. That is why for all of us Christ is part of the light bulb, that contraption which together illuminates us. He, though created, is one of the three persons of God. God the Father and his Light would still be God without Christ, or rather, before the creation of Jesus, God the Father was still God. But the nature of God is to love, just as the nature of the Light is to illuminate, hence the question earlier, was the Light, or the Holy Spirit, fully extended from the source even when there were no created entities to illuminate? God needs nothing, but is not fulfilled or does not function or Is not if He does not love, just as a light bulb does not light up, or does not function if it is not lit; as a light is not light if it does not illuminate in itself. What would be the raison d'être (of Being) of the First and Only Light if it did not illuminate? And God is the One Who Is. He justifies Himself, His raison d'être is by Himself, He must necessarily illuminate. That is why God is One and Triune, because for us it is the light bulb as a whole that illuminates, and even so, Jesus calls God the Father, and even though we know the parts of the light bulb, it is the whole that we use to illuminate and which we call the Light Bulb; although the filament is the source of the light, for us its light would not be useful or accessible, or would not reach us, without the rest of the bulb, without the glass (in fact, I don't know if you remember, but the bulb once the glass was broken, when the filament came into contact with our atmosphere it immediately broke too, by the way). If you want to look at it another way we can think of the Holy Spirit as the electricity that passes through the filament and the Light as the effect that the Holy Spirit that gives us Life has on us, in the end it is the same thing, for us it is the whole that forms the Bulb and although it has distinct parts, this Light would not reach us without one of those parts. One God, three persons. One Bulb, three indispensable parts. The difference is that in God we speak of persons, because Jesus Christ, like us, is created free, with independence of thought. The person of the Holy Spirit, the truth is that we cannot understand Him well, but we know by His way of living in us, that He has a way of Being. When you sin, it leaves. It doesn't matter if God the Father has sent Him to you, if in your freedom you sin, He leaves and you feel empty again. In fact, we already talked about this condition that must also work for God the Father and it is the reason why He cannot even seem a little bit unfair. We said that, after the betrayal in heaven, when the devil accuses us of being as treacherous as he is, if we had been God we would have said to him: No, I save the Adams because they have sinned out of love (even in our criminal law the intention of the one who commits a crime is fundamental; a murder is not the same as a reckless homicide). However, God the Father cannot even appear unjust, or that relationship between Himself and the person of the Holy Spirit could be altered. In a way, He is a prisoner of the strictest justice, and the devil knows this well: no one can do anything against God, only He Himself could be harmed if He were to commit an apparent injustice, however slight it might be. All this tells me that the Holy Spirit is also an "independent" person to the Father as well; though between the three of them they form that symbiosis or relationship or that All that Is God, which forms the One Light Bulb device.

The hierarchy of the created is determined by the impossibility of two entities or angels created by God occupying the same place next to the light bulb. Since there is a physical place, let us say, to occupy and the extension of the light is radial from the source, necessarily those who are closer to the source will be more illuminated. Several places in the Bible have already been mentioned where we are told of the importance of these places we occupy in heaven. Of course, the Holy Spirit passes through us without casting shadows when we are clean, but sin does cast shadows that prevent the Spirit from passing through us, and these shadows influence others. The first shadow came from the devil, and it covered many in heaven. This was the cause of his expulsion and our expulsion, because in God there cannot be a shadow. Though there are differences of luminosity throughout the radial expanse of the Kingdom of Heaven, they must be cleanly, smoothly, orderly, in the will of God, in His Natural way of Being. To want to occupy a place that does not belong to us is what happened in the rebellion, it is to disorder everything and to generate shadows, to occupy the place that belongs to another.

It is of vital importance in understanding God to know this hierarchy, and above all to bear in mind that Justice is intrinsic to Him as is the very Light that emanates from Him. Indeed, it is of vital importance to understand why the world is the way it is:

∎ Why there are different paths guided by mercy that lead us to Him => For we are different from before the first death. A child is not taught or required to do the same as an adult.

∎ To understand God's Justice is to understand why God has imbued us with a new nature to try to save us => because the demons equated our sin with their sin of betrayal, it was all the same to them that many of us betrayed out of love (Adam) to others (Evas). God to free us from his own destiny, from the righteousness of our old nature creates a new nature man.

∎ Why Jesus, the first of the created ones, the one who validated the heavenly nature, had to be the one to validate the human nature: In order not to commit injustice in the eyes of the demons who were not given this new nature that after the passion will be able to receive God; for if any of them claimed injustice for this new validation, they would be declaring their own validation, their own creation, unjust, since it was the same validating principle, Jesus, who validated them. They cannot cut the rope that holds us, if they too happen to hang on that rope, and if they do so they too fall, it would be meaningless. Anything that hangs from the primary rope is held (justified) by it, independently of anything else that may hang from it.

∎ To understand the Justice of God is to understand why the demons are among us, for everything had to happen under the same conditions in which the betrayal of heaven took place. Now we have a second chance and thanks to the validation of man by christ in the act of infinite love of the cross we are free from any justice of heaven, we are free from that original sin that bound all mankind before christ, all of us after that betrayal before we were men, when we were still in heaven. But He has set us free and in this nature we can again choose the devil and his idols (money, power, sex, affections...) instead of God and His righteousness. Otherwise we would all be saved after the passion of Christ, after the validation of man.

Thus, this choice is the fruit of works, and our works are the fruit of our choice. These are not consecutive, but simultaneous. In other words, each one will live according to his faith and this faith will ask him to live in such a way that he can fill his soul. Hence the different religions, it could not be otherwise within the Justice of God. Because we occupied a certain place in heaven, which received a certain intensity of Light, or of the Spirit of God, we must be filled in the same intensity to return to our place. And it is not that we can fill ourselves at a lower level because it is God's Justice: So much you have lost, so much you have to regain. Or to put it another way, if our soul is of a certain size, it needs that Gas or that Holy Spirit to lift it up to God (equating it to a gaseous balloon whose effect we know, the gas inside may be enough to raise the weight of the balloon, or to keep it from rising - the ghosts that do exist - or it may simply go down if there is not enough; bigger the balloon, heavier the weight, more gas needed to lift it). Hence Jesus Christ said to Mary Magdalene (I think) Do not touch me, for I have not yet ascended to the Father (or something like that). Because he had to be super clean to take her place. Hence the existence of purgatory, which will be for all religions, even if they do not contemplate it, because otherwise most of us would fall into hell. I hope it is not as exaggerated as with Christ (don't touch me), I think that He, being next to God, in the fountain had to be spotless; the glass that surrounds the bulb cannot be dirty at all because if it were, it would cast a shadow on everyone else. Away from the fountain where there is not so much intensity would be another thing, there is no darkness, but neither is there so much luminosity. That is why God the Father cannot seem one iota unjust either.

Hence we Christians are not even allowed to sin by thought, and others are disregarded. The closer you are to the source, the more you can see any dirt, the more any speck of dust will cast a shadow. If we find it too much to say "don't touch me", others will find it too much to sin by thinking. It is not that we are superior to Muslims, for example, God loves us all absolutely, just as we love our children of any age. And indeed, we tend to spoil the little ones more and demand more from the older ones. But this does not mean that we do not also demand the fundamental rules of the family from the little ones:

You cannot think that God imposes an eye for an eye on you when you know that because of your sin (or that of your nature for the obtuse) God would have already struck you down before you were even born if He had been like you (an eye for an eye).

You cannot believe that God calls you to hate the unfaithful when He names mercy and compassion more than five hundred times (compassionate, merciful, forgiving) in your holy scriptures and only names hatred nine times (I seem to remember), where He speaks ill of it; that you believe that when you are unfaithful to God several times in a week; that you believe that when you cannot be unfaithful to someone you do not know. Infidelity is breaking a covenant between two people. And even if there was a prior covenant, if you don't know it, how are you going to keep it? Would God punish you for not knowing it? No, He is merciful. Even he who does not know one of the parallel paths in the good direction, mercy, will be judged justly, for He is just and merciful. And He will not ask you to be something other than what He is. Impossible.

The other day I went to a very nice church in Seville, San Antonio María Claret, which coincidentally (it is called like the one in Málaga) was next to our hotel. There, on 29 September, they read a note about the need to welcome immigrants, and they also made a call to understand that other religions are also paths laid down by God, more or less what they were saying. That note seemed to me to be something general, not specific to that particular parish. It gave me the feeling that it came from above. I would like to think that the Church is beginning to take steps in the right direction in this regard, but the knowledge revealed here must be open to all religions. Muslims consider the Bible as a book of light, it is to them that we must first show what we have discovered, for it is evidence that goes beyond our faiths to the world, even to those who have no religion. It is evidence that confirms their faith as well as ours and others. The day when Christians sincerely join hands with Muslims, the world will see the light, for how can we think that poles considered to be opposites can live together in loyalty and brotherhood? But for this to happen, it is not enough for my friend Bergogli to go and shake hands, Christians must first see this evidence. We must courageously make public what we are saying here, because, as I say, this goes beyond our faith and into our reason. Then the world will change. As long as you remain reticent and afraid of not speaking out, the world will continue to get worse. It is God's will that it should be so, to make you see the signs that speak to us of the end of the world, to push us at once to recognise what He is like: truly Just and Merciful; and this will be the last portent that will precede the second coming of Jesus Christ, when the knowledge of the Lord will spread over the whole earth.

31 October 2024 Yes, the Son was created by the Father. Reviewed Jesus Christ in the Trinity (3/Nov)


I was so happy with my example of the light bulb that I had drawn a little picture of it (see previous comment, 17 October 2024) and now I find out that the church does not believe that Jesus Christ is created by God the Father.

Yes, the person of Jesus is created by God the Father and we are going to see that now. We said that God needs nothing, He is happy by Himself. We also said that He is fulfilled when He loves, and we gave the example of light, which would not be light if it did not illuminate in itself. And all this is true, but God is the One who Is, He must necessarily illuminate, He must love. And this is where the Holy Spirit comes in, who is a person, that is to say, He is not something that comes from God the Father and that's it, but He is to some extent independent of His will, which is why, although God the Father sends Him to us, He leaves us when we sin. Moreover, God the Father is bound to the strictest Righteousness so as not to change that relationship He has with the Holy Spirit, because He cannot deny Himself. He can be just, but He is absolutely just, He cannot even appear to be unjust. Coming back to the Spirit, even we can love when we are alone (???).  If anyone has really felt the Holy Spirit within them, they know what I am talking about. Not as a light state of Grace, because we already know that He dwells in us in different intensity (regardless of our soul size), but strongly. At that moment you are fully happy, and you are so aware of Him that you unwittingly walk around with your hands on your belly to protect Him, as if you were a pregnant woman. Because you don't want Him to go away, because you love Him. God the Father is already loving together with the Holy Spirit, and the Holy Spirit, the Spirit, is intrinsic to Him as the Light is to the filament of the Bulb, even though He is a different person. If this relationship between the person of the Father and the person of the Holy Spirit were broken, God would have denied Himself, He would have ceased to Be, and we know that God is the One Who Is. Everything created rests on Him. It is true that we do not understand the Holy Spirit well and in not doing so we do not think of His relationship with the Father and we unwittingly think that Jesus is necessary for the love of God to be given. It is true that God the Father gives Himself completely to the Son, and for us the Son is Vital, and it is true that once that gift is given, He (Jesus) is already a person of God because the Holy Spirit passes through Him in Maximum intensity, but although all this is true, before the creation of Jesus, God already had a full relationship of love with the Holy Spirit.

Thus, Jesus is a created person and is God's person because that Holy Spirit passes through Him in maximum intensity, and the Spirit becomes one with us, and we are different with Him than without Him. In fact, it also happens to us that when we have the Spirit in great intensity, we unintentionally share Love among those around us, that is the tendency that the Spirit gives you, even though our freedom ultimately guides the ship and He can get lost with time, especially with sleep, and with living in general.

Hence the Words of Jesus:
∎ Why do you call me good? God alone is good... (or something like that).
∎ (after insinuating that Jesus cast out demons by the work of Beelzebub says:) Therefore I say unto you, All manner of sin and blasphemy shall be forgiven unto men: but blasphemy against the Spirit shall not be forgiven them.
∎O my God, why hast thou forsaken me?
∎ That is why he calls God the Father, ‘Father’. Even in the last word he calls him my God’, in this case referring to the Holy Spirit (or both surely, the Father as well).

And does this make Him not a person of God? No. For as I say, the Holy Spirit transits through Him in maximum intensity, which does not prevent Him from being aware that His own person and that of the Spirit are different (even though the Ultimate becomes One with Him), which is why He speaks in this way. Especially this is seen on the cross, when the Holy Spirit (symbolised as the perfect garments) was withdrawn from Him, because He had to test man alone as man, without the help of God. To think that the person of Jesus without the Holy Spirit is by Himself God is to say that He passed the cross because He is God, when He passed it without the help of God (moreover it does not coincide with His way of speaking). To say otherwise is heresy, and furthermore it would not make sense because it would not have validated man's nature, which is what remains for us. I am sorry to tell you that righteousness is fundamental to knowing God (this is so, even if it sounds presumptuous to say so), it is not that Jesus came to obey and counteract that Adam disobeyed, that is absurd and I have already given you several contradictions on how you understand Adam and Eve in a previous comment (22 Aug 2024), it is that He was the One who could validate our nature since He was the firstborn who validated the heavenly nature; let's say He is the ‘official’ validator, anyone validated by Him cannot say anything about other natures that He can validate. The demon who wanted our destiny and who was not made a man, either.

When Jesus calls Himself Son (which He is), He is talking about creation. When we call Jesus firstborn or only begotten, we are likewise talking about creation. And He is firstborn because He was the first created and He is only begotten because He is the only created One through whom the Holy Spirit passes in maximum intensity (as much as the Father's). The one speaks to us of the created person, the other of the Spirit that passes through him (part created, part divine as on earth), this is what makes him a person of God. And this would be enough in itself, but He is also indispensable for us because without Him nothing would have been made, not even the angels. He pleased the Father and without Him man's ‘life-saving’ nature would not have been made either. He is really part of the Light Bulb, the only device that illuminates us, of God the Trinity, the One God. That is why we especially see God as one God, three persons, because they are the three indispensable for us, because, as one God, as the one light bulb device, He illuminates us. And although God the Father gives Himself fully to Jesus, causing the Holy Spirit to flow through Jesus in maximum intensity, and thus making Him the person of God, before Jesus Christ, God the Father also loved absolutely, for He is love and that relationship which He has with the Holy Spirit is Love in Itself. I have already commented in "The Holy Trinity: Jesus Christ" on John's gospel in which he confirms that Jesus Christ is created:

John 1:1-5 In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God. 2 He was in the beginning with God.  3 Everything was made through him, and without him nothing was made. That which was made 4 in him was life, and the life was the light of men, 5 and the light shines in the darkness, and the darkness did not overcome it.       ...
1:9 The word was the true light that enlightens every man, coming into this world. …
1:14 And the Word became flesh, and dwelt among us, and we have beheld his glory, the glory which he receives from the Father as the only begotten, full of grace and truth.

‘Word' seems to refer to the person of Christ. The term ‘Word’ speaks to us of someone you can address or understand, individual, free, intelligent (also of course of knowledge and so many other things), not something ethereal. It is not like the relationship we can have with the Holy Spirit, which is more intuitive, or mixed up in ourselves. Here he names a ‘beginning’, when we know that God is eternal, being that He is the alpha and omega as our beginning and end, not His, since He has no such. This ‘beginning’, then, refers to the beginning of creation, not of God in Himself. Furthermore, it says that the Word was beside God; it places the Word in relation to an already existing ‘point’ of reference. If I say sees beside the square, it is because the square already existed before, or if I say is beside the square, it is because the square is a point of reference already known, normally because it existed before if we were talking about a ‘beginning’.  Even more so when we know for certain that God (as John calls Him in 1:1) was before that beginning, for He is eternal, from which it follows that we place the Word (and creation, if we count the Word as the beginning of creation), not God, in that beginning. Another detail is that John differentiates Christ as the Word, and not as God the Son or person of God, referring to the created person of Jesus (tangible, concrete, individual, with a beginning...), not to that Maximum intensity of the Holy Spirit that when passing through Him makes Him the person of God.
So, seeing how Jesus calls the first person of God: Father, it is logical to think that the Father comes before the Son. There may be some doubt as to whether the egg came before the chicken, but it would be foolish to think that the egg appeared at the same time as the chicken. Besides the fact that the reading from John certifies it, and it coincides with the way Jesus speaks about God the Father that I have already mentioned above.
As for the firstborn, yes, angels are also full sons of God, they are created and can hold the Holy Spirit in some intensity, but they are not God's person, because they are not at the source, the Holy Spirit does not pass through them in maximum intensity. We men lost the heavenly nature and now thanks to Jesus Christ we are again children of God, but this time adopted, we are connected with Him through Jesus Christ. If we can call God our Father (Our Father who art in heaven...), how much more the angels who are sons and not adopted.
To understand all this a little better, it would be good to see the point of the Holy Trinity in its entirety (already, a lot of fabric), because if the Holy Spirit is within us, it is God in some intensity who is in us (Water vapour = Water), carried by our freedom, by our person, and although He moulds Himself as far as He can to become one with us (He cannot coexist with the sin of unlove nor with the mortal sin), He makes us different from what we were without Him.  When this Holy Spirit is at its highest intensity, that of God, it is entirely God who becomes one with you (this only happens to Jesus Christ). This is why I was saying that when we have some of the Holy Spirit within us, we are part of God in a tiny proportion (infinitesimal rather); we adhere to an infinitesimal part of Him. Since the Spirit does not separate, but is One, we ‘plug in’ with God, but the amount that touches with Him is that infinitesimal part of the Holy Spirit that we share. Jesus, however, is at the centre, at the source, through Him the Spirit passes in Maximum intensity, He is God's person, just as He is.

Well, I'll take this opportunity to tell you that I've put these last comments in the book, because I think they are of some interest. After all, I don't have to layout the whole thing again until 800 pages, I think, so you're lost, it might get even fatter!I have corrected a little, some of the Holy Spirit is Spirit, some of Jesus Christ, and the cross I have redone because it was too corny with the example of the duck. There was something that wasn't quite right: in the written example of God the Trinity as Water, which I have removed, Waves of Water..., I put that, when God created us, our freedom made us different from Him, separated us from Him, and it is true that our freedom differentiates us, but it seems to be understood that by our will we made ourselves different from Him. No, God made us as He wanted, with the size He wanted to give us (or He placed us closer or further away from Him, would be another way of putting it).

Finally, I must remind you that the longer you delay in spreading the revelations of the book among men, the worse the world will become, for this will be God's sign to us that the end is near. I reckoned 2025, of course I didn't think you shepherds would be so foolish then. However, I always put the end in God's knowledge, I am not a soothsayer, only God knows. I did calculate that from the time this became known (when you finally make it public, you who can), He would take about 5 years to close the world, but I repeat only He knows.

25 November 2024 Reworked and Completed.

I have gone through the whole book. In fact, I have read it in English and I have been able to correct many mistakes (although there will be more, my English is horrendous).

• The translator had translated in many places time, as half, understanding that I was referring to times of a football match perhaps (1st Time = 1st half), so it must have been a mess for non-Spanish speakers, little or nothing will have been understood of the 3.5 times. Perhaps the Lord provided this to wait until the book was finished.
• I have further adjusted the 3.5 times, without changing anything substantially, but it is even clearer.
• I have deciphered A Great Sign appeared in heaven, which I add to the deciphered tab. Actually, in reviewing I have seen that everything always has the same value, there is no need to stretch the rubber band. The Water represents the Holy Spirit, even if it comes out of the mouth of a dragon, among other things, and I have seen the striking similarity with other scriptures.
• I have changed the register. Ten years ago, I registered it as Public Domain, but it had to be published without any changes and naming the author. Now I don't have to be named and it doesn't have to be reproduced in the same way (I didn't take anything, there was a time when I put 1 cent to count the copies sold on amazon, but after three or four months I took it off).
• Soon I will publish it also in epub (ebook), when I do, I will put it at your disposal in the download tab.
• And yes, unless the Lord sends me a Word, it is finished.  The backward march begins. Alea iacta est.

The Word that has come to me is:
...By Naboth (9). In the letters he wrote the following ‘Proclaim a fast...’
Well, that's where I've put my finger, the full reading doesn't actually say anything about it (1st Book of Kings 21, 9), but that precise phrase does, so I take it that the Lord confirms me to stop it (although fasting seems something not definite..., God will say).

Caritas Christi Urget Nos

(*) I add this to tell you that I have not reread the readings in English, so it may happen that words from that reading are commented on in the text and are not exactly the same. Even more so considering that I translated many of the readings automatically with the translator (also to avoid this discordance, but Deepl translates differently if it finds an old text and a new one). This is seen for example in the reading of the parable of the mines where many English versions call it pound, Latin mna, (which in Spanish is mina=digging for gold..., and coin), which takes away the ambiguity and the real value.
On the other hand, I've come to realise that perhaps the Lord is asking us all to fast after all. Well, there it is written just in case.

29 November 2024 Unbroken, Just to correct...

Well, I am not going to break the fast and of course, I am not going to question Jesus through whom the Holy Spirit transits in the Maximum intensity, that of God, (He is 2nd Person of God). I am only going to correct something that I have seen while changing the format to Ebook. Besides, I have put that John confirms that Jesus is created and I have not explained it correctly, so it may seem a deception. Here is the text explained a little better.

21 April 2025 What will be, will be…

Pope Francis died today. Now is the time to speak well of him, since he has died... Well, no. Bergoglio arrived with a willingness to change things, but he came to nothing, despite being warned by what has been revealed in this essay of his obligation: to reveal the knowledge of God.

And you will say, well, but the Lord is Merciful... And it is true, there is no doubt about that, but that does not detract from the fact that justice must be developed.
Pope Francis doubted the existence of hell (at least at the beginning of his pontificate I heard him make statements about it), because he said that God is Merciful, so how could He condemn us to eternal suffering? I have already shown that God does indeed want to save us and will do everything possible to do so, but He is bound by justice; if He is not faithful to that justice He would deny Himself, the relationship between the person of God the Father and the Holy Spirit would be broken. Not only is Jesus Christ asking for us up there, the Father also wants us back. But the devil, threatening God (no less) to brand him as unjust according to the treatment he has received; since evil cannot dwell in God, both the devil and his own, as well as all those men who in justice do not turn away from him, are condemned to suffer the same fate.

It is curious that the Pope fell for this ‘do-gooder’ argument, for it is the same argument that atheists whip up against Christians: ‘If God existed he would not allow suffering in the world’. No. God has given us a second chance because we would have already been condemned for our actions in heaven. But this second chance had to be done within righteousness, creating a new nature that would escape our sinfulness from our nature in heaven, and to do so, only christ, the first created one who pleased to create everything else, and everyone else in heaven (and then on earth), could please in that new nature as man. And all with the devil, source also of suffering, among us just as it happened in heaven.
Thus, in fairness, Francis will be blamed for all those damned souls of the accountant out there, up to the moment of his death. For he was forewarned, he knew what his obligation was. Notice that even Judas could have found forgiveness if, after returning those 30 coins, he had gone to ask Jesus for forgiveness. However, he is the son of perdition, as Jesus himself says. And Jesus' soul was resurrected or filled with the Spirit of God as soon as He died on the cross (before the cross His perfect garments were taken away = Holy Spirit; ‘Father why hast thou forsaken me’ = because only man's nature was tested on that cross). And in fact, Judas' betrayal was part of the circumstances that led to that moment of validation of the man nature as capable of receiving the Holy Spirit. Now imagine how much God must be grieved by the loss, not of corporeal life, but of the souls of so many whom the curia in general and the Pope in particular could have saved since the knowledge of God and our history from heaven has been revealed here.
So, if God allows another Pope, this one, after a period of grace, will carry with him the soul counter, that is, restarted; Francis has taken away the previous ones. The truth is that I doubted that there would be one more Pope, and not only because of St. Malachy but also because of what is revealed here (as well as many other things such as the number of Pope 112 - it seems it was - in what Malachy predicted; let us remember that God often speaks with numbers). Maybe it is that Francis should not have failed and Malachi's prediction was a support to help him make decisions... We don't know. I only know that it is not far off, and I insist, it is because of what is revealed here.
And it doesn't matter if you are the pope or the most dutiful, if you don't have love you don't have anything. If you are capable of seeing how souls slip into hell without doing anything, you have no love.
Something similar is happening in the world now.
In this essay all the cards have been laid out on the table. These are objective things and we cannot follow the trend of everything we have previously learned without taking them into account, because we will be closed-minded and unjust, for without knowledge there is no justice either. Justice needs to know all aspects, everything that has happened in order to judge. That is why you, who do not know, come to the conclusion that God is unjust in condemning us all for the sin of one man (for example), or in making your way of salvation exclusive as the only one set by God. If the evidences of the world apply to the world, the evidences of the Scriptures apply to our Faith. Do not ignore them for the sake of trying to maintain the outer shell.
If the interior changes, it would be unjust, hypocritical and ultimately breaking the pillars of your Faith, to keep the shell intact before the eyes of men.
Poor Bergoglio. In the end, just that: a poor quiet man, called to unite and revive the religions in the world before the end of time; all on their own path, but all in the same direction as has always been the case (even if you want to ignore each other): love and mercy. But he dared not, despite being warned and having God's logic revealed to him. His sin of omission will undoubtedly have repercussions for his future. We can only wish him to rest in peace.
Now only God knows what will be, will be..., but we know for sure that we are close to the end, for God has already revealed Himself. It only remains for this knowledge of the Lord to spread throughout the world. Do not keep it to yourselves, for not changing the outer shell....

08 May 2025 Begotten, not created

Let's look at the word beget.

The word beget comes from the Latin Ingenerate and means ‘to bring into being, to create’. Its lexical components are: the prefix in- (penetration) plus generate (to produce, generate).
A definition close to our credo is:

To procreate, to propagate the same species, by the mechanism of reproduction.
I assume that ‘begotten not created’ refers to that of the same species. Either way, I'll stick with what the word suggests to me: to generate within. Within a mother, as we understand it. So, man begets man, not really creates him, although the result is the same (a new creature), I say this because I have equated it there.

But the most important part of this begetting refers to the Holy Spirit, not the body. In fact, to suggest that Jesus' body was begotten, as we understand it, would mean that part of his DNA was from Mary and part from God the Father, which is nonsense. Even if it were only Mary's DNA, that would be nonsense. He is created by God and begotten, in the sense that he is implanted within Mary (in-generate). Implanting an egg or germinating one is nothing to God, not even to man today. The really difficult thing was to give birth to Jesus as a man, that is the greatest miracle because God the Father is obviously not a man, and Christ was not created as a man in heaven either. Jesus existed before everything (the created) and takes the form of man in order to make man fit, able, to receive the Holy Spirit, because after our betrayal in heaven we could no longer receive the Spirit.  [The only one who could justify us was the first of the created ones, the one who pleased God and was able to keep the Spirit in the highest intensity. By Him in heaven all the angels were created and later, after the betrayal, the earth and the new life-giving nature ‘man’ to try to save those who betrayed God for the sake of the love of the ‘Evas’. Only the first one who validated the heavenly nature could validate another new nature (man) as capable of receiving the Holy Spirit, without any of the worst of the treacherous angels (demons) being able to brand God as unjust for not having received the opportunity to live again (harbour the Holy Spirit) as these were not made man. If it was Jesus who let you in to the party, Jesus can let others in without you being able to complain? As always, Justice is consubstantial with God, ergo, injustice in God is impossible, it is to deny God.]

Thus, the Divine part of Jesus is that Holy Spirit that flows through Him in maximum intensity, and it is that Holy Spirit, though not in maximum intensity that makes us children of God. Thus, we can be begotten again as His children, as the Bible says, because it is the Holy Spirit in us that, by dwelling within us, makes us into new creatures, as He merges with our person and gives us true Life, and Happiness.

The problem is that this Spirit cannot live with sin and when we sin He leaves. This is the same condition that binds God the Father with regard to Justice. God cannot be unjust because He would deny Himself. The relationship between the Father and the Spirit would be broken. It is the same for us. God cannot deny Himself, the Spirit cannot coexist with sin, the Spirit cannot deny Himself, and before this happens, our relationship with Him is broken when we sin grievously or out of unlove. Indeed, the Spirit can be lost. It comes and goes.

There are several words of Jesus that confirm this condition that God the Father, Jesus himself and even us have, when he makes clear this differentiation of the Holy Spirit:

∎ Why do you call me good? Only God is good.
∎ Lord, why have you forsaken me, (because only man's nature was tested on the cross, the Holy Spirit was taken away from Him just before the cross, this is symbolised by the perfect garments being taken from Him).
∎ He who blasphemes against the Holy Spirit will not be forgiven, neither on earth nor afterwards (or something like that).
And others.

I am already repeating myself a lot, but it must be clear that Jesus is part created and part divine, and this is also true in heaven. That is why he is Son. And that is why we can become sons again, we can be begotten again without returning to our mother's womb (as one of the readings says). Because it is the Holy Spirit, it is always Him and our whole existence, our second chance on earth, our ability to live, to be happy, to get to heaven, the validation of man, the passion of Christ, everything, has been done so that we can keep Him in our being, now as men. Thus, we can be begotten again, not created (although man's own nature is God's creation). It is personal to each of us with the Holy Spirit, and it has only been possible because Jesus broke every chain that bound us to the condemnation we earned in heaven. And He did so by fulfilling all righteousness, otherwise the Holy Spirit could not have indwelled any condemned man. And those enlightened ones who could receive the Spirit before Jesus Christ, did so because they were not condemned, they did not have the sin of betrayal, they were not of the Adam but of the faithful Angels. These, many of them prophets, were sent directly by God. The virgin Mary is likewise without blemish on earth or in heaven. Would you have sent your innocent Son to be cared for by a traitor? No. Neither would God. He is closer than He seems, and His desire is to save us all, but He is bound by righteousness, and as I say, the Holy Spirit Himself cannot coexist with evil.

If we think of the Holy Spirit as what God the Father and the Son have equal (They share it..., it flows through Them...), and it is the source of His divinity, the Essence of God in Himself, we see that it is their persons that are different. To understand a little of the Holy Trinity we can think of that many can have at the same time God in themselves, because they are in the Grace of God; many, many, and not only Christians, and there is only one God. This, which seems understandable to us because many of us have felt it (God in us), is the same as saying that there is only one God and three persons, I don't know what all the mystery is about. It is the Holy Spirit who confers the Divinity, and even when we are in Grace, we are in intimate communion with God, with the Holy Spirit who merges within us. Of course not in the intensity of the Father or the Son, but it is still God in us, and this will be best seen by those who have been most intensely pierced by the Spirit. I remember in my school days studying literary monks whose writings described their sense of God with real ecstasy. I myself have felt that Fire on occasion. That Holy Spirit who dwells in many, bringing them into communion, is God in each of them, and remains one God. We could call it the mystery of the “N-nity”, and, with a little distance, we would say that there is only one God in many persons. It is the same mystery as that of the Holy Trinity but on a different scale.

And of course it is that Spirit that begets, that makes us new creatures. That is the Divine Nature of Jesus and that is the most important thing about being begotten, because it tells us that He is a person of God (propagating the same species). To speak of Jesus (man's body) being begotten in Mary, as I said, is a trifle. And I say it is a trifle because it is nothing to God to introduce a germinated embryo into Mary's body or simply the DNA strand into Mary's own embryo that will beget Jesus. I see miracles very often, and not just signs or answers to my questions using readings from the Bible, but real miracles. For God, the Creator of the Universe, of the planets, of the great constellations, of the wonders that surround us, even in the small things, it is a trifle to beget the body of Jesus in Mary. But the most important begotten, I am sorry to insist so much, for me refers to his Spirit, which in turn is filled with the Holy Spirit in the highest intensity and makes him a person of God. That in itself was the most painful thing, because really our bodies are like ships that carry our spirits and it is our spirits that long to be filled with the Holy Spirit. Thus, human nature is that union of body plus Spirit, and for us the body is indispensable because we exercise our freedom by moving and living among ourselves with it on. But in itself, the vessel, the body, is a physical thing that carries what is important: the spirit. As for the body, today even a man can artificially engender a being of any species in his corresponding female.  And, as I say, what was especially painful was to fit the Spirit of Christ into a man's body because He was not a man in heaven, but took our nature to validate it here on earth; there was much pain in heaven the day Jesus became man to save us.
And before Jesus Christ, on earth, after the betrayal of heaven, man had a broken spirit carried by human bodies, but inwardly he was dead. It is the Holy Spirit who comes to us (potentially) after Jesus validates the new nature (body of man + spirit), who gives us Life. We are begotten in God. But even a member of your body can become necrotic when the blood does not reach it because of clogged veins, and it dies. Thus, we can die again inwardly if we lose the Holy Spirit.

To continue with this example of Blood, let us suppose a Living Heart, but inert, full of Blood. Without veins or arteries, with only one ventricle, since it does not need to pump Blood. This is God the Father. He is Happy in Himself, and needs nothing because He loves His blood intensely. This I have already said: one can love the Holy Spirit immeasurably, we have seen it in those writings of the literary monks. It is a love of God, but it is done by, or to, the Holy Spirit, since it is the one we can feel in some intensity within the finite universe. No one has seen the Father... but he has felt the Holy Spirit. Well, this Source, this heart decides to share its bliss, its Love towards the Holy Spirit with another, and so it creates a wall within Him, which it calls Jesus Christ. And he sees that this wall also loves the Blood and is loved by it, which pleases him enormously. Thanks to this wall which is in the heart itself, in the source, He decides to create new cartilaginous walls which will form other arteries and veins, but these will remain outside the Heart. Thanks to the fact that the heart now has two ventricles, with this wall: Jesus, the heart can pump Blood to these arteries and veins, the whole of the heart with its ventricles being for them the only Source that gives them Life.

∎ Thus, the heart would be dead if it had no Blood or if it were pierced and the blood emptied through the hole. Which is the same as saying that God cannot deny Himself. If He were unrighteous, that heart would be punctured and the Holy Spirit would come out of it.

∎ On the other hand, the arteries would be dead if the heart did not pump, so for them, the wall that distinguishes the ventricles, Jesus, is vital and is part of the one heart that gives them Life.
The arteries are wide because a lot of blood flows through them, but then there are other veins and capillaries which are also irrigated by the Blood, but which do not have the same capacity. These are all of us, of different sizes, just as the illuminated stars have different intensities. And would it be fair that the capillary of a hand should have the same blood flowing through it as through an artery? It would neither be fair, nor necessary, nor would it be good for that capillary, for it would burst. This is what happened to the demons who wanted out of greed to fill themselves with the Holy Spirit, the tree of Life, to become like God, but they were destroyed like cracked cisterns unable to contain the Holy Spirit. We likewise betrayed and our spirit was broken, but by not hating as they did, God was able to give us a second chance at a new nature, which, when validated by Jesus Christ in an act of infinite love, could once again contain the Holy Spirit, escaping the righteousness that bound us to Pharaoh, to the demons.

∎ This distinction between the thickness of veins is what determines the different religions, for all (7) guided by mercy, prepare us to receive the Holy Spirit in one intensity or another; to have the Holy Spirit flow through us. God is just and will not ask anything of us that we cannot fulfil. In fact, He will ask of us the minimum that will enable us to Live with the Holy Spirit, to be begotten in God, to be sons, now adopted, even though it is His very Blood that comes to flow in us. For yes, we are now a graft in the circulatory system, and though the Blood first passes through the whole network of original, This one thanks to the pumping generated by the Heart and the ventricles by Jesus distinguished, finally reaches us. Another way of putting it would be that in heaven we will be like the veins (and not arteries) that carry the blood back to the heart. We have seen in Ezekiel's New Temple or actually Heaven , that we will not occupy the same place as before; it is also explained in Revelation as two trees of Life, one the original and one for us. There is also Justice in this.

The scandalous difference you see between the various religions has to do with the great difference between an artery and a small vein. Indeed, they are different, but they have in common that they allow the Blood to pass through them to give Life, for all these religions are guided by mercy and are directed towards God.

So, since without the Holy Spirit we are dead internally, it is the Holy Spirit that engenders Life in us, linking us to God, in that marvellous circulatory system whose Blood, whose Holy Spirit, is in communion with all. We could say that it is the propagation of the species, according to the definition of begetting that we know, although in fact, before the world, before our betrayal, we were part of heaven.

30 May 2025 Holy Ghost 3.0 Encrypted Channel Installation Instructions.

Holy Ghost 3.0 Encrypted Channel Installation Instructions.
SECTION A
If the prospective user is enrolled in the Book of Life go to Section B.
For those who do not have the access card, there is a way to hack the encoder in order to receive the Holy Spirit Signal.
You must read the instructions attached to this website (lalogicadedios.com) to understand from the world's logic why God Exists, with emphasis on:
The elucidation of the hidden keys of the Bible.
The three and a half times that show codified our history of Life and Death since we live (and betray) in heaven.
The foreshadowings of Christ in the Bible, hundreds of years before his coming.

The verification from the intelligence of the world, or scientific, of these extremes, will decode the signal of the Holy Spirit that will be apt to be visualised now by those who were not inscribed in the Book of Life. We thank the user JesúsdeNazaret111 for the signals he has been sending us and for making it possible for us to bypass this complex security system. Unfortunately, non-subscribers, or those not registered in the Book, will not be able to download the content to their device, they will only be able to glimpse the Spirit and act accordingly. Once the device has expired, it may be possible to access the internal memory to try to download any remaining Holy Spirit between circuits to a new device. Otherwise the old device will be left in the junkyard and there will be no point in fitting a new device to make the transfer.

SECTION B
Once we are fully aware that we are inscribed in the Book of Life or, failing that, we know without any doubt the existence of God, we find several ways to calibrate the antenna to receive the ‘Holy Spirit’ Satellite Signal on our device.

a)   The most effective way is to receive an injustice or an attack and not defend against it, when we do have the ability to defend ourselves. This is the most effective and works even if this is done with the intention of receiving one's own Spirit, i.e. it need not be done out of love for the enemy, out of love for the one who is attacking you (which is very difficult and at the same time has the greatest reward).

b)   The almsgiving of an amount that you really need (perhaps for some people €50 is enough, for others more), with this thought: ‘he needs it more than I do’. Small alms serve to maintain the Signal, but not to improve it. Who says money, says time or other donations.

c)   Listening to the Word of God or catechesis from someone who also possesses the Holy Spirit. This is more effective the more Holy Spirit the speaker possesses. If the rate of reception of the Holy Spirit Signal by the speaker is low, it will only serve to maintain your own Holy Spirit Signal, but not to improve it.

d)   For Catholics, confession. Although in my experience I have found that the effect is different depending on the priest who confesses you, i.e. the Holy Spirit of the confessor, in a similar way to point c.

e)   Prayer and fasting are also for the maintenance of the Sign, although they predispose you to a better realisation of the first two points, a and b, which are the most effective, and to open the ear for point c. Prayer also serves to repair or replenish small losses of the Spirit.

SECTION C
Actions in pursuit of the Spirit that are only maintenance may result in just that: maintaining what you have, so that if you have little you may not actively enjoy the happiness that the Holy Spirit Himself imbues you with. This can be likened to putting money in the bank (parable of the talents), which are interests to be enjoyed later. These actions include going to mass and other activities for Christians, and to their own temples for others, unless point c is given, in which case the enhancement of the Holy Spirit will be palpable already down here.
For members, or subscribers, and non-members, the knowledge of God is the key that unlocks the whole catalogue at no cost (all free) so it would be interesting for everyone to experience SECTION A; always bearing in mind the limitation of non-subscribers, who, although they will be able to visualise the effects of the Holy Spirit around them, will not be able to download it to their device. This is part of the law, part of justice, and it seems that it could not be hacked.
Some readings are interesting in order to make an introspection of our device in search of the Holy Spirit, an important step to open it to Him. Among these I put the last commentary published here, that of 8 May 2025. Non-Christians reading the commentary can skip the ventricular wall if they wish, the important thing is that they understand that God resides in us when we are in His Grace, and that this is not infinite God as we would burst, but the Essence of God in some intensity. Just as we are different outwardly, so inwardly our spirits are of different sizes as the intensity of light emitted by the stars or the different sizes of veins. May they understand that parents teach their children by example the way to be, and that if He is merciful, that is the direction we should take. Each in his own capacity, in his own measure. This condition and the fact that God is just, is the foundation of the different religions directed towards mercy, because He will never demand something of us that we cannot do..., fulfil..., live.
Thus, the knowledge of God is a prerequisite to be able to grasp the Holy Spirit Sign in the non-members or non-registered, as they were denied the access card of the Faith. For the members it is an invaluable help. The very knowledge of this distinction (members, non-members or booked and unbooked), as well as the reason for the existence of this distinction between the inhabitants of the earth, is already a de facto knowledge of God and His righteousness. Incomprehensible facts, such as the case that in every family there are registered people who receive the Holy Spirit and live very differently from other non-registered people, when they all received the same education, can be perfectly explained from the knowledge of God and His Righteousness.

LAST SECTION
All the revelations on this website, together with the upheavals in the world, which have been caused by the loss of fear of nuclear weapons, by the greed of the politicians of the great powers (Russia, USA, China), together with the separation of God from Europe, are warning signs that we are approaching the end of the world.  Africa and the Middle East are not spared from this, for many Muslims believe that the Koran is a book of hatred, or that it justifies hatred, towards infidels (which they in turn think of as non-Muslims), when it is the opposite: a Holy Book that aligns them with God's mercy. Nor is Israel spared, which turned an act of self-defence into a way to better position itself, without valuing the lives lost along the way. Why? Because now everyone is turning away from God, because the world is blind. People no longer matter, when for God every person is like a child who has been torn away from Himself. It is easy to fall into temptation, into an eye for an eye, into revenge. When I hear that most of the rapes in Spain are carried out by immigrants, I get bad thoughts directed towards this group, which I immediately dismiss because I know that they come from the devil who always wants to separate. It is not a question of belittling groups, perhaps the laws should be changed for everyone.  Anyway, I too am a sinner and I can put myself in the shoes of a Jew who has been attacked by his neighbours, but there is a limit to everything and God's mercy must always guide us.
Today, I believe that the greatest sinners are in the hierarchy of the church, for they are idolaters of their own rules. And it is true that the pastors of other religions are the same, but it is with the Bible that God has wanted to reveal the proofs of their existence without the need to believe. Something similar to what happened with the Pharisees in Jesus' time is happening now with the Church. Surely when you read the gospel and see how the Pharisees were obstinate in not paying attention to, nor accepting the signs, signals and evidences that Jesus showed on his way, you think of them as fools..., idolaters of their rules. Especially when watching films about the life of Jesus. Today these idolaters are in the hierarchy of the Church. They have been shown the knowledge of God, written ‘in his handwriting’ in the Holy Scriptures, but they hide it to follow their rules, their static bureaucracy. If the manic depressive seems to wallow in his depressive states, the church hierarchy wallow in their rules, content to know them and move leisurely among them. Don't change a line, for they have them all erected as if they were limiting walls of gold. It doesn't matter that the world is collapsing, it doesn't matter that God has made known the key to His scriptures, it doesn't matter that He has opened heaven, that He has made the Holy Spirit free to drink... it doesn't matter, the best thing is to hide it from everyone lest our little beach bar collapse. Idolaters. Because that is idolatry, putting something before God that takes you away from Him, from His will. Well, there's already at least one who's already in purgatory for this (1, 10, 100, 1000 years? We don't know). This random reading from Jeremiah I opened at the beginning of writing the essay and as I have gone on it has made more sense:

Jeremiah 25:15-38
Thus saith the LORD God of Israel unto me, Take this cup of the wine of fury, and make all the nations drink it, whither I send thee: 16 And they shall drink, and thunder, and be mad at the sword which I will loosen among them....
And thou shalt say unto them, Thus saith Yahweh Sebaoth, the God of Israel, Drink ye, and be drunken, and vomit, and fall down, and rise not up before the sword which I will loosen among you.  28 And if they refuse to take the cup from your hand to drink, you say to them, Thus says Yahweh Sebaoth: You must drink without fail, 29 for it is through the city that bears my name that I begin to punish; and shall you go unpunished? no, you shall not go unpunished, for I call for the sword against all the inhabitants of the land - the oracle of Yahweh Sebaoth.
Therefore you prophesy all these words to them, and say to them:
Yahweh from on high roars, and from his holy Abode lifts up his voice.
He roars against his sheepfold: he cries out like the winepressmen.
To all the inhabitants of the earth 31 the echo reaches to the end of the earth.
For Yahweh pleads with the nations, and he overcomes every creature in judgment.
He delivers the wicked to the sword,’ is the oracle of Yahweh.
Thus says Yahweh Sebaoth: Behold, a misfortune spreads from nation to nation, and a great storm arises from the ends of the earth.
33 There shall be victims of Yahweh in that day from one end of the earth to another; they shall be neither mourned nor gathered nor buried any more: they shall become dung upon the face of the earth.  34 Howl, you shepherds, and cry out; wallow, you herdsmen, for your days are fulfilled for the slaughter, and you shall fall like choice objects.
There will be no escape for the shepherds, nor escape for the herdsmen.
36 The cry of the shepherds is heard, the howling of the herdsmen, for the LORD is destroying their pasture, 37 and the most secure pastures are destroyed by the fierce anger of the LORD.
38 The lion has left his den, and his land has become a desolation before the fierce anger, before the burning anger.

Perhaps, after all, Benedict XVI was indeed the last Pope of the Church as we know it, for if Leo XIV made the knowledge revealed here his own during his pontificate, he would do his best to speak to the whole world and spread it, but without proselytising to the exclusion of others (for that is proselytising by definition). He would speak of other religions also as part of the Church of God. Everything would be different. He would be the Pope of a truly Universal Church, regardless of the fact that he would not be recognised as such by other religions. Such is the revolution of all that the Lord has in reserve for our days.

[Random reading of the case I opened to see if I would publish this commentary is Ecclesiasticus 41:1-4, and except for a curious numerical coincidence, it speaks of the goodness of death for all, which does not seem very relevant to me, but well, it does not contradict what I have said. If you are curious, look it up].

---Correction---
[Well, I didn't really see much point in this word for not talking about what this commentary is mainly talking about, the Holy Spirit, however, since I open the reading at the end and put it at the end of the commentary it may have a bearing on the LAST SECTION. I put the Reading:

Sir 41:1-4 O death! How bitter is your remembrance to him who lives at ease among his possessions, to the carefree man who prospers in everything, and is still able to enjoy pleasures!
(2) O death, how sweet is Thy sentence to the needy man who is destitute and destitute of strength, to the worn-out old man, troubled by everything, who rebels and has lost patience!
(3) Fear not the sentence of death, remember thy origin and thy destiny.
(4) This is the sentence of the Lord for all, why refuse the will of the Most High? Whether you live ten, a hundred or a thousand years, in the abyss no one will argue with you.

And yes, it does seem to be relevant because it speaks of death for two groups: for the prosperous and for the needy, just as I speak of the inscribed and the uninscribed. And since it is at the end of the LAST SECTION, it seems to say something like: If you go on like this, you will all die, one and all the others, but it doesn't matter if you spend 10, 100, 1000 years in purgatory. Ok, maybe it's a bit far-fetched, but I see a certain tone of irony or sarcasm rather, as if the Lord was responding in this way to a comment I make in a joking tone by treating everything as the installation of a Software. The last verse especially is like saying: It is so for all, why differentiate between one and the other; it doesn't matter if you live 10, 100, 1000 years in purgatory; because just before it says don't be afraid of the Lord's sentence (to both groups). It is like saying what do you prefer, fear or death? It doesn't matter if it's fear or death, that's the way it is...
And believe it or not, at the beginning when I was talking about Benedict XVI in a veiled way (‘Well, there is already at least one who is in purgatory for this (1, 10, 100, 1000 years? We don't know)’), I had written (10, 100, 1000 years) which coincides exactly with the scripture. Then I added a 1 because that man actually makes me feel sorry for him. He lacked courage. And yes, I changed it just in case my words had some other value beyond this world... Yeah, in the end one ends up believing it... give a flute to a donkey and if by any chance it sounds, he may think he is a born musician...].

20 June 2025 The Spirit of Truth

Looking back we can see how the Lord has been teaching us according to our capacity to understand and our capacity to assimilate (which is still the case even now as the different ways of God or mercy-guided religions show).
If we read the rules of the Jewish people, which were written by Moses himself at the dictation of God, according to the Scriptures (Leviticus), we see that many were rules of justice, and coexistence. Most of them not only indicated where the sin was, but also how to be forgiven of it (or cleansed). Other rules, beyond religion per se, prevented inbreeding; others, I suspect, prevented the unhealthiness of eating animals that could easily transmit diseases. I suppose then everything would be extremely dirty. There are others that seem circumstantial, regarding offering sacrifices in the Tent of Meeting, since the Tent of Meeting as such does not exist; there is some synagogue (Beit Knesset / Beit Tefillah) that is so considered but does not admit animal sacrifices (the Tent of Meeting is also considered, the destroyed Temple of Jerusalem, one's own home, one's own soul...).
Many of these rules, the fundamental ones, are reflected earlier in the Ten Commandments, and it is these that Jesus says he does not come to change but to fulfil. Why? Because almost all the commandments are fulfilled in love. If you love you do not steal, you do not kill, you do not go with your neighbour's wife, you do not defame anyone, you honour your parents, you do not commit impure acts - if you love God.... And it is true, with the Holy Spirit it is less difficult to love. Before Christ the law was a way to stay within righteousness and even without love one could stumble along it, even if it was made of plank cut-outs that limited the direction to go. After Jesus Christ, after the coming of the Holy Spirit, everything flows smoothly, there are no more planks but a current that carries you full of Life, but when you turn away from it, it does not follow you, but abandons you and leaves you lying, empty. We finally understand the spirit of the law, previously invisible to all, even though those laws precariously sustained their own spirit. That is why the apostles put the works of faith before the law. Not because the law led to death, but because to fulfil rules without knowing why you fulfil them is an empty obligation of life, but, although it did not take them to heaven before Christ because man could not yet possess the Holy Spirit, it did justify many, who were gathered from Sheol by Jesus Christ himself after the Passion.

Rom 2:12-13 For as many as have sinned without law shall also perish without law; and as many as have sinned under the law shall be judged by the law; (13) for it is not they that hear the law that are righteous before God, but they that do the law: they shall be justified.

Well, you see, the unconverted Jews kept those laws. Not only the commandments but also those of Leviticus, making six hundred and some laws that they made immovable. As I was saying the other day, they idolised them because they put them before the Will of God. They didn't understand that man is different without the Holy Spirit than he is when he is able to harbour it. That they can be justified by their laws? Well, Christ said that he would not annul them, but that he was coming to fulfil them. Maybe some are justified, but they have it very difficult because it is like balancing a ball moving between all those boards that guide your way, without really knowing how to play, because you do not know the basis of the game: love, and you think that an eye for an eye and a tooth for a tooth is the coolest thing, and when you are lucky enough to cross paths with someone who hurts you along the way, you are happy to be able to give it back to them in spades. It will be very difficult for a Jew to save himself.
And these were norms dictated by God, but they were for the empty man, dead inside; to set a path of justice, able to justify, making possible a common coexistence for hard-hearted people. When we are already capable of harbouring the Holy Spirit, after the passion, we have passed the course, we potentially have the capacity and the empty law alone is no longer enough, there must be something more if we want to be filled with the Holy Spirit. Hence so much back and forth about the law among the apostles; because they wanted to make their compatriots see it, I suppose.
So to me the Jews are like those four stubborn people who don't get up at mass until the priest says: ‘Let us lift up our hearts to the Lord...’ and not when the prayer begins (as far as I know all the prayers of the Eucharist are done standing up). The Jews are so attached to their customs that they have idolised their rules because they put them before the will of God. And that's the way their hair looks, they can't enjoy heaven on earth and when they die they can hardly get to God (although a thousand years in purgatory, or in the abyss as the scriptures say, cleanses many sins, we don't know).
Scandalous, isn't it? Well indeed, we see the speck in someone else's eye and do not see the plank in our own, because the Jews in general and the Pharisees in particular received those rules dictated by God, according to the scriptures, but you the curia in general, the hierarchy of the Church in particular have received the knowledge of God directly ‘written by Him’. With the aggravating factor that you can receive the Holy Spirit and they could not yet when they crucified Jesus and then it was too late for many who did not want to recognise their error.

Jua 16:7-13 But I tell you the truth, it is expedient for you that I go away: for if I go not away, the Paraclete will not come unto you; but if I depart, I will send him unto you; (8) and when he is come, he will convict the world concerning sin, and concerning righteousness, and concerning judgment; 
(9) concerning sin: because they believe not on me; 
(10) concerning righteousness, because I am going to the Father, and ye shall see me no more; 
(11) concerning judgment, because the Prince of this world is judged. 
(12) I have yet much to say unto you, but ye cannot bear it now. (13) When he, the Spirit of truth, is come, he will guide you into the whole truth; for he will not speak of himself, but what he hears he will speak, and he will tell you what is to come.

And so it has been: the Holy Spirit of Truth has revealed to us what was hidden in the scriptures:
∎ Concerning sin: because they do not believe in me. This the Spirit of Truth has taught us: it was the sin we each personally committed in heaven that has condemned us to pass this test on earth. It says ‘because they believe not in me’ because it is this sin committed in heaven that determines who can believe or not believe here below (Adams who betrayed for love of Eves or Evas who betrayed for greed).
This is the justice of the world: just as the Adams were convinced because of the Eves who listened to the demons (serpent), in the world the Eves will not be able to listen to God, they will continue to listen to the devil and his idols, and can only be converted by the experience of some Adam as the other way around happened in heaven. This is the reason for not being able to believe: their sin in heaven. This is what the Spirit of Truth has revealed to us, it does not speak of our sins of the world. Jesus spoke enough about them during his life among us, not to mention that he did not invalidate the commandments. In fact, many of his teachings were along these lines (parables, beatitudes, beatitudes in Luke...): teaching us the way to live, what is right and what is wrong. Moreover, he gave us the wild card to identify sins: any act of lovelessness. Everything was already spoken about these sins. So, it refers to our sin of heaven, the reason why many cannot believe in Him.

∎ Concerning righteousness for I am going to the Father, and you will see me no more. This is the righteousness that saves us and has been taught to us by the Spirit of Truth: Jesus Christ was the only one who could validate a new nature (man) made for us, as fit to receive the Holy Spirit without any demon (those who were not granted this life-saving nature) being able to brand God as unrighteous. It was Jesus in heaven who validated the heavenly nature (angels and other powers) by pleasing God the Father by loving infinitely, for everything else was created after Him because of that pleasing or validation. Thus, no one belonging to this heavenly nature validated by christ could cry out to justice that He would validate in the same way (by loving infinitely) a new nature man. If Jesus invited you to the party you cannot complain because He invited others different from you. This is the justice for which only He could do it, for which He had to be crucified to save us (I am going to the Father and you will see me no more); it had to be the validating foundation of all who would validate a new branch without there being dependence with the already validated one, for being independent the one could not interfere, judge, claim... anything over the other. Of course it has nothing to do with one disobeying in heaven and Jesus to compensate had to obey in being martyred. That to God would be childish, cruel and totally unjust, ergo, it would be to deny God in Himself, and we know for certain that God Is Who He Is.

∎ Concerning the judgment, for the Prince of this world is judged. This is the judgement which the Spirit of Truth has revealed to us: that which in heaven was temporarily suspended after the betrayal. For there the demons (our brethren) betrayed by hating God because they wanted more Essence of Life (Holy Spirit from the tree of Life), but there were others who coveted it also without hating, the Eves, and finally tThe demon, after being defeated, in the trial for high treason that began in heaven, claimed that he wanted the same fate as the Adams, since they were traitors like them. The devil in the trial for high treason that began in heaven claimed that he wanted the same fate as the Adams, since they were traitors like them. Since God must be perfect and perfectly righteous, and appear to be so, he had no way to condemn the demons without condemning the Adams, even though they did not actually covet his Essence, but were in love and acted out of love. Thus, He could only create a new nature that escaped the previous justice, but if He had done so by command it would have been counted as injustice by the demons as well, for why should they not be given that new nature? Thus, it had to be Jesus Christ who validated man as a new nature fit to receive the Holy Spirit, so that it would be independent or separate from the heavenly nature, all to be done in the same way as the latter was validated: by loving infinitely. Once Christ dies lovingly on the cross, exclusively as a man (with the Holy Spirit apart, without God's help so as not to commit injustice) this nature is validated, and the chains that bound us to the fate of the demons are broken. The blackmail to which God was subjected is broken: if you save them and not us, you will commit injustice because they betrayed as we did (in reality this is false, but God cannot even appear to be unjust; this is particularly reflected in the 2ndTimes of the ‘Psalms from Heaven’, as the traps, lurks and lies made, uttered, against us). And the blackmail is broken because once man can contain the Holy Spirit by himself, God can give this nature to whomever He wishes, without anyone's permission. Therefore, after the passion, the devil loses his shield and is judged, he is already lost, no matter how long the world has lasted since then. And yes, the world continued because all the traitors of heaven had to pass their test, since with or without the Holy Spirit we could again choose the devil and his idols rather than God. This is also part of the righteousness claimed by the devil. Of course we cannot become angels again because that nature for us has been condemned just as the demons have been condemned. The difference is that after paying for our betrayal by destroying our nature, God places us in this new nature of man (first dead nature, then validated), for He can do so by fulfilling all righteousness. While the judgment of the demons in heaven was postponed, their nature was also destroyed, they were no longer angels and no longer men. They remained as monsters with the power to whisper in our ears also to fulfil justice, for in heaven it was these deceptions that caused the betrayal to take place. And so it remained until the passion of Christ, when man was validated to receive the Holy Spirit, and we were saved as something like what we were. Since then the devil knows that he has lost and all that is left for him to do is to torment and turn as many away from God as he can, for that is his monstrous essence, hatred of God and therefore of us. And that will be hell for those who listen to him, for those who follow him, to suffer that immeasurable hatred forever.

 

Notice that in 12 he says ‘I still have much to tell you, but you cannot cope with it now’. It's not that he didn't have time, he had three years and it could have been more if God had wanted it that way, it's just that we couldn't cope with it. It is similar to what happened in the time of Jesus and the Jews. It was at the right time that He was inserted among us. Now, in our day, God has shown Himself and you behave as the Pharisees did then: idolising your rules, everything you are supposed to know. It is exactly the same. For you must know something about yourselves and what has been revealed:
∎ God has made use of the Holy Scriptures to reveal everything, so that everything was already written beforehand, lest you should think that it was invented by someone. If Christ himself were to come down and explain all this to you again, you would not listen to him, for you would think that he was a babbler, or worse, perhaps a devil, for so it is written: "Even the devil can perform signs and signals. In a world where lies, appearances and falsehoods surround us to the point that you can create a video of the Pope denying God and cursing Christ, just by telling the computer, for example, it would have been normal not to believe him. In fact, there are a lot of false prophets out there now. So no, all this does not come from me, all that is revealed is in the Bible.

Isa 48:1 Hear this, O house of Jacob, ye that bear the name of Israel, ye that come out of the waters of Judah. You who swear by the name of the LORD, who call on the God of Israel, but not according to truth and righteousness. 2 For you bear the name of the holy city, and rely on the God of Israel, whose name is the LORD Sebaoth. 3 I have declared of old the former things, and they came out of my mouth, and I made them known; suddenly I did them, and they came to pass. 4 I knew that you are stubborn, that your neck is a rod of iron, and your forehead of brass. 5 Therefore I announced the things to you long ago, and before they came to pass I made them known to you, lest you should say, ‘My idol made them, my statue, my molten image commanded it.’ 6 You have heard all this, will you not admit it? Now I make known to you new things, secret things, not known, 7 which have been created now, not long ago, of which until now you heard nothing, lest you should say, ‘I knew them already.’ 8 Neither did you hear them, nor did you do them, nor was your ear opened beforehand, for I know full well that you are perfidious, and are called rebellious from the womb.

∎ God will not do this without you, without the Church, for so it is written in:

Matthew 16:18: "And I also say unto thee, that thou art Peter, and upon this rock I will build my church; and the gates of Hades shall not prevail against it."
And suggested in:
1 Corinthians 3:17: "If anyone destroys the temple of God, God will destroy him; for the temple of God, which temple you are, is holy."

Well, can you imagine what would happen if all that was revealed were accepted and propagated by a group outside the Church? Would they not oppose the Church and vice versa? It might not be hades, but the result would be the same: the devil would rub his hands together at the sight of the Church being separated from the Truth. We would find ourselves again like the traditional Jews and Christians in the time of the apostles. The difference is that there is no more time. In my opinion, another reason why ‘we could not handle it (John 16:12)’ is that, in justice, God could not unveil everything until the end of time. The reason is that in the end everything will be cut off in an instant and God will not be able to act in anyone's life as He has done throughout history. So, one who lived 200 years ago could say why wasn't the knowledge of God shown to me, I would have been converted. However, this one already had a life history in which he could accept God. Many of us will experience the sudden closure of our lives, hence the justice. Not forgetting that, in reality, it was all there from the time it was written, right under the nose of anyone, including the most studious.
Thus, the hierarchy of the Church can ignore the Word of God, His Will, becoming like the Pharisees of Christ's time. Idolising their golden rules to ignore what is revealed, and then, what will happen? Well, as I was saying about the Jews, it is difficult for them to be saved, although 1000 years of purgatory cleanses many sins (then I feel sorry for them; to try to put pressure on Benedict, I even told him that I would condemn him to hell for my sake, and in the end, just in case, I went around taking years off his purgatory...). What is certain is that it will have serious consequences for the future of all these great pastors, just as it had consequences for the non-converted Jews of the time. The difference, I insist, is that there is no more time.
The Church has to make known what is revealed as such, as a great revelation, a great discovery that scientifically demonstrates God, and not only the Christian God but the God of all religions guided by mercy, for He is the same, the only God. This will be the way for the blind to see and the deaf to hear (Evas), for so it is written that it will happen at the end of time. And I am afraid it cannot be a footnote that will go unnoticed. This world is morbid, it likes the sick, the traumatic, the contradictory. Since what is revealed does not change our faith in its foundation, nor that of others either, but rather gives them fullness, since it is demonstrating them to the eyes of the world, why not present it for what it is: a revolution of life for the living dead?
There are other Words that seem relevant in that the Spirit of Truth will guide us to the full truth in "The prophet who is to come". Note here that the book Isaiah mentions by which the blind will see may be the Bible itself ( with what has so far been revealed), for surely he did not know of himself that it would be included within it.

 

Important to read:
[Random reading of the case I opened is from the introduction to Judges. As such it is not a reading, but a commentary on the Jerusalem Bible. I don't see much relevance except that strange elements are mentioned in the “book”, which could mean that there is something wrong in what is written in this commentary -or maybe in the essay, since this could be what the last link of "The prophet who is to come" talks about, which would be worse-, anyway, I don't see anything very serious that would prevent me from uploading the commentary, although it may not be “certified” as the Lord usually does when I ask Him for a reading to the case. I post the text because you won't find it if you don't have my Bible:

 

"The history of the Judges is referred to in the central part, 2 6-16 31. The moderns distinguish six great judges, Othniel, Ehud, Barak (and Deborah), Gideon, Jephthah and Samson, whose deeds are referred to in more or less detail, and six lesser ones, Sangar, 3 31, Tola and Yair, 10 1-15, Lshan, Elon and Abdon, 12 8-15, who are only briefly mentioned. But this distinction is not made in the text; there is a much greater difference between the two groups, and the common title of judges given to them is the result of the composition of the book, which has brought together elements foreign to each other at first. The great judges are liberating heroes; their origin, their character and their action vary greatly, but they all possess a common feature: they have received a special grace, a charisma, they have been specially chosen by God for a mission of salvation".

There is another option: and that is that it refers to the parts of the text that are a before and an after, since it mentions extraneous elements between the two ‘groups’ of the book. I have tried to make a comparison between the leap from the A.T. to the N.T. with the leap from the N.T. to the revealed, but this non-word (which for me today becomes a Word) makes a big difference between the great judges, who are specially chosen by God, and the little ones, to tell us that the two groups cannot be compared. In other words, the Lord would say something like: do not go too far in comparing what is revealed with what Jesus meant to the Jews of that time (and to the rest of humanity). Well, that's a slap on the wrist, but I was making this comparison to equate the church hierarchy with the Pharisees of the time, not to equate what is revealed here with what Jesus did, obviously. If that seemed to be the case, disregard it, but you should know that the Spirit of Truth, with what has been revealed, answers all that remained to be taught, and since that is so, you should act accordingly. Not to do so is to disregard the will of God, for there is a reason why He reveals things at the time when He does, and He has hidden much, and very laboriously, in so many prophets and Scriptures that now, once revealed, you should not ignore it. And indeed, as this reading indicates, even ignoring what is revealed, we could not equate the Hierarchy of the Church with the Pharisees, but how about comparing them with the difference between Catholics and Protestants? I won't go any further, lest I get another slap on the wrist.]

31 July 2025 Amplifying to discern. Christians, Jews, and Muslims. [Corrected 21 August]

Sometimes parts of the Scriptures are not understood in their full meaning, sometimes they are confused, sometimes they are misunderstood. I have already exposed much of the occult for Christians and Jews (O.T.) in the essay. Now I will begin this commentary by delving, for Christians primarily, into the foreshadowing of Jesus in Isaac.

∎ Christians and the prefiguration of Jesus in Isaac.

This prefiguration gives us more data than it seems. It is of course a very clear prefiguration of Jesus Christ as I have already explained:

Thus, in the Word of Genesis, Isaac, because of the characteristics that coincide with Jesus, especially those detailed in the first part (Isaac and Jesus), we see that he perfectly prefigures Jesus. But the fact that the prefiguration of Jesus is then passed on to the ram places the sacrifice of Jesus (not of the ram) in heaven. For the ram and his sacrifice do speak of the human nature of Jesus and of his passion. Well, I was saying that this foreshadowing tells us more than it seems, because here the characters are Abraham who would be God the Father, Isaac who would be Jesus Christ and God himself who would be the Holy Spirit. I have already made it clear why the Holy Spirit is different (the Bible has made it clear):
Whoever blasphemes against the Spirit shall not be forgiven....
My God, why have you forsaken me?

And to understand this comment we have to think of the Holy Spirit as He Is, because He is the one who gives you Life, but He abandons you if He cannot Live in you, if He cannot merge in you (which in itself is terrifying). We must be very fearful of Him, more even than of God the Father, I dare say, whom I see as closer. Well, just look at this reading of Abraham and Isaac from the commentary; in itself it is equally terrifying: God (the Holy Spirit here) asks Abraham to sacrifice his Son....
If we think that we are begotten in God when the Holy Spirit takes root in us (I have spoken about this in some of the last commentaries), being that it is God Himself who dwells within us when we are in Grace (which makes us happy, quasi immune to the pain of illness, to the fear of death...) and after knowing Jesus' comment on the cross: My God, why have you forsaken me? For the Holy Spirit was withdrawn from Him (figuratively as the perfect garments), to fulfil all righteousness (for it was man's nature that was tested, not God in Himself). Do we not see that it is the Holy Spirit that confers divinity? It happens on a minimal scale with everyone who possesses the Holy Spirit, what happens with the Holy Trinity: one God, three persons; one God in all the persons of men in Grace. Thus the Holy Spirit Is that Precious Essence whose relationship to the person in whom He dwells must be clean and pure, and this is another reason why He departs from us when we sin, why God the Father is perfectly Righteous, for nothing can cloud that fusion with the Holy Spirit, and God Is that which He Is.
Taking all this into account, we can come to the conclusion that in this prefiguration God the Father (Abaham), Jesus Christ (Isaac) and the Holy Spirit (God) are indeed represented in heaven. Because what happened up there was very serious. It is not that a disobedient woman ate an apple and gave it to her partner to taste. It is that 1/3 of the angels betrayed. If, as I claim, Jesus Christ was the first created one who pleased God and by whom all others in heaven were created, was not the very Validating principle of all called into question? Of course Jesus is light and nothing defiles him, and God is just so He will not punish the unguilty even though you insist on teaching otherwise, but let us bear in mind that it was 1/3, one out of 3, and that may call into question the very nature of heaven itself; even more so if we take into account that possibly the faithful angels also claimed justice against the guilty (this is exposed in  the parable of the prodigal son  p.391 ). Perhaps all this is designated as Abraham's willingness to do away with everything, who is capable of killing his son Isaac (Jesus Christ in the heavenly nature according to the prefiguration).
And you will say: what a piece of animal, what he is suggesting. And you, haven't you done away with man's nature just because of a woman who tricked her partner into eating an apple to disobey? And where do you leave the serpent? The serpent is the devil, formerly a precious angel according to Ezekiel. But if one angel, or several angels, rebelled, why were not all the angels punished, just as you say that by one sin entered and we were all expelled? If for disobedience we were all cast out, for betrayal, all the angels should have been exterminated according to you. And yes, we were all expelled, because, even if someone thinks within your absurd thinking that there were only 2 who sinned in paradise and that God expelled only these, He would know how many were behind (the offspring). Moreover, it speaks in the future as a curse to the earth for all and to the woman in general: you will give birth in pain... It was not a particular curse for those two people - Adam and Eve. So why not have exterminated all the angels after the betrayal of that 1/3?
Well, of course God is just and even that 1/3 betrayed did not cause him to punish the other 2/3, so imagine condemning all mankind (that 1/3 of betrayers minus the demons) to a cursed world for the sin of just one (and yes, it is 1/3 judging by several Bible Words that speak of the fall of the third part). Nevertheless, the whole heavenly nature was called to account for what happened, as this foreshadowing indicates.

Thus, what is less visible in this foreshadowing is another confirmation that Jesus Christ is created by God the Father. The relationship, the dialogue, that Abraham and God have here is personal and independent of the son, and what the sacrifice of Jesus in the heavenly nature represents is that willingness of God the Father towards God the Holy Spirit to put an end to that created thing that could keep the Holy Spirit (for that would be sacrificing Jesus in heaven). Once God the Father is willing and the Son generously accepts, without anxiety or greed to safeguard His life, the Holy Spirit throws away His sacrifice and does not reject the rest of the heavenly nature (the non-traitors, the faithful angels) and, in fact, the plan is initiated to save the righteous (Adams) from that heavenly nature that has been bound to the betrayal of the devil (the plan is the creation and subsequent validation in righteousness of the new nature man of which I have spoken so much). Was it so important to test Jesus in heaven? The fact that the devil betrayed God, being an extraordinary beautiful angel, caused the foundations of heaven to shake. What's more, I believe that this beautiful angel, later the devil, was slightly smaller in size than Jesus, the first created (I'm sorry to scandalise you, but to understand it better, we can think of him as being close to God the Father, to the Source, but not in the Source like Jesus). This was the reason why he thought he could ‘defeat’ (God the Father), and this is the reason why, according to this foreshadowing, Jesus was tested in heaven, who accepted the will of God (the Holy Spirit) and Abraham (God the Father) by offering his life, instead of declaring himself in rebellion as Satan did. And it was not that Jesus was specifically distrusted, it was the entire heavenly nature that was called into question, and therefore its validating principle: Jesus himself, the first created.
A Christian cannot accept this without understanding that the person of Jesus was created by God and that this Person was, and is capable of containing the Holy Spirit in the utmost intensity, in that of God the Father. He is capable of containing God, having a created nature and a Divine nature, as happened to him on Earth. He does not change in what He is here below; the brief moment when God departs from him is when the Holy Spirit was withdrawn from him on the cross (My God, why have you forsaken me?), so that man (nature) might be tested, exclusively as man, without the help of God. This moment shows us the difference between his two natures and even informs us that the created nature, in which the person of Christ is found, can be separated from the Holy Spirit, from God; something that could in no way happen to God the Father, who Is who He Is, only to those created by God. God the Father and his Essence, the Holy Spirit, have always existed and are inseparable. And although Jesus Christ is a Person of God because his created part contains his Divine part, that is, he maintains the Holy Spirit at its maximum intensity (that of God the Father), he is subordinate to the Father, which is why he is the Son, and why the Father withdrew the Holy Spirit from him on the cross to test man alone as man. This extremely serious event (separating God from Jesus) is in keeping with the gravity of what this prefiguration in heaven indicates, which I am sure many of you find scandalous. All this, to a lesser extent, happens to any man who keeps something of the Holy Spirit within him, for the Holy Spirit comes and goes, although in our case, not for testing but because of our actions. The moment that Holy Spirit comes to any man, he is begotten in God, he is a son of God, and it is God himself who dwells in that person, and when He leaves us, we die inwardly. We are not some strange walking experiment; we were made in the image and likeness of God the Father in heaven, and our soul, which is what endures, is also made in the image and likeness of God. Since the Passion, in which the validation of human nature (body + soul) took place, we are once again able to hold on to God, because our soul, the main part of our original heavenly nature, was broken in the rebellion in heaven.
Nor can this be accepted without understanding, as I want to make clear, that in heaven during that rebellion (and afterwards also thanks to Jesus), all the angels were capable of containing the Holy Spirit, God, to some extent or intensity. And yes, afterwards too, because the most treacherous (the demons) ceased to be angels, they lost their heavenly nature, yet the continuation of the faithful angels as containers of the Holy Spirit was justified or tested in Jesus according to this prefiguration. And at that moment, our project of salvation was also justified in a new human nature empty of God until the Passion; a nature different from our heavenly nature. Let us bear in mind that we Adams, although traitors, were righteous (unlike the demons) and were part of that heavenly nature that became unstable.
The 7th Plague is another reference in the Bible that tells us how the Holy Spirit (God in prefiguration) intervenes at the end to quickly resolve the rebellion. There, the Hail, hardened Water, kills all those who do not protect themselves under a roof, without distinguishing between the Israelites and the Egyptians. In this action of ‘taking shelter under a roof,’ we can distinguish two key elements: one is moving towards that position (perhaps repenting at the last moment, or becoming part of the faithful angels) and the other is the roof itself, which protects and seems to designate Jesus, as we have seen (I remind you that the 10 plagues p. 244 describe our fall from heaven).

Imagine you are a packaging manufacturer and you make a prototype to contain milk (I have put this example out there). You do a lot of corrosive tests to see if it can hold that milk without the packaging material coming loose and spoiling the milk. After testing, you see that the container has worked well, so it goes into production and you make many more. If you see that one or two of those millions of containers created have been damaged, you will blame it on a manufacturing defect, but if it is 1/3 of all those produced, wouldn't you throw away all the containers, including the prototype, in order to protect that precious milk? Yes, because milk is the most important thing.
Thank goodness God is just and loves each of us personally, but even so, heaven is in shock since the betrayal. For even the heavenly nature was called into question by the rebellion of the third part. And since, although we no longer have the former nature, we still retain our person, the fact that we now fail as men only muddies everything even more. It is like casting doubt now as men on our validating principle, on Jesus, just as that 1/3 of fallen ones cast doubt on him in his heavenly nature. And since the validating principle of this heavenly nature and that of man is the same, it is Jesus, our failure as men somehow strains also the heavenly relationship (angels) with God the Father and God the Holy Spirit. That is why we are called to holiness, not only for our own sake, but to satisfy the Holy Spirit Himself.
From this foreshadowing we can also deduce that Jesus already saved us in heaven, giving rise to the creation of the human nature, and that he does so again, or confirms this salvation in the passion of the cross on earth, making this nature valid to contain the Holy Spirit. But, furthermore, that not only did Jesus validate the heavenly nature by pleasing God as the first of the created ones as we already know, but also that he would have saved this nature after the betrayal of that third part of angels, offering himself generously and with love for the sacrifice in heaven, accepting the will of his Father and of the Holy Spirit. If so, as this prefiguration seems to indicate, there would be a pre-validation in heaven that justifies the angels for the second time and for the first time the empty human nature to be the packaging of those same treacherous but righteous angels (Adams), who become men. In other words, this rehabilitation of the faithful angels and the creation of man as an empty nature to maintain the treacherous angels (not demons), is done at the same moment: that of the offering of Isaac, of Jesus in heaven, and of the willingness of the Father to sacrifice him. Does this seem scandalous to you? And what do you think, that after a third of a trillion angels (as many as stars) rebelled, God would not put them all in order? I already suspected, and I have posted it here, that God ended the rebellion by taking the Spirit away from everyone and then gave it back to the faithful, but I had not found anything about it in the Bible.

So, Jesus is like the older brother who, being innocent, takes all the blame for protecting the little ones. And if Jesus had been sacrificed in His heavenly nature, then all the angels would have been removed (all containers that were manufactured in a manner similar to God the Father, just as the compliant prototype was made, which was the necessary test and foundation for the creation of the rest) to collect that Precious Essence or Holy Spirit, the most important thing (that milk in the containers), but God first acts upon Him, as that prototype or that responsible elder brother who stands up for all the others. Is it any wonder that He speaks of the Holy Spirit in this way, ‘to take away or collect the Essence’? For that is how the Bible speaks of Him: ‘He gave him two talents...’, ‘I will give Him the rule over several cities’ or something like that. Because the Holy Spirit is the most important thing. God the Father created angels as free and independent beings, in His image and likeness, but what gave them Life was the Holy Spirit that they could and can contain. The persons of the angels and our persons (which were created at the same time, for in the beginning we also had a heavenly nature) are created by the mercy of God, but the Holy Spirit, which is the most precious thing, existed before us, it was there all along. These people, ours and those of the angels, are almost like an accident, an addition. We have never been necessary, and neither have the angels.

In short, this prefiguration is a perfect prefiguration. If seen only from the side of the earth, which is how it has always been seen, it would already unequivocally prefigure Jesus, but the coincidence of this prefiguration would end at the moment when God saves Isaac from the sacrifice. If we look at it with the ram in mind, the foreshadowing is, as I say, complete and perfect.

Gen 22:17-18 [for having done this] I will shower you with blessings, and I will greatly increase your descendants as the stars of heaven and as the sands of the sea, and your descendants shall possess the gate of their enemies. (18) By your descendants all the nations of the earth shall be blessed, in return for your obeying my voice".

So, when it then says: because you have offered Isaac as a sacrifice, your descendants will multiply and all the nations of the earth will receive blessings... it means that the new nature of man (in all nations or sizes and religions) will be blessed with the Holy Spirit or the possibility of receiving it, rather. And ‘your offspring will take possession of the gate of their enemies’, that Jesus as man (on earth, offspring) in the passion will close the way, break the bond, which tied us to the demons and which allowed them not to be eliminated. For indeed in the Passion that bond was broken, that door was gained which allowed them to enter and leave at will and to endure from time to time, but the demons were not yet removed to fulfil all righteousness; it is not rhetoric or an ornate way of speaking, it is the reality: ‘gate, door’. Thus, it is not Jesus' ‘offspring’ on earth, which he did not have, but his in heaven (himself as a man on earth). As I say, it is a complete prefiguration.
And in speaking here of the nations, as I always emphasise, it speaks of the different sizes of angels and men, (i.e. souls which is what we have in common with each other - though I suspect the 7 smaller sizes of 12 came to earth, I have spoken of this in Numerology p.195) which designate the 7 mercy-guided religions placed by God to fill those soul sizes. Note that it says: all the nations of the earth will be blessed, when only one nation should be that of Abraham (I suppose this man should be a Jew or will be) and seen only from the earth it does not fit much to talk about blessing all and at the same time of enemies; even more so when the normal thing for the Israelites will be to have some other enemy nation around them. However, it makes perfect sense looking at it from heaven, even if you are scandalised by it.

∎ The Jews.

Well, let's put this foreshadowing in Heaven. For the Jews, who see it from the earth and ignore Jesus, this “offspring” refers to David and another descendant of his who will fulfil all these “promises” that are said in the O.T. But being that Abraham and Isaac are here a prefiguration of God the Father and of Jesus, is it not possible that in other Words in which it speaks of king David so gloriously (pompously, airily, metaphysically...) they are in fact making a prefiguration of Jesus? We know that David was a magnificent king for Israel as was his son Solomon, but we have already seen in Psalm 132 p.186 (belonging to the 9th presentation of the 3 ½ times, of Psalms from heaven or 3 ½ Times in the Psalms) that there David is only a clear foreshadowing of Jesus. And is it not in all cases where it speaks of David in this way? In Psalm 89 p.28 it is also a clear foreshadowing of Jesus. In Jeremiah 23:5 it speaks of a Branch of David, i.e. a substitute to restore righteousness; Greek: sprout that grows on..., not necessarily a descendant. In Spanish it is also renew -see 3.5 Times in Jeremiah-(if they expect a descendant of David now, they won't even jokingly identify him).
Another Word that also seems to be a foreshadowing:

2Sa 7:12-16 And when your days are fulfilled and you sleep with your fathers, I will raise up from your seed one who shall come from your body, and I will establish his kingdom. (13) ‘He shall build a house for My name, and I will establish the throne of his kingdom forever. (14) ’I will be his Father, and he shall be My son. And if he does wrong, I will punish him with the rod and with the scourging of men. (15) ‘But I will not turn away My love from him, as I turned it away from Saul, whom I took away from before you. (16) ’And I will establish your house and your kingdom forever. And thy throne shall be established for ever".

As I say, in that ‘of your lineage’ Jesus seems to be designated for he builds a house for my Name is like saying that he validates the man for the Holy Spirit to dwell in him, and then speaks of establishing your kingdom forever as in other prefigurations. While it might fit with Solomon the son of David who built the temple in Jerusalem, it does not match the Father/son, your kingdom forever, your stable throne forever. Note also that Psalm 132 speaks in the same way of David and not of his offspring in a clear foreshadowing of Jesus. It is worth looking at the full point to see Psalm 132 p.186.

Remember, Yahweh, of David, of all his anxiety, 2 of the oath he swore to Yahweh, of his vow to the Mighty One of Jacob: 3 "I will not enter the tent, my house, I will not go into the bed where I rest, 4 I will not give sleep to my eyes, nor quietness to my eyelids, 5 until I find a place for Yahweh, a dwelling for the Mighty One of Jacob."

On the other hand, speaking of Solomon, did he really make a house for God:

Isa 66:1 The Eternal says: "Heaven is my throne, and the earth is my footstool: where is the house that ye shall build me, and where is the place of my rest?

No. That house is our soul, which once broken in its former heavenly nature destroyed as a consequence of our sin, validates Jesus Christ in the nature of man (body + soul).
Finally, in Matt 22:41-46 Jesus reasons with the Pharisees why he cannot be the messiah son of David, since being his father, by hierarchy he should not call his son ‘Lord’:

Matt 22:41-46 Gospel (N.T.)
Christ, son and Lord of David.
When the Pharisees were gathered together, Jesus put this question to them: ‘What do you think about the Christ? Whose son is he?’ They say to him, ‘David's.’
He says to them, "How then does David, moved by the Spirit, call him Lord, when he says:
The Lord said to my Lord:
Sit at my right hand until I put your enemies under your feet?
If David then calls him Lord, how can he be his son?" No one was able to answer him anything; and from that day on no one dared to ask him any more questions.

Thus, doesn't Jesus seem to want to point out to the Jews that their scriptures did not designate a descendant of David, but prefigured Jesus (regardless of whether or not Jesus was in David's lineage since Joseph was also a putative father, he would never have come from the womb of David as 2 Samuel 7:12-16 affirms)? We have already seen that God has used the history of Israel to designate what happened in heaven, and here is included that way of prefiguring Jesus Christ also with relevant figures of its history. It is curious how the Lord uses what is written to mean different things. The problem of the Jews was believing they were the only ones chosen to be saved, and taking these readings literally, thinking that this messiah would establish a lasting and stable Jewish throne in the world, when we have already seen that they were later invaded by Babylon, and expatriated there or dispersed around the world; the history of the Jewish people is anything but stable, I would say. They could not accept a revolutionary like Jesus when He effectively set up an eternal throne for the strong ones of Jacob (those who pass the test from among the Adams). Far higher was the throne of which the prefigurations of Jesus Christ spoke, to the miserable throne of the world of a supposed descendant of David, a local warrior chief, speaking of the Land, and no disrespect to the Israelites.
In the Jews, this narrow-minded view of the law and of what is written without actually studying the spirit of what is written reminds me in a way of the Muslims.

∎ Muslims.

As I have written several times, Islam is a path guided by mercy that reaches God (Allah). And yes, the prophet Mohamed is the one sent by God to that nation, for God speaks to us according to our capacity and even according to the hardness of our hearts as we saw in the Old Testament. Thus, the prophet Mohamed has a direct and clear way of expressing himself. That is why his way of showing the danger of turning away from the Muslim way for the people of that nation is so forceful. In 237 pages of the Holy Qur'an, I have read, 506 times the words: infidel, impious and associator (which do not designate the same -approximate value, I have only searched for the roots of these words-), generally indicating how bad they will be when they will be judged by God (Allah). These warnings occur in all religions, in all the ways set by God; the ways, as I have already explained, are designed by the Lord for the 7 different types (sizes) of souls that have fallen to earth. God is just and will not ask anything of us that we cannot fulfil.
The problem is that by hearing so many warnings about the infidels and the associators, one can come to despise them to the point of hating them and that is not good for any Muslim, because Allah is merciful and that is what we are all called to, mercy.
These terms on the other hand are sometimes confused.

The infidel.

The infidel, also called a hypocrite, is usually one who has known the Word of the Messenger, but then does not act upon it. In this sense they are equal to the impious. There are many Suras which speak of the infidels as knowing the Qur'an: 4:82-90, 9:73-74, 47:32:

Sura 13:43. The infidels say: ‘Thou hast not been sent!’ Say: ‘God suffices as a witness between me and you, and those who have the knowledge of the Scripture.’

It is true that there are other times when the term infidel seems more general, although after learning that in the time of the Prophet Mohammed there were only minor skirmishes against Christians with whom, however, in different places they got on well, and that jihad or holy war, in the context of his life, was primarily concerned with fighting pre-Islamic Arab cults in defence of the Muslim community, not a generalised war against Christians (although I thought otherwise), most of these ‘infidel’ references may well refer to these pre-Islamic cults.

 

The associator.

The associators are not the people of the Scripture (Jews and Christians), for in many verses a clear distinction is made (Sura 22:17, 98:1, ...). They belong to pre-Islamic cults with such barbaric customs as killing their children to avoid poverty (Sura 6:137,6:151, 17:31, 61:12), which also does not coincide with the people of Scripture. He says that they associate other smaller gods with God, which may refer for example to the Egyptian gods, in which there is a hierarchy (Num, Ra...), however, although the Prophet Mohamed makes a clear distinction, as I say, between people of the Scripture and associators, someone after him said that the associators are the Christians because they associate a son with God. Well, I want to clarify this because this error is part of the hatred that is driving many Muslims to hell. Mohamed already speaks ill of Christians for saying that God has a son and yet he makes this clear differentiation separating the associators and the Christians (and people of the Scripture), although you insist on equating them.
For if one says:
Constant a = 1;
a + 2 = 3
And you change the constant ‘a’ by a variable and equal it to 2, the rest will no longer be fulfilled:
a = 2;
a + 2 ≠ 3

It is you who make the Holy Qur'an contradict itself, and not because of what the Prophet Mohamed wrote, but because you then changed the meaning of his words.

Sura 2.62: The believers, the Jews, the Christians, the Sabeans, those who believe in God and the Last Day and do good, they have their reward with their Lord. They need not fear and they will not be sad.

Thus he is very clear when he speaks, but even if he is clear, one has to be aware of the environment in which he was speaking, so as not to confuse us. These pre-Islamic cults had not converted to Christianity even though by then (around 600 AD) Christianity had spread over much of Europe. They were hard of hearing (not deaf like the Eves, there would be everything there) and so God sent them the Prophet Mohamed. Does this mean that Islam was second fiddle, since they did not convert to Christianity? No. They did not convert to Christianity because they were not called to be Christians, they were to walk the path designed by God for them, Islam, a source of flow suitable for their size of soul. But in that environment, among people who are hard of hearing, even capable of killing their children, for the sake of survival or I don't know why, God sends someone who shouts, for this is the way to speak to the hard of hearing, by shouting.
Thus the Holy Qur'an, though a book guided by mercy, is written in the tone of war (Surah 9:111 and many more) and in an imperative manner, but even in the harshest Suras I have read directed against the associators, who are the worst of the worst in Islam, we discern something more than punishment:

Sura 9:5 When the sacred months are expired, kill the associators wherever you find them: capture them! seize them! siege them! ambush them everywhere! But if they repent, do the azalah and give the azaak, then let them be in peace! God is Oft-Forgiving, Most Merciful.

What would be the wish of the Prophet Mohamed when he taught you this: that the Muslims of that time would kill the associators or that they would convert? Of course the latter, because, in fact, one who has nothing to fight for, does not fight. If you put a knife to one's neck to ask for his bag of coins and he has it empty, he will not fight for it, he will give it to you without thinking. For these are the pre-Islamic cults that Mohammed fought against, cults empty of God. This is probably the reason why there were so many infidels or hypocrites, and why they were named so much in the Holy Qur'an, because of all those who, at the risk of death, falsely converted to Islam.
Many of you are like those who stood in a square in the sun in the summer and were told: ‘Protect yourselves from the heat, for you may die of heat stroke!’ and then at night in the freezing cold they uncovered themselves in bed to protect themselves from the heat. You are even worse because in this example, the word ‘heat’ is the same, only the circumstances change, you have even changed the meaning of words that the Prophet used. And yes, the circumstances are important because today nobody attacks Islam as a religion, but it is even more important for you, I suspect, to change the meaning of ‘associator’ or even to confuse sometimes who the infidel is. And since you understand the Holy Qur'an only in the environment of war in which it was written, so you do not detach yourselves from that war that you carry in your hearts towards those who are not like you, which influences your real environment, which is often surrounded by hostilities with neighbouring nations. How can we stop waging war if the Holy Koran is written in the tone of war? Well, someone has to be the enemy, now the associators will be the Christians! -said that one. You do not realise that God sent the Prophet Mohamed to give you a clear path to Him. It is not easy, however, to follow Him faithfully with the temptations of the real enemy, the devil; but you, besides this danger, you lose yourselves in the things of the world, because it only belongs to the world to make an enemy of another nation or another religion; God will judge after the last day. It is enough for everyone to follow the rules of his religion, including the application of the mercy needed at any given moment, to go around hating others because of their culture, their faith or their nation. Paradoxically, the devil tempts you by using the environment of war in which the Quran was written to transfer it to your hearts and thus make you sick with hatred. For just as water is necessary to forge cement, so war was necessary to convert those hard-of-hearing child-killers to Islam. Many of you are like the fool who pours water on a solid block of cement and tries to twist it around with a stick to mix it. All you will achieve is to break your stick, your own soul; Islam is already firmly set.
Why can't you come to the thought that the Prophet came to? The believers, the Jews, the Christians, the Sabeans, those who believe in God and the Last Day and do good, they have their reward with their Lord. They need not fear and they will not be sad.

I, being a Christian, am sure that the Prophet Mohamed was sent by God to establish Islam as a path in the right direction towards Him for a hardy and pragmatic nation like yours. So much so, that they would never have accepted Christianity because it was not God's (Allah's) appointed path for them. The problem, as I say, is that these pre-Islamic cults of often inhuman customs could only be united with an iron fist and conquest. Many of you every time you read the Holy Quran you settle into the war environment that the Prophet lived in and ignore the best: the rules that lead you to justice and mercy. And since you cannot ignore that environment of war during which Islam was forged, once the worst enemies, the associators (not the infidels because there will always be apostates in any religion, but less so if you do not force them to be part of that religion), were over, you changed the meaning of this word to encompass new enemies. If the Prophet Mohamed knowing what we Christians think of Jesus did not call us associators, why do you? And in doing so, are you not changing the value of all the verses in which that word is mentioned? It is like changing all the pawns in a game of chess to bishops or knights or any other figure, it will no longer work. It is no longer a question of who will win the game, but the rules of the whole game will have changed. For thus you make the Holy Quran contradict itself, when it was written without contradiction. Do you not realise that the Prophet pointed out to you the way to go while he was pushing away with his hands the branches of the forest that prevented you from seeing? Do you not realise that many of you stood and watched the Prophet pushing away those branches, but did not look up to see the way to which he pointed?
Thus, the Prophet Mohammed sometimes speaks well of the people of the Scripture (Sura 2:62; Sura 5:69), making their salvation conditional on the manner in which they act (as indeed Muslims do), not on the veracity of their faith. Moreover, he regards the Bible as words of light - how could it be otherwise? Of course, at other times he speaks ill, in order to separate those paths we walk on, for the Prophet Mohamed must at all costs prevent Muslims from walking with Christian standards, on the Christian path, for that would lead them to hell, because Muslims have a different path from ours, although parallel, directed towards Allah (God). Thus it is perfectly traced by Him (who is Omniscient), because we are different from our first death in heaven and we need different streams to fill different sizes of soul. And yes, the Holy Quran already talks about us being separated from God, and although it does not call it as first death, at that moment we ceased to be what we were. I do call it the first death:

Sura 29:57. Everyone will taste death. Then shall ye be returned to Us.

Even in this war environment the Torah, the Gospel and the Quran are quoted together. It was not the people of the Scriptures who were the enemy, not until you changed it.

Sura 9:111. God has bought from the believers their persons and their property, offering them, in return, the Garden. They fight for God: kill or be killed. It is a promise that binds Him, verily, contained in the Torah, the Gospel and the Quran. And who respects His covenant better than God? Rejoice for the bargain you have made with Him! That is the great success!

In others it seems to speak of both as valid ways.

Sura 5:46-48. And We caused Jesus, son of Mary, to succeed them, in confirmation of what was already in the Torah. And We gave him the Gospel, which contains Guidance and Light, in confirmation of what was already in the Torah, and as Guidance and Exhortation to the God-fearing. (47) Let the people of the Gospel decide according to what God has revealed therein. Those who do not decide according to what God has revealed are the perverse ones.
(48) And We have revealed to you the Scripture with the truth, in confirmation and as a guardian of what was already of the Scripture. So decide between them according to what God has revealed, and follow not their passions, which turn you away from the Truth which you have received. To each of you We have given a standard and a way. God, if He had willed, would have made of you one community, but He wished to test you in that which He gave you. Compete in good works! You will all return to God. He will inform you of what you disagree about.

In confirmation of the beginning of this Surah (47) we find this in the Bible:

2Co 4:3-4 And if as yet our Gospel is veiled, it is veiled to those who are perishing, (4) to the unbelievers, whose understanding the god of this world has blinded to prevent them from seeing the brightness of the glorious Gospel of Christ, who is the image of God.

I would add that many aayahs speak of fighting the infidel, but usually they generally put some condition of self-defence (attacking those who drove you out of your homes, those who attack you Suras 2:190-193) or defence of Islam itself (tempting is more serious than killing) speaking, as it usually does, in a warlike tone and sometimes encouraging, or justifying the Muslim, to do what he does not like to do (killing in that war). In others it invites to fight with those of the Scriptures (Jews and Christians), until they pay the tribute Sura 9,29. This tribute, I believe, is part of the Shari'a (which I am completely unaware of) and seems to be also a tribute to finance this war (remember, in the Prophet's time the enemy was especially the pre-Islamic cults - notably the associators), although they are still being paid today.

Finally, for those who think they are so clever as to correct the Prophet by saying that the associators are the Christians, when for him they were not, judging from the many Suras in which he differentiates between them, I will try to determine who these associators really were. Let us see:

Sura 6:137 Thus those whom they associate have caused many associators to believe that it was right for them to kill their children...

This ‘whom they associate’ is plural, it is not Jesus associated with God. It is true that it is an interpretation of the Quran since it is an English translation, but others I have seen are along the same lines:

Sura 6:137 Likewise, there are many idolaters to whom the associates whom they ascribe, make it seem good to them to kill their own children....

So, it occurs to me that these associates are what we Christians call idols, or gods written with lower case letters. You can make an idol out of almost anything: power, sex, money, affections, anything you put before God. Paradoxically, you can even make an idol out of your religion when you do not understand it well and fanatically do what God does not want you to do under the pretext of that religion. In the Prophet's environment, it occurs to me that there were people who associated God with a worldly benefit that He was supposed to bring to His followers. It is true that God provides, but He is not going to make us rich in money by following Him. Neither is there a god of war that makes you stronger fighting, or a god of fertility... But all this is just a curiosity, the important thing is to know that the Prophet did not refer to the people of the Scripture when he spoke of the associators (the root associad- comes out 98 times in the Quran) so whoever refers to Christians as associators, taking the Quran itself as a pretext, is twisting and obscuring the Holy Quran 98 times. And worse still he who deceives others by so teaching, for he teaches the message of God to your nation with contradictions when it has none.

∎ The Qur'an's corrections to the Gospel.

God revealed to Prophet Mohamed truths that even Christians do not know, but He also showed him realities as differences; it does not mean that Prophet Mohamed was wrong, it was as Allah (God) showed him to keep the two ways separate, for they had to be kept separate in order to be suitable for both nations.

∎ Jesus Christ was created.

Indeed, this was revealed to the Prophet Mohamed: Jesus Christ was created directly by God (Allah), and so it was in heaven (Sura 29:57 ... you will be returned to Us) and on earth. Christians do not understand this because they do not understand the mystery that for them is the Holy Trinity: One God in three persons. They seem to place Jesus Christ at an infinite point in time next to the Father, when this is not so. The Father and His Essence, the Holy Spirit, live outside of time, forever. And yes, it is His Essence, the Holy Spirit in some intensity, that indwells us when we are in His Grace. It is not infinite God because we would burst. Even everyone can be more or less full of God (Allah), this can be confirmed by those Muslims who have felt Allah within themselves. Not everyone can feel it, neither can all Christians. And this is the principle of the Holy Trinity, that God can dwell in your person and in the person of others and still be One God. It has not been revealed to Muslims that when God dwells in you, you are begotten in Him as His child. Carrying God within you, the Holy Spirit, is not like carrying a box of bananas, it is carrying God who becomes one with you to make you feel great inside, happy in the face of sickness and the hardships of life (I have already spoken about this in a previous commentary). I do not say this to convince any Muslim, for they must follow the path that Allah (God) has provided for them through the Prophet Mohamed. I say this so that you will see that we are going in the same direction and so that many of you will stop hating, for it will lead you to hell. If I were like these haters, I would look at you with haughty eyes and a face of disgust, saying, ‘Now, you will see how many of you will be surprised when you receive flames from hell, instead of the expected garden grass...’ and then I would leave you in quietness. I would refer to proving God as I have already done, irrefutably making Christianity the only true religion, but I know that God also set Islam as the true faith for your nation, so, although it would be easier for me, all the fools whom the devil deceives into hating others would fall on my conscience. It is my duty to denounce your sin, what you do once you know it is up to you.
I was saying that God has willed to reflect Himself in the nature that surrounds us, and has made our own nature similar to how we were in heaven. That is why we say that a son of ours carries our blood, and so, similarly, when someone holds within him the Holy Spirit (Allah in some intensity), he is considered a son of God, he is begotten in God even after he is born, say the Gospels. For the angels and we were originally created to hold that Life, to hold the Holy Spirit (God, Allah), but we separated ourselves from Him and fell dead inwardly to the world by our betrayal. There, to heaven, we will have to return, but full of Allah (God). Thus, for us Christians, Jesus Christ was the first created one who pleased God and by whom the angels and other powers in heaven were created. Although all angels and any man who holds the Holy Spirit within him is a son of God (Allah), we call Jesus the Only-begotten, because being the first-born, he is the only one who holds the Essence of God in the highest intensity, in that of God, because he is at the very source, next to the Father. But for Christians there is also only One God.
So indeed, Jesus Christ was created directly by God, in heaven and on earth. The prophet Mohamed dismisses the mystery of the Trinity and proclaims the same result: that there is only One God.

 

∎ The differences:

The Holy Quran says that Jesus was a prophet, but states that he was not born of man, nor did he die making him different from any prophet of any time.
The Holy Quran says that Jesus did not die on the cross, but that it appeared that he was crucified.

Sura 4:157. and for having said: ‘We have put to death the Anointed One, Jesus, son of Mary, the Messenger of God’, being that they neither killed him nor crucified him, but it seemed so to them. Those who disagree about him doubt. They have no knowledge of him, they follow only conjecture. But they certainly did not kill him, (158) but God raised him to Himself. God is mighty, wise.

That is to say, it does not question that they believed they saw him; they were not lying when they said so, because they believed they saw him (it seemed that way to them), so it is like saying that for the world he was crucified. If there were bad intentions on the part of the Gospel with the objective of glorifying Jesus it would have been better to have said: ‘Jesus did not die on the cross, but we saw how God took Him for Himself’, making Him different from any other man. If we had all seen how God took him to Himself, why talk about a resurrection? There have already been other resurrections not only in miracles of Jesus Christ but also of the prophet Elijah (Old Testament). But Allah (God) made Prophet Mohamed see it this way, why? Because that is how it should be to keep our ways separate.
However, it is curious how Allah (God) revealed to him something that the Christians did not understand: they believe (I exclude myself here), that Jesus Christ was crucified in order to obey and thus counteract the disobedience of ‘Adam’. When Jesus Christ was crucified in order to, by dying in forgiveness, i.e. by loving infinitely, make man's nature valid as worthy to receive the Holy Spirit. Had He not loved to the end, Jesus would have died as what He is, able to maintain the Holy Spirit in maximum intensity. But He did not die as such, so it seemed to those led by the demons that haunted Him (‘heal thyself’). What does this sound like to us? Because Jesus did not die as such, all men can keep God (the Holy Spirit) within us. He validated the human nature as He validated the heavenly nature (angels) at the beginning of time to receive God (for He was the first created and as such pleased God).
Anyway, as I say, Muslims do not have to be Christians because with a very high probability they would fall into hell, as the Christian way is not for them (and it is the same for us Christians with Islam), but understanding Christians can make many whose hearts are at war and full of hatred towards non-Muslims to be saved and not fall into Satan's flames of hatred. Let us remember: as Allah is merciful, so the father of hatred is Satan and those who hate are his property.

I believe that only a monster (in the full sense of the word) can kill women and children, and indeed anyone without motive of self-defence. Many, too many, who expect to see green garden grass, after death, will be very surprised to suffer the flames of Satan's hatred. We Christians are told that if you do not warn your brother that he is sinning when you see him sinning, you bear his sin too. I don't know if there is anything similar in Islam, but I do know that correcting your brother who is about to fall straight into the abyss is merciful and that is what we are all called to do, for God (Allah) is merciful.
The devil uses any means, including misinterpreting the holy scriptures, to take as many people as he can to hell. Thus, Muslims have a very serious problem, because in addition to the Eves, present in all the ways of God, who do not listen even though they may appear otherwise in Muslim communities (not in Christian ones, for among us one can freely declare oneself deaf or a lost idiot), many of their ‘Adams’ are filled with hatred towards the non-Muslim, making them incompatible with Allah (God) the merciful, for if the prophet Mohamed reasoned that statement in Sura 2. 62: "The believers, the Jews, the Christians, the Sabeans, those who believe in God and the Last Day and do good, they have their reward with their Lord. They have no need to fear and they will not be sad", why does the average Muslim not reason the same? As I say, for the Adams to be lost is, if anything, more painful for God, for it is these, the Adams, who have their ears open to Him, whom the Lord is most interested in saving, for they did not betray out of greed but out of love in heaven. And this hatred is not only seen in those psychopaths who confuse the meaning of jihad and who have already earned hell, but in the general Islamic culture that isolates itself from non-Muslims in the conviction, not only that the Muslim is the only chosen one, but also that the others are condemned and more or less deserve death for not being Muslims. Genesis already said this about the Ishmaelites (and I have commented on it elsewhere):
Gen 16:12 He shall be a human onager. His hand shall be against all, and the hand of all against him, and he shall pitch his tent against all his brethren. [onager = wild donkey].
“In front of all their brothers” (i.e. they will live in isolation from their brothers, not among them). And this Word of the Bible was written 3000 years ago or more, see if the Lord is Omniscient and how He had a way planned for them. Well, it is a very different culture to the Christian one, and it is not about being friends; that is as difficult as an older brother being friends with a younger brother (regardless of which one is older), because the older brother has his own friends, his own way of being and the younger brother has his own, however, the bonds of brotherhood should be much stronger because we share so much, and if the blood ties are strong how much more to share the Holy Spirit among all (One God in all people in His Grace). It is a matter of returning as many of us as possible to God (Allah), to Allah (God), because He loves us all equally.

So, many are the words of the Gospel that for Muslims have been corrected. Why? To keep our ways separate and also to simplify or make their faith more understandable. They of course have no headaches with the mystery of the Holy Trinity and come straight to the same place as Christians: there is One God. As a note I add that Christ never says ‘my Father’ but ‘the Father’, which also refers to our affiliation as children of God when we are in His Grace.

Gospel of John 8:28
So Jesus said: When you have lifted up the Son of man, then you will know that I am He and that I do nothing of my own accord. What I say is what the Father has taught me;
Gospel of John 10:30
The Father and I are one.
Gospel of John 10:34-38
Jesus answered: Is it not written in your Law: I said, you are gods?
So it uses the word 'gods' of those people to whom the word of God was addressed -- and scripture cannot be set aside.
Yet to someone whom the Father has consecrated and sent into the world you say, 'You are blaspheming' because I said, 'I am Son of God.'
If I am not doing my Father's work, there is no need to believe me;
but if I am doing it, then even if you refuse to believe in me, at least believe in the work I do; then you will know for certain that the Father is in me and I am in the Father.
Gospel of John 11:25-27
Jesus said: I am the resurrection. Anyone who believes in me, even though that person dies, will live,
and whoever lives and believes in me will never die. Do you believe this?  'Yes, Lord,' she said, 'I believe that you are the Christ, the Son of God, the one who was to come into this world.'
Gospel of John 14:10
Do you not believe that I am in the Father and the Father is in me? What I say to you I do not speak of my own accord: it is the Father, living in me, who is doing his works.
Gospel of John 17:5
Now, Father, glorify me with that glory I had with you before ever the world existed.
Gospel of John 20:28-29
Thomas replied, 'My Lord and my God!'
Jesus said to him: You believe because you can see me. Blessed are those who have not seen and yet believe.

There is also foreshadowing of Jesus Christ in the Torah where he is spoken of as the savior of men. Some of these are described in the section:  Foreshadowing of Christ.

∎ What is important.

The important thing is, of course, to believe that there is One God. The next thing is to be merciful as Allah, God, is merciful. But, in addition, to observe the rules and observances of your religion. For faith is lived in deeds; someone who does not believe will not take restrictions on his life, on the contrary, he will live all the idols of the world, all the pleasures he can, without thinking about the last day or where he will end up afterwards. However, he who strives has his reward. And this also works for the people of the world: the more exercise a gymnast does, the more self-realised he feels at the end, perhaps this is a sign for everyone to understand. The Holy Spirit (God within us) is likewise quantified: the more mercy shown the more of Him that dwells within you. As we all have a size of soul, these are grouped into nations, or religions rather, because we all have a minimum amount to fill in order for our soul, once released from the body, to ascend towards God (Allah), or if you like, to remain in God after life on Earth. And we also have a maximum limit (this is the limit that the angels who revealed themselves in heaven wanted to break), that is why we need different streams to fill ourselves with the One God (Allah), because, although brothers, we are of different sizes. And yes, the efforts to come closer to Allah (God), even if they do not seem to be produced by mercy, like going to the mosque or church and keeping the fasts, making those pilgrimages..., will also be changed by the Holy Spirit within us; we may not feel it on earth, but it will also come after the judgement of the last day. This is the reason for the different paths set by Allah, God, to fill us with Him. Parallel paths in the good direction guided by His mercy, and towards mercy. Guided towards Him. Remember: God will never ask anything of us that we cannot fulfil, live, accomplish. He is just and merciful.
And just as it is more difficult to exercise mercy with an enemy than to exercise mercy towards a neighbour, so it is much more difficult to exercise mercy with a heart at war than when you have it at peace, for mercy is to be kind, just, to the miserable, to the one who is not like you, to the one who is not in your condition. And he who is not merciful is unlikely to find mercy, for all that we do in the world will be repaid in one way or another after the last day.

24 August 2025 My God, my God, why have you forsaken me? [Corrected 25 August]

These words of Jesus on the cross speak to us of his two natures: the created nature and the Divine nature. Jesus Christ is the person created by God the Father who holds within himself the Holy Spirit in the highest intensity, that of the Father. That is why he has both a created and a Divine nature.
God is who He is. He cannot abandon Himself, because He would cease to be.
The words of Jesus on the cross confirm that this second nature, the divine nature, can even abandon the created nature. Nothing like this could happen to God the Father, since He, together with the Holy Spirit, is who He is.
While writing the previous comment, I came across this evidence, or argument if you will, for those who claim that Jesus Christ was not created by God. The Church does not even investigate the Holy Trinity, as they consider it to have been revealed to them as an indecipherable mystery. And so, it concludes that Jesus Christ is a Person of God without origin, that is, eternal in time, equating him with the other two Persons. It is true that we cannot explain God as men, because to begin with, the concept of infinity and timelessness escapes us, and so for us He is inexplicable, but I believe that we can understand the Holy Trinity. In other words, we can explain that of Three Persons one God. So, to begin with, let us separate their persons to see if we can simplify and thus understand it.
God is who He is. He cannot abandon Himself, because He would cease to be.

This obvious fact can help us discern the person of Jesus. For it is this person who says, ‘My God, why have you forsaken me?’ In other words, it is the Essence of God that abandons him. The Bible tells us that the Holy Spirit is different from Jesus in status, it seems (‘you can insult me, but whoever blasphemes against the Holy Spirit will not be forgiven, either now or after death,’ or something like that, He says). Furthermore, if you have studied the Bible even minimally, you will know that the Holy Spirit is often referred to as clothing, and just before the cross, his perfect robe (made without seams) was taken from him, to indicate that it is the Holy Spirit in his utmost intensity who is removed, not the Person of God the Father who ‘abandons’ him.
I have explained the reason many times before: human nature alone, without God's help, had to be tested in love in order to be validated as a suitable vessel for receiving the Holy Spirit, since the heavenly nature of the traitors whom God is trying to save (mainly Adams, but in the end Eves will also be able to hear) was broken after the rebellion. Thus, if Jesus as a man, without God's help, validates man, any other man after him will be able to receive the Holy Spirit.
And at that moment on the cross, was Jesus a person of God? No. He was just a man. It was his person that was tested, but he did not have God within himself; he was not a person of God at that moment. At any other time, Jesus maintains the Essence of God, the Holy Spirit, in the utmost intensity, equal to that of God the Father, and that is why He is a Person of God. But, as the relationship between the words father/son shows, He is subordinate to the Father, and this is why the Father can cause the Spirit to leave Him, He can take away the Holy Spirit. The words father and son also speak to us of anteriority/posteriority in time, as well as creation. Because, in fact, when we speak of the person of Jesus, we speak of creation; when we speak of His Divine nature (that Holy Spirit which He maintains in its maximum intensity), we speak of Him being begotten, because it is that Holy Spirit which begets Him in God (Him and all men who are in Grace after the Passion), but the person of Jesus is created by God the Father. Thus, we find two natures, one created by God the Father and the other Divine, which begets Jesus and is not created, it is the eternal Holy Spirit, without origin, in maximum intensity.

This is evident and almost a mathematical proof: ‘God is who He is, He cannot abandon Himself, because He would cease to be,’ should be enough to change some concepts firmly rooted in the Church. And it is not that this is bad, nor does it change the situation too much, for Jesus also has a Divine nature, but understanding the person of Jesus helps us to understand ourselves as well. Because from Jesus, who is first among all created beings, followed by the angels, all were created in the image and likeness of God: a person with a size capable of containing, to one degree or another, the Holy Spirit, God. As for man, given that our origin is heavenly, we were already included in that angelic creation, and now as men, after having lost that nature through our betrayal, we retain our soul that contains our person and our capacity (since the Passion) to contain the Holy Spirit, that is, in what is important, we continue to be made in the likeness of God. And yes, just as we say that there is only one God in three Persons, we can say that there is only one God in all persons in Grace (or who maintain the Holy Spirit to some degree). Since Jesus Christ had to prove his human nature as a man alone, for otherwise it would have been unjust and deceitful, and he would not have been able to justify this new nature in the face of the devil's accusations, we can say that it is indeed God who abandons him from within himself. It is not like saying, ‘Hey, why have you forgotten me and let this happen to me?’ It is a real abandonment necessary to test ‘man.’ This being so, we deduce that what confers Divinity on Jesus is that Essence of God or Holy Spirit that abandons him, and this Divinity is different from the created person of Jesus, or from his real person (otherwise, those words from the cross would not fit: My God, why have you forsaken me?). Or what do you think? Did Jesus not know what awaited him on the cross? Did he expect that at the last moment God would deliver him from that cross, and when he saw that he was not being saved, he said that? No. It was the Holy Spirit who abandoned him, and he did not know that this was going to happen; he did know that he would die under torture: ‘My Father, if it is possible, let this cup pass from me; but not as I will, but as you will.’ Jesus also loses something of that Spirit when he touches the woman with the haemorrhage: ‘Power has gone out from me.’ Furthermore, if he had said to the Father, ‘Why have you abandoned me?’, thinking that he had abandoned him in that torture, in the face of that traumatic event, we would be saying that he regretted offering himself as a sacrifice, when that is not the case. He accepted the sacrifice, but he missed the Holy Spirit within himself, God. That must have been the most horrible thing of all.
As I said, it was enough just to look at the words Father and Son, but even if we ignore them, we cannot ignore that phrase spoken by Jesus on the cross.
So, if we go back in time, we can think that God, before creating the person of Jesus Christ, was the person of God (at that time He was not Father) and His Essence was the Holy Spirit, that is, two persons. For all of us, including the angels, and even for the Father, God now has three persons, since Jesus Christ, although created, is in the Source, maintaining the Spirit at its maximum intensity, the same as God. In addition, through Him, the rest of the heavenly creatures were created. But going back to before the creation of Jesus Christ, when there were two persons, God was happy and needed nothing, for He is love, and this love is shared between Him and the Holy Spirit, for when the Holy Spirit dwells in you, you love Him intensely. I have always said that the person of the Holy Spirit is more intuitive, different from the Father and the Son, for I see Them as more concrete, as if you could talk to Them. However, the Holy Spirit has qualities of His own that also make Him a person. To begin with, He cannot live with evil, or with sin, or rather, with lovelessness, and He intertwines or merges with the one in whom He dwells, making you different, because you approach the things that happen to you with love, and therefore external evil does not harm you in the same way. But even though He is united with you, He lets you make your own decisions, He does not take away your freedom, and when you prevent that love from flowing (because of your sin), whose origin is in the Holy Spirit, He abandons you. Thus, the Holy Spirit is like a source of love that springs from within you to meet your own love (if you respond) and flow outward toward other people. If one has a good measure of the Holy Spirit within oneself, one can become enraptured in a mutual love with one's Holy Spirit. We have seen this in some saints and literate monks who wrote about the Spirit as true lovers.

Thus, at that moment, without Jesus Christ yet, the person of God (not yet the Father) creates the person of the Son in his image and likeness. This means that He makes Him independent of Himself in person, with His own mind, and enables Him to receive an immense amount of the Holy Spirit, an amount equal to his own. And so the Son was created, and this new person responded with such infinite love that it corresponded to the love of the Holy Spirit dwelling within him, thus pleasing God the Father, and through Jesus the pleasing one, God the Father created all others. It is important to know that the Holy Spirit contained in Jesus was the same as that of the Father. There is only one God. It is not that it was a different ‘bag’. It is that Jesus was in the Source, where the Father is, and from there the Holy Spirit flows with maximum intensity. The other created beings were not in the Source but at different distances or with different capacities, if you will. The best example to see this is a Light that comes out of a source and passes through all those who are transparent, because when there is sin and one looks at oneself, one becomes opaque and the Holy Spirit cannot enter you. This happened to the rebellious angels who, by falling out of love and coveting for themselves, became darkened and the Holy Spirit abandoned them. Although the faithful angels fought before, that was the end of the rebellion, as we have seen in the Plagues that signify our fall from heaven. And in reality, we in the world also unintentionally become darkened when we go about with a frown, on guard against attacks that may come from others, or when we are constantly thinking about the next task in the world that we have to perform. Because we do not enjoy God within us and we pay attention to the world before Him, which is the perfect definition of making an idol of the world. And this happens to many of us who call ourselves practising Christians, so imagine a deaf person. Writing this, I realise that it also happens to me when I write about worldly things, so I will remove any political references from the essay (the manifesto and Islam today). Anyway, it is not easy to get used to looking at everyone around you as your beloved brother, but you can try with effort and perseverance, and the Holy Spirit will help you. Somewhere I said that fools have an advantage over the intelligent, because they often do not realise the traps or bad intentions of which they may be victims, whereas the intelligent are more likely to be on their guard, ready to defend themselves with an appropriate comment or respond with a hurtful one. We must change the way we look at others and turn off our defence mechanisms. Perhaps then we will become transparent to the Holy Spirit.

 So, isn't it easier to understand a God who is ‘binary’ in origin, who creates us in his image and likeness, in a binary way (soul or container with our person and his own Essence or Holy Spirit—for that is how he created us in the beginning in heaven, capable of maintaining the Holy Spirit and already permeated by Him; that was our birth full of Life)? Can we understand that God creates us with our person, our freedom, our ability to think, and can we understand that He has also created us with the ability to contain the Holy Spirit, God? Yes? Then you have understood the Holy Trinity. Or did you think that God created us in the image and likeness of the Holy Trinity? No. We were created in the image and likeness of the Father, who is capable of maintaining His own Essence, the Holy Spirit. And we are also like the Son, but because He was made before us in the image and likeness of the Father. As angels, the creation truly made in the image and likeness of God the Father, I suppose we would not have bodies. We would be those souls filled with the Holy Spirit, free in movement. Now, it seems a little strange to imagine this, like a science fiction film, but what do you think? Did angels have human bodies with wings? I suppose not. If they had an outer shell like the human body, it would not weigh them down. Rather, it seems that our nature as humans is weighed down by this body, as punishment or degradation for what we were because of our betrayal.
It is true that all this about the Holy Trinity is easier to understand for those who have ever felt God within themselves, because man is an independent being; we do not share our blood with each other, but each of us contains our own. And this is part of the test, because empathy with others, love for our neighbours among our ‘people’ is what we are called to do in order to reproduce what happened in heaven, to return to what we once were. There, in sharing the Holy Spirit, love was the normal relationship. It was full communion, and not only because of the Holy Spirit that they all shared, for there has always been only one God, but because of the love that came from their persons (until one, the devil, brought in iniquity). And in the world before the cross, could they be saved if they were not able to receive the Holy Spirit? Yes, because in fact, Jesus loves on the cross as a man without having that Holy Spirit. Perhaps those who died before Christ were not required to do the same, but they did have to be righteous. It is for them that Jesus Christ comes down (into Sheol) when, after the Passion, He makes human nature fit to receive the Holy Spirit, because without the new nature no one could remain in heaven after losing their heavenly nature as punishment for our betrayal (this is part of the justice demanded by the devil; I have already written extensively on the subject). And was everything easier after the cross? After the cross, we can now receive the Holy Spirit, but it is still difficult, because the devil tempts those who possess It most, the Holy Spirit is like a magnet for him because He is his fiercest enemy and he does everything possible to make us sin and abandon Him. But there is also another problem, which is that not all men are open to the Word of God. I have already explained that the Evas, in justice, for having caused the Adams to fall, will not be able to hear God on earth and will only be able to receive God through the experience of some Adam, as conversely happened in heaven according to listening to the devil. That is why Jesus says that He does not come to bring peace but a sword, because after the Passion, those two sides, the deaf (the Eves) and those inscribed in the Book of Life (the Adams), will be much more differentiated. Until then, no one could receive the Holy Spirit; afterwards, naturally, only the Adams could. So we must not only fight against the devil, now more virulent towards those who have more Spirit, but also against the Evas who have their ears open to the idols of the world and treat us as if we were mad or try to beguile us with those idols, as already happened in heaven with the ‘apple’.

Much has been revealed to the Church lately through the exegesis of the scriptures, and yet they continue to do nothing. Fundamental pillars are being shaken, and it is true that they are not being torn down, because the fundamentals are still there, but even so, they remain still as statues. They do not realise that God is urging them on, that things happen when God wants them to happen. Of course, then there are some accelerated priests who add their own ideas to try to change what, in my opinion, does not need to be changed. The other day I went to the Jesuit Church of the Sacred Heart in Malaga, because as we are in Feria, the church I usually go to is closed. There, a young Brazilian priest with a small bun and beard was saying Mass, and during the offertory he said: ‘Blessed be You, Lord, God of the Universe, for this bread, fruit of the earth and the work of man AND WOMAN’. I immediately wondered what this young man would say if he had to talk about man’s nature. Man’s woman's nature? Without forgetting that the word ‘man’ comes from homo, which refers to our entire nature, and even though it later became differentiated, isn't it clear that it represents all of humanity, as it did in the beginning? Well, this guy comes from Brazil, a populist country, or rather communist at present as far as I understand, and perhaps he has been brought up on inclusive language, but it struck me that this nonsense has also reached the priests, even more so when, as he mentioned in his presentation, he is studying for a doctorate in Rome.
But that's how things are, we open ourselves up to the things of the world, as Pope Francis also did on occasions, and when it comes to the important things, we do nothing. Well, God will decide...

9 September 2025 On the maintenance of the Holy Spirit. (10 September clarification on wine and wineskins)

I know there are those who want me to say something horribly unjustifiable so that they can dismiss everything presented in this essay and on this website, and say, ‘Gotcha!’ The reason may be that I dare to question the unquestionable foundations of the Church, and none of us like to have our comfortable resting place disturbed. Although I am nobody and my voice is not even heard, the evidence presented here is so clear that it cannot be ignored by them. Another reason may be that to accept the revelations in this essay would be to accept that the world is going to end, because in practice, we would be filling ourselves with the knowledge of God, a preliminary step to the end.
Well, today I am going to please all those who want to label me as crazy, because I am going to share my recent experiences with the Holy Spirit, and I will do so in a way that may help some of you to feel it, even if I have to give my own perceptions, which are surely subjective and also difficult to understand, just as any madman would express them.
I already made a comment about the Spirit on 30 May 2025, and I don't think I mentioned then that the easiest way to receive the Holy Spirit is through good spiritual exercises, but today I am not going to talk about all the ways to receive it, but rather about how to maintain it and perhaps how to feel it.
What we have always heard about the Holy Spirit is true: it is like a baby that needs to be cared for so that it can grow inside you. And as such, it is very weak; or rather, it is we who, in our weakness, sin and cause it to disappear. And what does a baby need? Of course, it needs to be fed, but most of all, it needs to sleep. The Holy Spirit within us needs silence, and I am not referring to external silence, but internal silence. External silence is interesting, but it is not essential.
If you are one of those who verbalise your thoughts, you are already disturbing the rest of the baby, the Holy Spirit. This used to happen to me and still does, but I am correcting it, and I suppose many others do too, because I have often heard the question: ‘What language are you thinking in?’ But I go further. Thoughts that are not ‘verbalised’ internally also hinder our relationship with the Spirit, because these thoughts are usually about the banalities of the world, about our pending tasks, about what we think of someone or some situation. Moreover, it is the main gateway for attacks from the devil, as it is always available; there is no need for a situation to arise in the world to test you. These evil thoughts can even enter your mind with a memory in which you consider the choices you could have made but did not make, or in which you justify yourself by blaming someone else for something that has happened to you, or in a thousand other ways of judging your surroundings. But above all, the problem with these thoughts is that they are noise. Inner noise that clouds that relationship with the Spirit to the point that we do not even feel it.
Notice how the devil uses this so that even the Holy Spirit cannot grow a little, lest we feel Him and be strengthened by Him. The devil knows us, he has at his disposal our entire library of memories and, of course, access to our thoughts. Thus, he will bring us painful or simply embarrassing memories to trouble us, that is, to distract us from what is important: introspection about our soul. There are moments when we are especially weak, and it is just when we wake up that we find ourselves in that light sleep. It seems that at that moment, when our consciousness is running at half speed, the devil can freely access that library and mix it with evil thoughts to display them in our minds. His hand can also be seen in some mental illnesses. I know this may sound anachronistic, but I believe that the devil may have something to do with the onset of some of these illnesses. There are those who continuously count from 1 to 10 or even 20... and then start again. This illness has a name that I cannot remember, and it seems to be caused by a trauma that one wants to forget and covers up with numbers so as not to access those memories; memories that may be repeatedly sent by the devil... Again, it is noise (perhaps changing the list of numbers to a mantra such as ‘love, humility, love...’ might help if the devil has something to do with it). I knew someone who had a habit of counting the digits on number plates so that they added up to 23, convinced that many number plates did so. In this case, it occurs to me that it would be best not to look at the number plates. Others have a habit of constantly moving one leg; this used to happen to me, and although it is not as serious as the inner noise, it is another type of noise (I am not talking about tics, I think that is something deeper).
Anyway, I was going to tell you about my experience, what I have done to feel the Holy Spirit again. It is something very simple, but very difficult for me to do. Don't think. That is, when you're walking down the street or through the park or up a mountain, don't think. This doesn't mean you're going to walk into a wall, because without thinking you're unintentionally heading to where you're going. Since this is very difficult to do, not thinking about anything, you end up exploiting your sense of sight to avoid thinking. If you try it, you will realise that you notice all the details of what you are looking at, and that you will immediately move on to look at something else to prevent thoughts from arising, to keep your brain quiet by observing only the tiniest details of what you see, but without reasoning about what you see. If you do this, you will realise that you are looking at the tops of buildings as if you were a tourist and had never walked down the streets you have walked down 100 times before. Of course, it is important to do this for one purpose only: to keep yourself silent, to prepare your soul to receive or to care for the Holy Spirit. This is how you are in a house with a newborn baby sleeping, in silence so as not to wake him up. In fact, the ideal is to be aware of the place where our spirit, our soul, resides, which I place in the chest (that is where I feel the Holy Spirit when He is there).  But just keeping Him present or located (if the Holy Spirit is not there, your soul will be, and that will also serve), is a light way to introspect yourself in silence. The Holy Spirit will know of your efforts, of how you want to care for Him so that He grows in you, of how you miss Him, ultimately of how you love Him, and soon you will feel if He takes pity on you. And when you feel it, you will still look in silence, but you will feel accompanied, as if the Holy Spirit were looking through your eyes too, and from time to time you will utter a ‘Thank you, my God’ when you see the images of the world in which God has placed us. By the way, the silence must be total. You must avoid saying things like, ‘Silence’; it is also not good to go where there are many signs because you will unintentionally read them and break the silence.
So, I will continue with my crazy experience. After a few days of inner silence, I could feel the Holy Spirit in my chest. I remembered other times when I felt it a little lower down, but now I feel it in the upper part of my chest (yes, you can say it: it's completely crazy). Now I am always aware of it, and when I pray to God and set my thoughts beyond the sky, and beyond the end of the universe, to where I believe the Father is, I feel the Holy Spirit within me praying with me. It is not that the Spirit suggests what to ask for, as Scripture says, but that it prays with me. It is as if that part of the Holy Spirit within you that merges with you wants to stay with you because it loves you and prays with you so as not to have to leave you. I have always said that the relationship with the Spirit is more intuitive, and I believe this when we talk about the Holy Spirit in general, but if you specify or locate that Spirit united with you, you will feel it much closer, like a brother who becomes One with you, that is, who lowers Himself to you, and when you pray together with Him, you pray upwards. I know that He is still God, but it is as if He were your ally, a close friend who asks God that this union does not disappear and that He does not have to abandon you (I already said that the Holy Spirit is a person because of His own characteristics: when you sin, He abandons you, but that is how I have felt it). Within the enormous Unity of the Holy Spirit, it is as if that part that dwells within you reveals its own particular personality when it merges with you, for it does so in such a close, palpable way that it is difficult to conceive that It is God the Holy Spirit, Enormous, Eternal, One. When I pray, I always visualise my mind in my head talking or praying to God. In fact, I often turn my forehead towards the sky to address Him. Now when I pray, more crazy thoughts of mine, I visualise myself as before, but I also feel that prayer rising from my chest at the same time. Now I can feel accompanied and strangely alive when I walk in silence, or rather, in ‘silences,’ down the street or through the park. Now it is easier not to sin, to keep that company with you, that ally who loves you and whom you want to embrace even though He is within you.
So, I can tell you that this is the longest I have ever felt the Holy Spirit, even though I have not previously done spiritual exercises. It is true that I go to Mass and receive Communion almost daily, but I did that before and I did not feel this way. I also tell you that other times I have felt it much more intensely, but it did not last long because of my noise and my sins. Now it is there, which is a joy, and whether it grows or not, I do not consider it; just feeling it makes you feel alive, with butterflies in your stomach, it makes you look back on your childhood, your youth, your happiness.
He said that the newborn also feeds, not just rests. Its food is love, not only the love you have for Him when you feel Him within yourself, but also the love you project towards others. It is true that with the Holy Spirit within you, it is easier to love, because He is already love and it is easier to unite yourself to that torrent of love (according to the intensity of the Holy Spirit) with your own. In addition, you will do everything possible so that He does not leave you, for which you will begin to volunteer to do tasks that you did not do before among those with whom you live, for example, and you will have an active attitude to stay on the right path, rather than a passive one with which it is easier to sin.
What I have also noticed is that adrenaline is incompatible with the Holy Spirit. Maybe it's just another crazy idea of mine, but I have noticed that it scares Him away, and not only when adrenaline makes your chest swell up because you've had a run-in with someone, but in any circumstance. I've wondered why; perhaps living with our backs turned on the world should form us into strong and unflinching personalities, perhaps living with the Holy Spirit should take away our fear of death completely, so there would be no room for that adrenaline (which would you prefer, fear or death?). I don't know, these are just my observations after all.
Well, this is my experience, but whether it works for you or not, it is highly recommended to maintain that inner silence because it will prevent sins of thought from filtering in, the advance guard that destroys our state of Grace. Furthermore, as it is not easy, but requires considerable effort (thinking of nothing, that is, not thinking in order to attune our interior to the Holy Spirit), it is counted as an intention to turn away from the world and draw closer to God (perhaps this is why, sooner or later, through perseverance, the Holy Spirit becomes present). And do you find it strange that silence is so good? Well, what do we do when we go to Mass or to see the Blessed Sacrament? We go in silence. Since the Passion, our soul is once again the temple of God. This is what St Augustine said: God is within us, or something like that. Of course, as a saint, he must have felt the Holy Spirit very intensely, so it would have been easy for him to deduce this.

A Note on the Gospel I heard the other day at Mass:

Mark 2:21-22 No one sews a patch of unshrunk cloth on an old garment, for the patch will pull away from the garment, making the tear worse. (22) Nor does anyone pour new wine into old wineskins, for the wine will burst the skins, and both the wine and the skins will be ruined. Instead, new wine is poured into new wineskins.

Jesus says this without much context, although in reality He is referring to the moment of the Passion just before: Mark 2:20 Days will come when the bridegroom will be taken away from them, and then they will fast on that day.
What do you think Christ was talking about in this Word? Our soul and the Holy Spirit. Our old soul was broken in heaven and could no longer contain the Holy Spirit (the Wine spills out). He repairs it as something new, added to our body. Those new wineskins (our renewed souls) are what Jesus validates (or will validate here) by justifying Human Nature at that moment of passion, and in these new wineskins that new Holy Spirit can be preserved (we call the Holy Spirit we lost old, not that it is different). Some might say that Jesus is talking about the quality or strength of the Holy Spirit when that Spirit has been within us for a longer time, but that is not true, because He does not say that the old Wine is better, but rather that the new Wine must be in new wineskins. Everything has a meaning; nothing is written at random.
I add this clarification because it is true that I take many things for granted. I remind you that the Holy Spirit is represented in the Bible on many occasions by Bread, Oil, Wine, Gold, and Clothing. Thus, at the beginning, the mention of the old Garment refers, more generally, not as detailed as with the Wine and the wineskin, to that Holy Spirit who left us after the betrayal. I say it is a general reference because the Holy Spirit is not broken; it was us. The result was that the Spirit could no longer dwell within us. Could God have forgiven us, at least those who betrayed for the love of their Eve? Well, if the demons who wanted the same fate as Adam had not called on Him to be “just”, yes, He could have forgiven us. But since God cannot even appear to be unjust, in the end, this was not the case. Jesus had to make everything new, validating that new human nature, just as in heaven He validated the heavenly nature in the beginning. Thus, no one belonging to that heavenly nature (including demons, formerly angels) could claim anything over the independent and new human nature. If He had been able to forgive us, He would have put a ‘band-aid’ on us, as Scripture says, but everything was made new so as not to depend on the claims of the devil. This avoids ‘tensions’ caused by the demands of the demons, as well as any other complaints from those who remained in heaven; it even avoids ‘tensions’ with ourselves. A clean slate.
Surely there are many more places in the Bible that tell us about what happened in heaven than I have named in the essay.

12 Octubre 2025 The Samaritan, the Levite, and the Priest. (Corrected 14 October).

Luke 10:30-37 Jesus replied, "A man was going down from Jerusalem to Jericho, and he fell into the hands of robbers, who stripped him, beat him, and left him half dead.  (31)  By chance a priest was going down that road, and when he saw him, he passed by on the other side.  (32)  Likewise a Levite, when he came to the place and saw him, passed by on the other side.  (33) But a Samaritan traveller who came upon him was moved with compassion when he saw him. (34) He went to him, bandaged his wounds, pouring oil and wine on them, and put him on his own animal, brought him to an inn, and took care of him.  (35) The next day, when he was leaving, he took out two denarii, gave them to the innkeeper, and said, 'Take care of him, and whatever more you spend, I will repay you when I return. (36) Which of these three do you think was a neighbour to the man who fell into the hands of robbers?  (37) He said, “The one who showed mercy on him.” Then Jesus said to him, 'Go and do likewise.'

A couple of weeks ago, I heard this famous reading at Mass. And beyond the obvious, there is something else it wants to tell us. The not-so-obvious lesson is that we must not cast aside the fools of this world, the non-believers. Notice several things (first of all, remember that the Garments, Oil, Wine, Bread, and Gold often represent the Holy Spirit in the Bible):
∎ Those who come down and find the wounded man are a priest and a Levite, both close to God's law and to God, one supposes; when they could just as easily have been a blacksmith and a soldier, for example. 
∎ The man is stripped of his clothes, which in Scripture often refer to the Holy Spirit, of whom he is deprived; that is, this man could be anyone in our world who is tempted by the robbers of this world (the demons) and finds himself half dead (without inner life, only with the life of the body).
∎ The Samaritan, who is little more than an enemy of the Jews, approaches and heals his wounds with wine and oil, which also represent the Holy Spirit, and also bandages him, which in a way also covers the wound with garments (which also represent the Holy Spirit). I do not know of any remedy that consists of pouring oil on a wound; rather, it seems that this would make it worse. Nor do I believe that the alcohol in wine, which is about 14%, is capable of disinfecting a wound. Rather, it seems that these have been put there to designate the Holy Spirit.
∎ Note that the wounded man was going down the road, the priest was also going down, and the Levite says that he did the same as the priest, that is, he went down. We do not know about the Samaritan, but it says that he was ‘going’ along the road, and since it does not say ‘also,’ we can assume that he was going up. As you know, going down symbolises precisely that, moving away from heaven.

Thus, this reading seems to speak to us above all about that Holy Spirit lost by our brothers and our response to that problem. Moreover, the fact that it is a Samaritan who acts, or an enemy of the Jews, it seems, tells us that he is outside the established norms, as well as speaking to us about the hypocrisy of the priest and the Levite. 
And as always, we must identify with a character from Scripture on a personal level, and those who are clear that they have a mission from God must also identify with that character on the level of their mission.
∎ Looking at it from a personal perspective, and from this point of view of the Spirit, I identify with the Levite or the priest, because I often see fools around me who ignore God and even take me for a fool for following Him, and I think: well, you'll open your eyes, surely when it's too late. In fact, I have always thought that warning someone who is doing wrong, telling them what they are doing wrong, because if you do not bear their sin, refers to the ignorant. That is, we must warn the ignorant, those who do not know what they are doing wrong, but what is the point of warning someone who already knows they are doing wrong? It serves no purpose, except to make you appear accusatory in their eyes and cause them to become angry with you, which in turn will cause you to lose your inner peace. You may be able to stop them from doing it in front of you, if you have any authority, but the wrong attitude will persist. However, in the other case, that of the ignorant person, you are teaching the one who is doing wrong. Let us bear in mind that when this was written, people's religions and the rules to be followed in each nation were not widespread. But yes, I would be like that priest or Levite here, because I know that there are deaf people in this world who, in all fairness, cannot hear God. However, I do try to make sure that all of them can hear once and for all, and all at the same time. This is what sets me apart from you pastors, or priests, or Levites, or whatever you want to call yourselves, because you ignore all those who despise you and only have eyes for your dwindling flocks, who treat you with respect, admiration, and almost obeisance. You are not very different from the Pharisees of old. And yes, it is true that sometimes you cannot reason with a zombie, but you are withholding the vaccine that can rid the world of zombies. And it is not just omission, for this is now your true mission. Your sin is grave, and the higher your hierarchy, the worse it is.

∎ Looking at it from the perspective of the mission, I see myself as the Samaritan who tries to save the deaf or foolish people of this world, and I see you as the priests and Levites, you the shepherds. For just as the Samaritan is opposed to or an enemy of the Jews, what I say does not coincide with what you say (although it does in essence). Thus, just as Christ taught the Pharisees, Levites, priests, and other Jews with these stories, where God's mercy is, where God is, so I (saving infinite distances) have taught you where God's will is. What He left written for our time, written, and not revealed, for thousands of years, from the scriptures of the Jews (who do not believe in Jesus Christ), confirming Jesus Christ himself, our brother in creation. Confirming our history of betrayal and salvation in those three and a half times. Confirming that we are different from heaven in those seven Spirits of God, which in turn confirm the seven parallel paths or religions in the right direction.
I have shown you too much evidence: the 10 times those 3.5 times appear throughout the Bible (many more if we count them separately, in 10 ‘books’ if we count the prophets, the Psalms, the Gospel and the Apocalypse), Jacob's Ladder showing our fall from heaven and our ascent in the salvation of Jesus Christ. I have deciphered keys to the Bible (777-111=666), interpretations that give meaning to words that were jarring without interpretation, and so many other exegeses, such as that of the orphaned Psalms. I have explained to you in particular the hidden meaning of certain words (vocabulary) which, when their meaning is revealed in the Bible, insist on conveying the same message even when the prophets who use them are talking about different things. I have explained the inexplicable; not I, but the Bible. Now everything makes sense, everything fits together perfectly without the need to swallow incomprehensible statements in the name of faith. Because, in fact, faith is no longer necessary to believe in God, since everything is perfectly understandable from the world's perspective as well. Now we understand a God who cannot deny Himself, and therefore always acts within Justice. He is not a vengeful God, nor a God who hates us and therefore makes us suffer in the world. It is we who have fallen from heaven because of our betrayal, and He tries to save us, dodging the accusations that brand as unjust any benefit that God may give to us and not to them.

No one who has any knowledge of the Holy Scriptures can say that this is false. However, you priests and Levites, or rather Pharisees, do nothing because you prefer to serve the structure. You keep your bellies warm with a good bowl of hot soup that you think is provided by your hierarchical structure and not by God. For that is your choice, to turn your back on God and trust in men. You prefer appearances and the praise of your dwindling flock to feeling God within you. You prefer the respect of men and your accomplices in the hierarchy to serving God. If, in the time of Jesus Christ, the apostles and other Christians had been like you, more concerned with the establishment, with eating and day-to-day life than with God, He would have given up on everything and destroyed the world.
And Muslim pastors are the same or worse, because they do not dare to raise their voices or say anything that seems slightly different, lest they be taken for an ‘infidel’ and then be punished as in the time of the Prophet Muhammad (times of war, of conquest of pre-Islamic peoples) when Muslim infidels who did not repent of their infidelity were punished. Well, I, being a Christian (which many of you interpret as an enemy, just as the Samaritan seems to be an enemy of the Jews), have brought you confirmation of your faith. Because all this revelation, which confirms God, also confirms your faith. But you, like the others (Christian pastors), prefer to remain cosy and problem-free (lest someone label you an infidel), rather than make public what, as I say, confirms God and your faith. In other words, you don't care that so many young (and not so young) deaf people in the Muslim nation will go to hell before all this is made known. You who are not deaf, but who can hear, are like that Priest or that Levite, for you ignore that deaf man who is bleeding to death beside you, half dead. Like the others, you prefer the familiar, your warm belly, rather than feeling Allah within you. It seems that this is an evil that spreads to all the pastors of the religions to which this has come.
I won't even mention the Jews, because from what I've observed (although it could be others and not them, in the end these are only suspicions), they try to sabotage this website with malicious searches to cause errors in Google and make it drop in the search engine results (as this website does not have any files or collect data, there is little else they can do). Well, in the end, this isn't up to me, it's up to the Lord, and He will provide what is necessary.
It is a pity, because that courage that led you as young people to give your lives to God, with age and the comfort of high rank, or simply your stability at the helm of that Church or that Mosque, has been reduced to a routine and meagre thread of Life. Today, with that remedy in your pocket, you choose to turn away from the wounded, the half-dead, just as this Levite and this priest do. Perhaps, after all, the Lord left this hidden meaning written down to show you exactly what you are doing, turning your backs on all those you could heal using the knowledge of the Bible written for the deaf, for those who need proof of this world. Well, take a good look at how they are heading downwards. If this were the case, the Lord would be right, as always. Because He is right when He reveals the past from the future and when He writes from the past what will happen in the future. And bear in mind that it is not me who wants to scare you; when I wrote the commentary on 30 May 2025, I took pity and said about Bergoglio that ‘we do not know if he would spend 1, 10, 100 or 1000 years in purgatory for his sin of omission’; however, in the reading that came up later (randomly), this number curiously appeared without the 1 in front. Nor is the double meaning of this reading my doing, for as you know, the Holy Spirit is represented by these words (vocabulary) that I mentioned to you a long time ago, in accordance with everything written in the essay.

[14 October]

Well, as always, after thinking it over, something else always comes up. In 34-35 it says:

35 ... and putting him on his own mount, he took him to an inn and looked after him. (35) And the next day, when he left, he took out two denarii, gave them to the innkeeper, and said to him, 'Look after him, and whatever you spend beyond that, I will repay you when I return.

Here, it seems that the Samaritan ultimately represents Jesus Christ, and even his passion. It says that he carried him on his own mount (he carried him) and then took him to the innkeeper (a place where one feeds), in this case the Church, the Mosque, or whatever is appropriate, at that time leaving us with the apostles. And when he left, when he departed (in the Passion, in reality), he ‘took out’ two denarii... (they appear when he leaves; he could have said ‘he gave him two denarii’ directly, more appropriate in a story as short as this one). These refer to the Holy Spirit again (gold, silver, coins). They may even refer to the Holy Trinity, one coin is the Holy Spirit, another is Jesus, who after the Passion we will know is our brother (in creation), capable of maintaining that Holy Spirit at its maximum intensity, that of God. And when he says ‘when I return,’ he is referring to just that, the second coming of Jesus Christ, or the end of the world for non-Christians. Then he goes on to say: (when I return) I will give you what is lacking (indefinite, infinite in theory). That which is lacking is God the Father, infinite, whom we cannot see or contain, although we can contain the Holy Spirit, for He is God in some intensity. None of us could contain God, who is infinite, and yet many of us know that we do contain God (although not at all times) in some intensity. Many people contain Him, even though there is only one God.
Well, but this does not exempt you priests and pastors, because it is telling you what Jesus Christ would do (and did) to those who did not have the capacity or possibility to receive the Holy Spirit. For if it were a complete representation of salvation for all humanity, among the wounded there would also be the Levites and priests themselves. It seems that it is put this way so that today you may see yourselves reflected in this Word, because in the end it does speak of the salvation of all humanity (the two coins and what is missing). It is relevant to what is happening today with pastors who prefer to hide the evidence of God's existence, revealed here, and not heal the wounded, in order to maintain their unshakeable traditions. The price? All those fools who could be saved. But it doesn't matter as long as you are warm and respected by your flock, by your dwindling flock.

I added a note. I have used this Word from the Textual Bible, which is the most literal; although others, such as the CEE, also mention that they stripped the wounded man naked, others say ‘robbed’ instead of ‘stripped naked’, perhaps because it seems strange that they would strip someone they were robbing. Why would they take off his underwear, if he had any? However, the Word uses that term because it refers to the fact that they took away the Holy Spirit (Garments). And yes, it is not only demons that cause us to sin and lose the Holy Spirit in this world, but we all lost it in heaven, some by following them and others by the blackmail demanded by the same fate as Adam (if you do not know what I am talking about, read something from the essay).

[---]
∎ Whenever I talk about shepherds, I share this reading with you, which once came up (after praying and randomly opening the bible) when I was discussing a topic about you.

Jeremiah 25:15-38
15 For Yahweh, the God of Israel, said this to me, 'Take this cup of the wine of wrath and make all the nations to whom I send you drink it;
16 they will drink and reel and lose their wits, because of the sword I am sending among them.'
17 I took the cup from Yahweh's hand and made all the nations to whom Yahweh sent me drink it
18 (Jerusalem and the towns of Judah, its kings and its chief men, to make them a ruin, an object of horror and derision and a curse, as is the case today):
19 Pharaoh king of Egypt, his officials, his chief men and all his people,
20 with the whole conglomeration of peoples there (all the kings of the country of Uz); all the kings of the country of the Philistines, Ashkelon, Gaza, Ekron and what is still left of Ashdod;
21 Edom, Moab and the Ammonites;
22 (all) the kings of Tyre, (all) the kings of Sidon, the kings of the island across the sea;
23 Dedan, Tema, Buz, all the people with shaven temples;
24 all the kings of Arabia (and all the kings of the conglomeration of peoples) who live in the desert
25 (all the kings of Zimri), all the kings of Elam, and all the kings of Media;
26 all the kings of the north, near and far, one after another: in short, all the kingdoms on the face of the earth. (As for the king of Sheshak, he will drink last of all.)
27 'You will say to them, "Yahweh Sabaoth, the God of Israel, says this: Drink! Get drunk! Vomit! Fall, never to rise again, before the sword that I am sending among you!"
28 If they refuse to take the cup from your hand and drink, you will say to them, "Yahweh Sabaoth says this: You must drink!
29 Look, for a start, I am bringing disaster on the city that bears my name, so are you likely to go unpunished? You certainly will not go unpunished, for next I shall summon a sword against all the inhabitants of the land, Yahweh declares." 30 'For your part, you are to prophesy all these words to them. Say to them: "Yahweh roars from on high, he thunders from his holy dwelling-place, loudly he roars at his own fold, shouts aloud like those who tread the grape at all the inhabitants of the land.
31 The noise resounds to the remotest parts of the earth. For Yahweh is indicting the nations, arraigning all humanity for judgement; the wicked he assigns to the sword, Yahweh declares.
32 Yahweh Sabaoth says this: Look, disaster is spreading from nation to nation, a mighty tempest is rising from the far ends of the earth.
33 "Those slaughtered by Yahweh that day will be scattered across the world from end to end. No dirge will be raised for them; no one will gather them or bury them; they will stay lying on the surface like dung.
34 "Howl, shepherds, shriek, roll on the ground, you lords of the flock, for your days have come to be slaughtered and to be scattered, and like a choice vase you will fall.
35 No refuge then for the shepherds, no escape for the lords of the flock!
36 Listen! A shriek from the shepherds, a howl from the lords of the flock! For Yahweh has laid their pasture waste, 37 the peaceful sheepfolds are reduced to silence owing to Yahweh's furious anger.
38 The lion has left his lair and their country is a wasteland now, owing to the devastating fury, owing to his furious anger." '

19 October 2025 About the importance of the Holy Scriptures

2 Timothy 3:14–4:2
Dear brother, remain steadfast in what you have learned and been entrusted with, for you know well from whom you learned it, and from childhood you have been familiar with the Holy Scriptures, which can give you the wisdom that, through faith in Christ Jesus, leads to salvation.
All Holy Scripture is inspired by God and useful for teaching, for reproof, for correction, and for training in righteousness, so that the man of God may be complete, equipped for every good work.
In the presence of God and of Christ Jesus, who is to come to judge the living and the dead, I urge you, by his coming and by his Kingdom, to proclaim the word; be persistent whether the time is favourable or unfavourable; convince, rebuke and exhort with all patience and wisdom.

I was going to leave today's reading alone, as it seems quite clear to me, but just in case you only take away the part about ‘remaining steadfast in what you have learned,’ I will tell you that it then argues that this is because you know the Holy Scriptures. Everything revealed on this website (in the essay) is written in the Holy Scriptures, and the exegesis of the Scriptures is nothing more than explanations of them. Well, pastors who have already read the essay, or part of it, are no longer ignorant, so to say that you are sinning by not spreading the knowledge of God is simply to accuse you. If you were ignorant, as I said in the previous comment, I would be teaching you. And you are sinning not only by seriously neglecting your main mission, which is to spread the knowledge of God, but also because you are portraying God as a Being who is deeply unjust to us (i.e. cruel, arbitrary, childish, sadistic, etc.) by claiming that we were expelled from Eden because of the sin of one person. It was our personal sin, and contrary to what you say, God tries to save us for having emptied ourselves of Him, but without breaking with justice, for the reasons I have already explained 100 times. I am sorry to say that despite the last comment I made a few days ago, I do not care if you see me as an accuser, and this reading encourages me to continue.

Beyond this comment, I am going to tell you something related to this lax stance of the Church, which I see as posturing, appearances, superficiality... towards the silly things of the world in general and of society in particular, and on the other hand, passivity, immobility, petrification in important matters that may disturb the comfortable lives of pastors (the latter also applies to Muslim pastors, but not the former. I am not talking about other parallel paths in the right direction - mercy - because I am even more ignorant about these).
Today (Saturday afternoon, yesterday according to the publication date) I went to the Jesuit mass again (the Sacred Heart of Jesus in Malaga) and they used inclusive language again, but this time changing a reading from the Gospel, no less:

Luke 18:1-8 [I am only including an excerpt] ... For a long time, the judge ignored her, but then he said to himself, “Even though I do not fear God or respect men [OR WOMEN], nevertheless, because of this widow's persistence, I will grant her justice so that she will stop bothering me”."

I have wondered what the Jews would think about so blithely changing a Holy Scripture. When Jews read the Torah, they have someone standing next to them pointing out the words; someone who knows the reading in question by heart, and if the reader makes a mistake in an insignificant vowel, they stop him and correct him. And that's for making a mistake; imagine adding to it as you please.

And this is what is happening today: the Church, in order to keep up appearances, is making changes to the Holy Scriptures. It is true that they could argue: but we haven't changed anything, because “men” includes “men and women”! Okay, so why did you change it? Because they are malleable to criticism from the “progressive” part of society (not even from society as a whole), in order to align themselves with them. Following this line of thinking, we could change the term “slaves”, which is anachronistic and totally scandalous for this society (the Gospel says something like “slaves should serve their masters well”), to “fraudulently hired domestic workers”; perhaps that wouldn't change much either. Not to mention the readings that talk about women serving men, etc. Don't touch it, kid...! Leave the Scriptures as they are; they can be interpreted, but not changed for nonsense.
It is true that this occurs in one branch of the Church (as far as I know): the Jesuits. Perhaps it is a weak branch; the more malleable a branch is, the weaker it is, and even if it does not break, it usually ends up a little bent. In short, it seems that the Church is capable of bending itself to change the Holy Scriptures to suit the worldly tastes of society, but it is not capable of changing itself in the light of the Holy Scriptures. What is the difference? In the first case, people will say, ‘Oh, how modern!’ In the other case, it will affect your comfortable complacency. Vanity of vanities, said Ecclesiastes.
The fact that a branch of the Church can change the Holy Scriptures tells me that the responsibility for the grave sin that the Church hierarchy is committing by keeping what has been revealed here (of which it is already aware) hidden extends to ranks much lower than those in the Vatican. This is assuming that the Vatican has not given orders to use this inclusive language, even to the point of changing the Holy Scriptures. If that were the case, we would have to remain silent because they are in charge. It would be a superficial order very typical of the Vatican lately, and although I would consider it a mistake, we would have to obey it without question (especially because it is superficial nonsense).
If the Vatican had not given orders, it would be like saying that anyone can change the Scriptures as they please, and following this line of thinking, a priest who believes that one only has to be good to others (like those German bishops) could also be inclusive to the point of saying: ‘The soldier whipped Jesus, they did it with his whip (I'm sorry, I don't know how to use non-sexist inclusive language in English)’. In the end, what does it matter? You just have to be good to others; you have to be a happy flower.

7 November 2025. In summary. [Point about the Spirit added 9 Nov and 10 Nov 25]

I have been trying to justify your thinking; that idea that because of the sin of one, all were condemned. If we thought of a man who did that, we would label him cruel, sadistic, unjust... because that is what we thought of the Nazis (National Socialists) who shot 10 people for the murder of one of their soldiers. So imagine expelling all of humanity from Eden to a cursed world of death and pain because of the sin of one person. The only way I can think of to avoid calling God unjust, cruel and even sadistic, according to your thinking, is that this person (the free personality of an individual) destroyed or altered the entire nature of humanity. Understanding this nature as the model container or structure that contains each person.
But even so, I find it impossible to understand you because it is clear that if someone crashes a boat and destroys it (the container structure), it is the fault of that particular navigator. Not all boats manufactured of the same model will be affected, especially knowing that they were designed by a perfect manufacturer.

Jesus the Only One, Seal of Approval, Prototype.
However, the opposite is true: only a prototype tested under the most extreme conditions can validate or establish the suitability of that model of boat for carrying people.
Thus, this One through whom everything was made is Jesus Christ. He was tested in love in Heaven, as the firstborn, and because He was able to maintain the Holy Spirit at maximum intensity, He pleased God the Father, who created the rest of the heavenly powers. He, that One, Christ, validated the created heavenly structure or nature, as the first and only created prototype, because Christ has a created nature like ours and a Divine nature, since He maintains the Holy Spirit at maximum intensity, that of God the Father. The angels (and ultimately we too, although to a lesser extent) who are made in the image and likeness of the validated prototype (and this in turn of God the Father), also have their own person and contain the Holy Spirit in some intensity, that is, they also participate in that Divine nature, although not to the extent of God the Father and Jesus. And indeed, we (even more so the angels) are made in the image and likeness of God, and what do you think this means? That we are made in the image and likeness of the Holy Trinity? No. That would be to say that each of us is an inextricable mystery and that we are more or less God, our being going beyond our own understanding; when this is not the case, we more or less understand ourselves. No. God the Father and the Holy Spirit predate Jesus, even though He is also a person of God. Why? Because the Holy Spirit, the Essence of God the Father, is what confers Divinity. Let us say that just as there is a heavenly structure or nature that sustains the person of angels, and another human nature that contains the person of men, the person of God the Father is sustained in the Holy Spirit. Given that the Holy Spirit in God the Father and in Jesus Christ (despite being created by the Father) is at its maximum intensity and merges with the persons in whom it dwells, they are, together with the Holy Spirit, the three persons of God. That is to say, even though they are prior, without beginning, eternal, the Father and the Holy Spirit, and Jesus Christ the subsequent creation of the Father, the three become one in the Divine nature, in the Holy Spirit. We, who have been made in the image of God the Father, a person capable of maintaining the Holy Spirit, are participants in that Divine Nature (thanks to the first created, Jesus, who first validated the heavenly nature and then the human nature), when, in effect, we contain that Holy Spirit, that Essence of God the Father (which, since the creation of the person of the Son, also flows through him in maximum intensity).
Thus, both Jesus Christ and the angels, and subsequently we ourselves, are made in the image and likeness of God the Father, the container (and “fusion”) of the Holy Spirit. It would be like saying that we are made in the image and likeness of God before all else, of ‘Binary’ God. Because that is how we are: we have our soul, which manifests itself as our person, and the Holy Spirit, which is what gives us Life when it dwells within us (2 parts; I do not mention the body because it is only the vehicle or ship with which we move, and it seems more like a burden added to the soul and the Holy Spirit; perhaps these, without a body, are the form of angels - without limbs, free to fly wherever they want). In reality, we are quite simple, although the mystery that resides in the Holy Trinity (3 persons, one God) also resides in us, because our person can also contain God (although not with the same intensity). Of course, Jesus Christ has been a fundamental part of our creation, for He validated the created heavenly nature, and then the created human nature. And indeed, Jesus Christ is a Person of God because of what was said above, because He maintains the Holy Spirit in the highest intensity. To say that man (or angels too) can maintain God is to confirm all that has been said. To say that many can contain God and that there is only one God is also to confirm all that has been said.

The Rebellion in Heaven
Well, now imagine that in that heaven there was one who wanted more of God's Essence, that wonderful Essence that gives you Life, but he could not take any more because his soul was made of a specific size. So he started a rebellion, convincing a few others, who together with the first one will be called demons or fallen angels. And tell me, although we can say that iniquity entered through one, is it not true that this one convinced others? That is, the others, for whatever reasons, chose to take that path. This is not the same as saying that because of Adam's sin, humanity was expelled from Eden; that would be profoundly unjust.
But what happened in this rebellion? Not only were there these two groups: the rabid rebel demons and the faithful angels. There was another group that also coveted the Essence of the Holy Spirit and supported the demons, but without rabidly hating God and the established order; these are described as “Eve” in that metaphor from Genesis where the devil is depicted as a serpent. And they find it appealing to take from that Holy Spirit, to become even like God the Father or the Son. And who are the Adams in this childish metaphor? They are those who did not covet but supported the demons out of love for the Evas.
Well, really, in all rebellions you can distinguish between: the established order, the rebel activists, the greedy opportunists, and those who get involved in the struggle to defend those they love, even if they don't get involved in politics. It's not that hard to imagine.

Defeat and Extortion
Now imagine that the rebellion is defeated and we find ourselves broken, like cracked cisterns, unable to contain the Holy Spirit, and that God intends to save from among the traitors at least those who supported the rebellion out of love for those who participated in it, not out of hatred for God or greed. But, knowing that God is not only magnanimous but also perfectly just (to the point that if He committed an injustice it would be like denying Himself, like ceasing to be God as He is), the devil tells Him that he wants the same fate as those who supported the rebellion out of love, because in the end they are also traitors (he says). At that moment, God could have eliminated everyone, the demons, the greedy angels, and those who betrayed out of love, and that would have been the end of it, but He did not do so, because God loves us, and for Him the intention that led us to rebel (love in our case, in the case of Adam, here below those inscribed in the book of Life) is very important. Even for human justice, the intention behind a crime is decisive. But God cannot even appear to be unjust, which is why He accepted the devil's claims.

Our Justification
How could God avoid this demand from the devil without committing injustice, without denying Himself? By making everything new for us, separating us from our broken nature and, like a potter, creating another nature to contain us in place of the one we broke (each one personally), for which He would have to return to the beginning where He made the heavenly nature new. Since Christ was the validating beginning of all angels, including the devil (fallen angel), it had to be Christ who validated a new nature so that it could exist separately from the previous one; separate but parallel. In this way, no one belonging to the old heavenly nature validated by Christ could say that our ‘recreation’ was unjust, for to do so would be to say that their own creation was also unjust. This is why it had to be the same validating principle that validated the new nature. It is the reason why Christ became man and, as such, was tested in love to infinity on the cross, for it takes a great deal of love to forgive those who are torturing and mocking you; even more so when you have come down to help them and this is how they repay you, even more so when the martyrdom is so prolonged, for it was not only the cross, it was the scourging, the crowning with thorns, the climb to Golgotha...
It is after all that, on the cross, when He lovingly forgives us and the devil's claim disappears, because Christ, loving to the extreme, has validated the new nature of man, exclusively as man, with the Holy Spirit set apart (they took away his perfect garments, “My God, why have you forsaken me?”). A new nature for those traitorous angels, us. And the devil can say nothing, because those traitorous angels have not returned to what they were, they no longer have a heavenly nature; that is our punishment, the same as that of the demons (this is justice). The difference is that God gives us a new nature because He gives it to whomever He wants once the other matter has been settled, but He cannot cheat; the new nature must be validated like the first, the heavenly one, because in this way it is independent of it, separated from any claim. And so we have been separated from the fate of the demons. And God has not committed any injustice because He, as I say, can give that new independent nature to whomever He wants. Had we remained in the primary thread, in that created heavenly nature, the demon could always have asked for our same fate. But he cannot declare the creation of a new nature to be unjust, for that would be to declare his own creation to be unjust, which was also once a new creation validated and justified by the same validator: Jesus.
In passion, or validation of human nature, the devil loses his shield, and the chains that bound us to Pharaoh are broken. For it is from that moment on that man can receive the Holy Spirit.

Man, Demons, and the World
Man without the Holy Spirit is nothing; he is not truly alive. It is true that he has a soul, but it is empty. However, unlike demons, he can exercise freedom; he can choose to do good. He has a soul. This is what God gave us after the betrayal when we became men, although in justice, we could not be filled until this nature was validated in the Passion as a vessel fit to hold the Holy Spirit. Once demons lost their heavenly nature, they were deformed, their souls were broken (like ours after the betrayal and before becoming men), with no possibility of exercising freedom. God has made the world similar to heaven in many ways so that it may serve as proof to justify us. There are even visible things that seem to describe it for our understanding (the Sun seems to represent God, the East where it rises represents Life, the West where it sets represents death, the three states of water... I have written a point in the essay about this); and so for me, in viruses we can see those demons represented, because they have no body or soul like ours, and they desire not only to kill us, but to enter into us as a virus does with a cell to take control of it. That person who surrenders to the world (to any of its idols: sex, power, money...), who idolises it to the point of emptying themselves and filling themselves with it, or if you like, turning their soul inside out like a sock in order to connect even more with the idol they worship, can be possessed by a demon according to this image. When a person becomes an idolater, their soul, once created to contain the Holy Spirit, becomes blurred by their personal freedom. When I say that our person is a manifestation of our soul (although we may tend to locate our person in our head and our soul in our chest), I am also saying that our person directs and influences the ‘form’ of our soul. In fact, it is our person that decides to do good or evil, which will determine whether or not our soul can be filled with the Holy Spirit. That is why idolising the things of the world can blur or weaken the soul, as a result of trying to get closer to the world, to the worshipped idol (in thought, desire, intention, greed...). And even if this is not the intention of that person, it is the consequence and the reason why they become equal to, or defenceless against, the demons that can enter them (in reality, there is also justice in this, because if you blur the boundaries of your soul so much, you are becoming like that demon who has a broken soul and you are giving it free rein). It is important to know that behind every idol (sex, money, power, affection...) there are many demons, for they use idols to tempt men. This is because the world has been set up as a test for men, and the prince of the world is the devil. Although it is not always for an idol. There are those who train their will to erase the boundaries of their person and become one with the world. This occurs with some practices such as Yoga, which seeks to unite ‘the body, mind and spirit’. The problem is that our body, our vehicle, is always connected to the world, and it is very easy to confuse it with the rest of the world when trying to “unite” it with the mind and spirit; it is easy to get it wrong and lower your defences, opening yourself up to the world and its demons. The latter remind me of the idiot in horror films (in the past, they always cast an incompetent woman) who accidentally short-circuits the defences of their house, allowing monsters to enter. The sad thing is that this isn't a film. Be careful, because they are always lurking, and although it's not very common, there are seemingly normal people with a demon inside them.
And why has God left demons among us? It is also part of justice. The reason is that the devil claims that despite our new nature, in the same circumstances (with him tempting us at our side), we would choose him and not God. It is not enough to receive the new nature validated as human beings; we must prove that we deserve it, otherwise it would be the same as giving a demon human nature, since in the end, as human beings, we would have chosen the demon or his idols and not God.
In this context of justice, it is important to remember that those who fell because of greed (the Eves) were also granted human nature, just like the Adams. The difference is that the Eves, or the greedy, will only have ears for the idols of the world and its demons, just as happened in heaven; for it was they who were deceived by the demons and then convinced the Adams to fall for love of them. Thus, as justice in the world, the Evas can only approach God through the experience or influence of the Adams, as happened in reverse in heaven; not by themselves, for they are deaf to God.

The Holy Spirit in all who are baptised? [Added 9-11-25]
I add this after listening to today's Mass, and I put it after the previous point, which is relevant.
The Holy Spirit can be lost. If you feel better when you are in God's grace, it is because the Spirit dwells in you (perhaps not to the fullest extent of which you are capable), but He is in you. The opposite happens when you feel empty. There are sins that suddenly empty you of the Holy Spirit, which is why they are called mortal (not only because they lead you to hell); they kill you here and now, inwardly. The Spirit cannot coexist with evil. It is impossible. As true as it is that injustice cannot coexist in God. Both are denying God, denying the Holy Spirit.

Mar 3:22-29 And the scribes who had come down from Jerusalem said, “He has Beelzebub!” and “By the prince of demons he casts out demons!”  (23)  And calling them to him, he said to them in parables, 'How can Satan cast out Satan?  (24)  If a kingdom is divided against itself, that kingdom cannot stand.  (25)  And if a house is divided against itself, that house cannot stand.  (26)  And if Satan rises up against himself and is divided, he cannot stand, but has an end.  (27)  But no one can enter the strong man's house and plunder his goods, unless he first binds the strong man, then he can plunder his house.  Truly I tell you, all sins and blasphemies that the sons of men blaspheme will be forgiven them,  (29) but whoever blasphemes against the Holy Spirit will never be forgiven, but is guilty of an eternal sin.

Jesus makes this clear in this passage. After talking about the devil (why he does not have the devil inside him), he continues with a contradictory proposition beginning with ‘but’ (27 but no one can...). He says that if you have the Holy Spirit, the strong man, you cannot enter the house without first binding him. And after saying this, he adds that it is blasphemy to insinuate or claim that one has the devil inside when one has the Holy Spirit. And doesn't it work the other way around? Are there no baptised people who are possessed by demons? What happens if you claim that a possessed person, a murderer no less, has the Holy Spirit inside him? I tell you that you are equally blasphemous when you say that all baptised people have the Holy Spirit. If that were the case, this world would be a utopia, because we would all have the strong man inside guarding the door and we would already be almost in heaven; because with the Holy Spirit you are different, no shouting, no bad gestures, not even illness makes you grumpy. And yet we are surrounded by darkness, well, not so much, but you almost always see shady dealings and fights in your immediate environment, even worse if you read the news.
Do you not realise that it is precisely the incompatibility of the Holy Spirit with evil, with sin, that has brought us down here? That prevented the demons from being forgiven after their rebellion? What is this incompatibility that this Word speaks of?
As I said in the previous point, an idolater can blur the soul to such an extent that, without meaning to, they allow a demon to enter (fulfilling justice, since this person is similar to another who has no soul, but a broken one). In the same way, the Holy Spirit cannot dwell in a soul that is contaminated, either by sins or by a demon. The soul of the idolater, of the sinner, reaches a point where it is no longer habitable by the Holy Spirit and reaches another point even lower where it is habitable by demons. The Holy Spirit will try to live in us until it can no longer do so, similar to the life of the body which, even if we are wounded, remains in us until the body can no longer sustain it.

1Co 3:10-11.17 According to the grace of God given to me, as a skilled architect I laid a foundation, and someone else is building on it. But each one must be careful how he builds on it.  (11)  For no one can lay any foundation other than the one already laid, which is Jesus Christ.
(16) Do you not know that you are God's temple and that God's Spirit dwells in you? (17) If anyone destroys God's temple, God will destroy him, for God's temple is holy, and you are that temple.

Today's Mass reading confirms this (even though today's priest may think otherwise). It talks about St. Paul laying the foundations of the Temple, and then goes on to say that others, and even we ourselves, can build upon it with gold, blah, blah, blah (I haven't included these passages). But whoever destroys it will be destroyed by God. Obviously, he is saying that just as he builds, another or you yourself can destroy. He does not mean that someone is going to kill you (destroy the body and the temple), because that in itself has its punishment, on earth and afterwards; it would be irrelevant (besides, our temple, our soul, if it is filled with the Holy Spirit when the body dies, will never be destroyed thanks to Jesus, it will always live). In other words, the Holy Spirit can be lost in life, through your own actions or those of others (destroying the Temple), which is what actually leads us to hell (dying without the Holy Spirit, hence the Parables of the Talents, the Mina and so many others).
In John 2:13-22, however, the last mention of the Temple does refer to Jesus' body:

John 2:13-16 The Passover of the Jews was at hand, and Jesus went up to Jerusalem.  (14) And he found in the Temple those who sold oxen and sheep and doves, and the money changers seated there.  (15) And he made a whip of cords and drove them all out of the Temple, with the sheep and oxen, and poured out the money-changers' coins and overturned their tables. (16) And he said to those who sold the doves, ‘Take these things away; do not make my Father's house a house of trade!’ ... (19) Jesus answered and said unto them, Destroy this temple, and in three days I will raise it up.

But even here Jesus' words are clear: ‘Do not make my Father's house a house of trade.’ He could have said: Do not defile my Father's house, Do not obstruct the entrance to my Father's house, Do not trade in my Father's house... And so many others, yet in his expression there is a transformation of his Father's house into something else. Nothing is written by chance.
I suppose this thought is what leads you to say that only Christianity leads to heaven since no one else is baptised; you continue to call God unjust, cruel... and it turns out that you are also blasphemers (you already were, in fact, by claiming that God the Father is unjust, but now it seems that you are also blaspheming against the Holy Spirit). It seemed that you pastors were the best, but you are falling further and further. Of course, as time goes by and you do nothing, it gets worse. Anyway, I already wrote a fairly long section on the Holy Spirit in the essay, which may be interesting to read.

[Heh, heh, I won't add anything else to this comment, just this:]

At today's Mass, 10-11-25, a Word of Wisdom was spoken.

Wisdom 1:1-7 Love justice, you who govern the earth, think well of the Lord and seek him with simplicity of heart. He allows himself to be found by those who do not doubt him and reveals himself to those who trust in him. Perverse thoughts turn people away from God, and the foolish, who want to test divine power, are left looking ridiculous.
Wisdom does not enter an evil soul, nor dwell in a body subject to sin. The holy spirit, who educates us and flees from hypocrisy, distances himself from foolishness and is rejected by injustice. Wisdom is a spirit that is friendly to men, but it will not leave the blasphemer unpunished, for God knows the innermost depths of the soul, observes the heart closely, and hears everything the tongue says. The spirit of the Lord fills the whole earth, gives consistency to the universe, and knows everything that man says.

Wisdom here and throughout the book of Wisdom refers to the Holy Spirit. It is true that sometimes it seems to speak of worldly wisdom, but this is not the case. This idea is rather induced by the very name used, ‘Wisdom’. Thus, if you replace ‘Wisdom’ with ‘Holy Spirit,’ everything fits together much better. Or are there not wicked, foolish, or hypocritical wise men for the world? Whenever I have heard Words of Wisdom, I have attributed them to the Holy Spirit, but even if you think it refers to a metaphysical Wisdom or Knowledge of God, we would be in the same position. For except for a few theologians and priests who claim to know God, that ‘knowledge’ for the average Christian consists of loving God and believing in Him. To say that this love or “faith” flees from sinners is too similar to saying that the Holy Spirit cannot coexist with evil, since it is the “knowledge of God” (for me, the Holy Spirit) that flees, not the sinner who turns his back on God (which is also true). Thus, we know that God the Father is patient and waits for us even though we sin, but the Holy Spirit cannot coexist with evil because it merges with us, and it cannot be sullied or stained. It cannot cease to be what it is; it cannot deny itself. God the Father sends it back to us when we are clean. 

What Really Happened on the Cross
So, as the main act of that Justification of Human Nature, separate from the fate of the devil, there is the Passion, whose origin, motive, or unavoidable cause was the Justice demanded by the devil. It was not a meaningless compensation from God: since one disobeyed, my Son will have to undo that sin by obeying. What you defend makes no sense, and even if it did, it could only be justified by a lie and by the idea that Jesus, as I have stated, is a creation of the Father like us (the only reason I can think of why He would have to be punished for the fault of another: the older brother bears the guilt of the younger). But above all, it is based on a lie: that God expelled all of humanity from Eden because of the sin of one; and even if I had not revealed to you what really happened, you should know that it is a lie because it makes God unjust, cruel, and even sadistic. When you teach this, you teach that God is not God, but rather a god of legends or an evil genie.
And in the Passion and in everything God did to try to save us, the Holy Spirit is of primary importance, because He is the most important thing for us. He is the one who gives us Life (and I say this correctly, because the Father created you thanks to Jesus, but He gives you Life). And He is so important that He was taken away from Jesus on the cross so that He could prove His human nature, only as a man (a structure with an empty soul). For man with and without the Holy Spirit are totally different. With the Holy Spirit, you have God within you, which is why He had to be taken away from Jesus, because otherwise He would have cheated (committed injustice), He would have passed the test, the validation, with God's help.
Some fools say that Jesus doubted on the cross because of his words: ‘My God, why have you forsaken me?’ Not at all. He already knew what was going to happen to him. It was revealed to him in the Garden of Olives, where he sweated blood just thinking about it. But the pains he was going to suffer as a man were revealed to him; he did not know that the Holy Spirit was going to be taken away from him (they took away his perfect garments).
Everything makes perfect sense, it fits together seamlessly, and I did not invent it. Everything was hidden in the Bible to be revealed in our day.

Religions as the Fruit of God's Justice
Another thing you pastors say, which, although not as insulting as calling God unjust, cruel, sadistic... is what can be inferred from your statement: my religion is the only path that leads to God. Which is to insist on the same thing: you are calling Him unjust. Do you believe that the Lord would allow so many souls who do not belong to your religion to fall into hell just because they were not born in an area where your religion is practised? Because that is the reality, one has the religion of one's parents, and they likewise have the religion that is practised in their area. Do you believe that God has organised this whole setup, the world, the universe and all that, to see how millions of souls who do not belong to your religion are infested by His enemy, by our enemy, the devil? No. He is Just and must allow us the freedom to choose, even within our religion (or that of our nation), to turn away from Him and draw closer to the idols of the world, but in no way would He allow us not to have that choice, to be marked by an erroneous religion of our nation that would have instilled in us a path of perdition. Each of us was born in the right nation because each of us had a certain size of soul that we emptied, and now in the world we have to refill it with the Holy Spirit. We have been different since we were created in heaven, and like children of different ages (or sizes in our case) we need to be taught in different ways, although in the same direction: love and mercy. There are seven religions guided by mercy to which the Holy Spirit comes (or which lead to God, if you will), but it comes to them in different intensities. Hence, smaller soul sizes need less flow to fill up, just as it happens between a ship and a car. If you are going to fill a ship with a car petrol station hose, it may take you years to do so. This does not mean that some are superior to others. We were all enormously happy in heaven, and God loves us all, just as a father loves his youngest child as much as his eldest. The difference is that minors are more indulged. All this is reflected in the Bible as the seven Spirits of God, and these seven nations are often mentioned in a hidden way, with the enumeration of seven geographical features, seven churches, seven cities, and even seven weapons, designating the seven sizes of demons; for indeed, if we fell from seven sizes on earth, it is because there were also seven sizes of demons, since they all came from the same place: the traitorous angels who rose up. It would be useful to read the section A Little Numerology, as 7 does not always represent perfection.

The Holy Scriptures: Light, Guide, and Source
As I said at the beginning, it's not that I made up this whole tangled web. Of course, it would have taken a lot of skill to make everything fit together, and even if I had made it up, uncovering such obvious evidence as the fact that you deny God and insult Him every day when you say that He cast humanity into a world of pain because of the sin of one man would be a good reason for you to consider what you are doing wrong.
But that's not the case. There are many places in the Bible where it tells us that we already lived in heaven before we were born on earth, and that it was our personal sin that caused us to leave there, not the sin of someone other than ourselves (obviously). Let's start with:
Jacob's Ladder (or the 10 plagues combined with the events of the Exodus) which describe in a hidden way our fall from heaven and our ascent, with passion as the turning point.
The three and a half times also described in a hidden way 10 times in the Prophets, the Psalms, the Gospel and the Apocalypse. Those three and a half times are:
∎ The First Time. Our stay in Heaven with God, where we rebelled.
∎ The Second Time. In heaven, now empty of God after being defeated following the betrayal, where our future is decided.
∎ The Third Time. On Earth before Christ, where man cannot yet be filled with God, but his righteousness is counted for the moment when he can be filled (Jesus descends to Sheol for these just after the Passion or Validation).
∎ And the Last Half Time that begins in the Passion, when human nature is finally validated and is able to maintain God, the Holy Spirit.
I have not invented that the devil has used us to shield himself. All this can be deduced from the prophets when read in the hidden sense that they all share, the most important being that of those 3.5 times. Furthermore, in Psalms from Heaven (the orphaned Psalms), we see how in the second time they set traps for us with lies to lead us to their same destiny, ultimately to remove us from heaven.
It is impressive to see how so many Scriptures, written so many years apart, often by different peoples, coincide in this hidden message; and hidden even to them, making it impossible for them to have passed these secrets down from generation to generation, impossible for them to have agreed on them. Sometimes I feel like an archaeologist in search of hidden treasures, because everything has been written there for thousands of years and no one had seen it before.
I leave this topic with a brief comment from the second reading of today's Office of Readings (6-11-2025):

From the catechesis of Saint Cyril of Jerusalem, bishop
(Catechesis 5, On Faith and the Symbol, 12-13: PG 33, 513-523)
ON THE SYMBOL OF FAITH
When learning and professing the faith, adhere to and preserve only that which is now delivered to you by the
Church, the only one that the Holy Scriptures accredit and defend. Since not everyone can know the Holy Scriptures, some because they cannot read, others because their occupations prevent them from doing so, so that no soul may perish through ignorance, we have summarised, in the few verses of the symbol, the whole of the dogmas of the faith...

It goes on for quite a while, but basically it says that we should ignore anyone who tries to lead us astray from our faith as derived from the Holy Scriptures (in summary). Let me just say that everything written here comes from the Holy Scriptures. It is not my message, nor is it something I have invented; it is a message from God, and you, pastors, continue to ignore it. So, I could say these same words to you: ‘... you do not know how to read ...’ and ‘... so that your souls do not perish in ignorance ...’, because in the end you are ignorant of all that is in the Holy Scriptures (unfortunately for you, you are no longer ignorant). And you? Will you tell the world so that ‘no soul perishes through ignorance’ or will you let them fall while you calmly leaf through the key that can save them?

In conclusión
In short, from all this I can deduce two simple things:
∎ That you pastors today are going in the opposite direction. That by informing yourselves, your sin is worse, because now there is intent. The reason for that intention may be to maintain your comfortable status, I do not know, but it is strong enough to see millions of lost souls falling into hell without you doing anything, when I have given you the means to save them. Only you can make known all that God has shown to be understandable to them, to the deaf, to the world. Why is it understandable to the man of today? For that very reason, because it is impossible that these hidden messages were designed by man, what is written becomes scientific evidence or proof for the deaf. But the devil has made sure that in the world, lies, falsehoods, and appearances are the order of the day. Today, a head of government can speak and be telling nothing but lies. However, the world still believes you, at least it believes you are sincere; they think you believe what you say. Only you can convey this.
∎ That the end of the world is approaching, for something like this is written: at the end of time, knowledge of the Lord will spread. I would like to think that spreading does not refer only to the internet.

Matt 13:51-52 ‘Have you understood all this?’ They said to him, ‘Yes.’  52 And he said to them, ‘Therefore every scribe who has been trained for the kingdom of heaven is like a householder who brings out of his treasure what is new and what is old.’

This house is the soul from which old things (from our time in heaven) and new things (from our human nature) are drawn. And this is reflected in the Parables of the Kingdom, so that until today we have only seen in them the new things (of the earth), and those of heaven, revealed here, remained hidden. Referring to the scribe or clerk is like referring to what has been said, recorded, and published, for they also acted as notaries. It is as if I were to say, ‘a notary of heaven would write about the things that happened there and those that happened here.’ In the normal sense, from the world's perspective, these words of Jesus make no sense, but when seen from heaven and after speaking of the Parables of the Kingdom, which indeed also speak to us from heaven, they find their meaning. Well, think of me as that scribe who speaks of heaven and earth. Perhaps then everything will fall into place.

 

18 November 2025. The final nail in your coffin.

God knows that I have always admired priests. They are courageous people who have stepped forward to serve God and mankind. They have the wisdom that allows them to place their lives in the hands of the Lord and not in the world, sacrificing some of the fruits of this world. Undoubtedly, when they took that step, they were guided by the Holy Spirit, who is usually their best companion, without whom it would be extremely difficult and discouraging to lead the life they lead (in my opinion). I also have a brother who is a priest, so I do not believe that my words can be confused with those of an enemy.
That said, and with the exception of those priests who only rule over their parish, I will elaborate on part of the previous comment to show you how empty the whitewashed tombs of the high hierarchies of pastors are, or soon will be if they continue like this, and not only those of the Catholic Church. Although some say that their religion has no hierarchy, there is always someone calling the shots. (It is true that this comment is mainly directed at Christians.)

Mar 3:22-29 And the scribes who had come down from Jerusalem said, “He has Beelzebub!” and “By the prince of demons he casts out demons!”  (23)  And calling them to him, he said to them in parables, 'How can Satan cast out Satan?  (24)  If a kingdom is divided against itself, that kingdom cannot stand.  (25)  And if a house is divided against itself, that house cannot stand.  (26)  And if Satan rises up against himself and is divided, he cannot stand, but has an end.  (27)  But no one can enter the strong man's house and plunder his goods, unless he first binds the strong man; then he can plunder his house.  Truly I tell you, all sins and blasphemies that the sons of men blaspheme will be forgiven them,  (29) but whoever blasphemes against the Holy Spirit will never be forgiven, but is guilty of an eternal sin.

I said that this Word speaks to us of the incompatibility of the Holy Spirit with evil. Jesus could not be clearer; he even speaks of a house to represent our soul. Thus, evil cannot mix or coexist with the Holy Spirit unless the Holy Spirit has subdued or killed it, as this Word exemplifies, which will never happen, not even when the demons fought together in heaven with another nature. The Holy Spirit cannot mix with evil. I also said that our nature is composed of our soul and the Holy Spirit when we have it, and I did not give much importance to the body because I considered it a burden. However, it is a very important burden because it allows us to “live” or move around exercising our freedom even though we do not have the Holy Spirit within us. God is perfect and has designed the entire universe. Wouldn't He find a way to allow us to prove our loyalty and righteousness while also enabling us to coexist with the Holy Spirit in moments when we are pure? Or are you perfect and holy and always pure? The body is the perfect vehicle that also allowed men (formerly traitorous angels) to be tested in righteousness before Christ, before human nature was validated as fit to receive the Holy Spirit (after Jesus descends to Sheol for the righteous).
If we were perfect or had the Holy Spirit from Baptism, why continue the trial, why fight against temptations, why all this?   I am not going to tell you, as I believe the Dominicans say (I have written this somewhere), that with the Holy Spirit you cannot sin, or that we are predestined by Him to be saved because He induces you to do good (or something like that). In fact, that is the problem, that even with the Holy Spirit you can sin. However, it is a great help, because the Spirit acts within you. I said in another comment that the Holy Spirit united with you is like a source from which good flows and which then pushes your will (freedom, person) so that this good action, this good being, comes outwards. However, you have the last word. It makes no sense that if your person chooses to do evil and sin gravely, preventing good from springing forth from the Spirit, cutting off that source that previously flowed from within your being, it should remain locked up, without breathing or at least without living, because that is the nature of the Holy Spirit, good, love; intense, pure, radiant white. It cannot live in darkness.

Therefore, I maintain that the main purpose of our body is that it can carry our soul even if it is empty of the Holy Spirit, so that we can still exercise our freedom (we saw this in those who died before Christ and waited in Sheol). Is this God's whim? No. It is because of the nature of the Holy Spirit that it cannot live with sin, at least with grave sin; as I have repeated elsewhere, the Holy Spirit will live within us until it can no longer live, just as happens to the body with biological life. The Lord has done many similar things in the world so that one day we too may discern in the heavenly realm.

Returning to the reading, Jesus says that blaspheming against the Holy Spirit is unforgivable. For the Scribes said that he had the devil inside him. Now let us consider the opposite case. A baptised demoniac, of whom there are some, whom you say has the Holy Spirit inside him. That is to say, his hypothetical actions (murder, paedophilia, hatred...) would be suggested, and could even spring from the Holy Spirit itself. And according to this, is it not clear that when you say that all baptised persons have the Holy Spirit, you are blaspheming against Him? Perhaps you are no longer forgivable, although it is true that unlike human justice, divine justice is influenced by ignorance. But now you know; let this not be the last nail in your coffin empty of the Holy Spirit, in your tomb empty and whitewashed on the outside.
And once the major is denied, I tell you that you don't need to have a demon inside you; sins also drive away the Holy Spirit. Thank goodness God has given us bodies, because otherwise we would be lying on the ground like squashed worms, unable to move, just as happened after the rebellion when, after our betrayal, we were left like cracked cisterns. That is how a balloon filled with gas is: it can fly, but if you take the gas out, it is nothing. Again, similarities, perhaps. And do you not realise that all the mess in the world, our bodies, the Universe and all that, has been made by God so that we might rightly recover the Holy Spirit, Pure and Eternal Substance (Person of God), which sustains Celestial Nature, the Kingdom of Heaven?
Or what do you think? That no baptised person will go to hell? Unfortunately, they will. And if so, according to you, will the Holy Spirit sealed in those souls also go to hell? No. That is more of your blasphemy.
Don't you realise that even Jesus Christ had the Holy Spirit taken from him on the cross (My God, why have you forsaken me?) to prove his human nature (body plus empty soul) as a man, and thus validate it to receive the Holy Spirit? And yet he was without sin, so no soul should have a greater seal with the Spirit. I say this because of the seal that you say is unalterable.

Indeed, after the betrayal, we were left with broken souls, like worms crushed in the heaven. Just like demons. That was the justice that united us in betrayal. The difference is that God, once that justice was fulfilled, gave us human nature, since He gives it to whomever He wants once the claims for that supposed injustice of saving the angels who did not hate (but rather betrayed out of love for their partners, as depicted in the Bible as Adam's love for Eve), and not saving those who did (those who hated God and started the rebellion, the demons). That human nature initially consisted of our repaired soul, but incapable of receiving the Holy Spirit (since this nature had to be validated first, just as the heavenly nature was validated, by the same founding or validating principle: Jesus Christ, in order to comply with all justice that separated us from the ‘injustice’ claimed by the demons) and a vehicle for exercising our freedom even with an empty soul (the body).
The demons were also given the same time as us, according to the Bible, which says that once they were defeated, they were revived and given time (I don't remember where, I studied it in a prophet or in the psalms, nor do I remember if it was clearly stated or hidden. And I don't feel like looking it up either). This is how they are allowed to stalk us and whisper in our ears, for which purpose their broken soul is completely removed, leaving them atrophied and unable to exercise freedom (this is not in the Bible, it is just common sense). We said that they remained like a virus, with us as the cells to be attacked. You will never see a demon considering doing good; they are not like those lions in the videos that do not attack a gazelle calf that approaches them happily. And again we see an example in the world that perhaps God put there so that we can compare something similar, so that we can understand our enemy; I say this because it is extremely rare: The vinegar fly, which lives for one day because it has no stomach, does not worry about food, its smell, or searching for it. It has only one thing programmed: to reproduce. Something similar happens to demons. They no longer have a soul, not even that broken soul. They only have hatred towards God and towards us who still have the freedom to do good, to love. They only want to destroy us, and if they can dwell in someone's soul, so much the better. Perhaps the soul is what they miss most, that stomach of the vinegar fly that cannot be filled with food, that soul that cannot be filled with the Holy Spirit.

In summary, pastors, do not stubbornly cling to those rigid conclusions that came only from one part of Scripture, because you may become stubborn in blasphemy against the Holy Spirit, no less. Remember the reading about the Samaritan two or three comments ago, how the Levite and the Priest were walking downhill, also referring to our times, to how pastors are distancing themselves from heaven. This blasphemy may be the last nail in your coffin, for this sin is unforgivable. I would tap you on the head like the villain in Back to the Future did to McFly, but I suspect that even then you would not take notice. Anyway, it is your soul. The pity is that many more depend on you.

One final note: If you access the site via a VPN, the host will display a Captcha before you enter the page. This is a security measure for all pages hosted on their server. It is not my doing. This website does not check any IP addresses or other data from its visitors.

7 December 2025. The Branch of Jesse.

Isa 11:1-10  There shall come forth a shoot from the stump of Jesse, and a branch shall grow out of his roots.  (2)  And the Spirit of the LORD shall rest upon him, the spirit of wisdom and understanding, the spirit of counsel and might, the spirit of knowledge and the fear of the LORD. …   (6)  The wolf shall dwell with the lamb, and the leopard shall lie down with the kid, and the calf and the lion and the fatling together, and a little child shall lead them.  (7)  The cow and the bear shall feed; their young shall lie down together; and the lion shall eat straw like the ox.  (8)  The sucking child shall play over the hole of the asp, and the weaned child shall put his hand on the adder's den.  (9)  They shall not hurt or destroy in all my holy mountain; for the earth shall be full of the knowledge of the LORD as the waters cover the sea.  (10)  In that day the root of Jesse shall stand as an ensign to the peoples; him shall the nations seek, and his dwellings shall be glorious.

Isaiah 11:1... also speaks of a shoot coming up from the roots of the stem of Jesse. In this reading the stem of Jesse is God the Father, the offspring, his son Jesus Christ and the roots of Jesse also represent Jesus, but in the nature of man (the root that goes into the darkness of the earth; ugly and twisted, because he takes the form of sin like us to save us); a shoot will come from this root, it refers to that 'Elijah' who reconciles fathers with sons (Adams with Eves, cows with bears, lions will eat straw...), before the end of the world [since fathers and sons are not paradigms of enmity, it seems to refer, as other times, to us in heaven - fathers - and what is left on earth - sons - i.e. we will be aware of our personal sin in heaven, confirming that God is just and cannot condemn us for the sin of others - Adam and Eve-. This will cause everything to be fulfilled in justice and logic, which in turn will clarify the Scriptures with their 3 ½ Times and cause also the fools -Evas, lions, bears...- to recognise God by reason -reconcile Adams with Eves...-]. It comes from Jesus (springs from the root) because humanity is now, after the passion, redeemed and capable of the Spirit. That is to say, he will not be a spotless angel sent from heaven as Mary was to fulfil her mission, but a man who has reached heaven because he has already passed the test. In (10) the root of Jesse again refers to Jesus Christ.
Well, on a daily basis we should all be prophets to our brethren (we should be the ones who bring light to them). This prophet to come, then, does not refer to Christ himself, but to the one who precedes and announces him as we can see:

Isa 41:25-29 "I have raised up a man from the north, and he is coming from the east. He will call on My name, and tread on princes like mud, as a potter treads on clay. 26 "Who has announced it from the beginning, that we may know, or from long ago, and we will say, 'It is true'? But there is no one who announces, nor who teaches, nor even who hears your words. 27 "I am the first to speak these things to Zion, and to give Jerusalem a bearer of glad tidings. 28 "I looked, and there was none. I asked about these things, and there was no counselor. I asked, and they answered not a word. 29 For all idols are vanity, and their works are nothing. Wind and vanity are their images."

This one he calls from the north is the shoot that comes out of the root of Jesse. It means that he comes from those redeemed by Jesus (the root of Jesse). From the north come the traitors, sinners (It says he raised him from there), but he comes from the east (where the sun rises = God), meaning that he was redeemed. In 26 it says what in this book I have shown; announcements made from long ago, which have only one answer: "It is true". So it seems that he does not find this counsellor, but then, in what follows, he does find him.

Isa 42:1-25 "Here is my Servant, whom I will uphold. My Chosen One, in whom I delight. I have put My Spirit upon him, and he will bring justice to the nations. 2 "He shall not cry out, nor lift up his voice, nor make it heard in the streets. 3 He shall not break the bruised reed, nor quench the smouldering wick. Faithfully he will bring justice. 4 "He will not grow weary, nor faint, Till He establishes righteousness in the earth, And the isles shall wait for His law."

This one here is not Jesus, but the shoot that comes out of Him (from His roots). "He will not break the waterfall, nor quench the smouldering wick" speaks of him, not what he will do because any normal person does not attack, break, or extinguish the weak; it would not be noteworthy that this one here will not break the weak. And if we were to speak of Jesus he would be described as a torrent of Light. This one however is in ill health (bruised reed, will not break), and is not a saint (the smoking flame will not be extinguished). It is then confirmed in:

19 "Who is blind, but my servant? Who is deaf, like my messenger? Who is blind like my envoy, the servant of the Eternal, 20 "who sees many things, and does not warn; who opens his ears, and does not hear?"

This one here will speak of justice (1), and the islands will wait for his law. I think I put it this way, the islands surrounded by sea or death may be the Eves, not those who already have a path. Since the islands are often named as part of these 7 groups, it may be that there are not really 7 religions but 6 and the "islands" group does not have a specific religion (in which case the fools would not be distributed beforehand among each religion. Both options are possible).

5 Thus says God, the Eternal One, the Creator of the heavens, who spreads them out, who spreads out the earth and its produce, who gives breath to the people who dwell in it, and life to those who walk on it: 6 "I, the Eternal One, have called you in righteousness, and I will uphold you by the hand. I will keep you, and make you a covenant of the people, a light of the nations.7 "That you may open the eyes of the blind, and bring out the prisoners from the prison, and those who sit in darkness from the prison.8 "This is my name, I, the Eternal, and to another I will not give my glory, nor my praise to graven images. 9 "The former predictions have been fulfilled. I announce the things that are to come, I announce them before they come to pass. 10 Sing to the Eternal a new song, sing his praise from the ends of the earth, sing the sea and all that is in it, the isles and their inhabitants! 11 Let the wilderness and its cities sing, the villages where Kedar dwells. Let the inhabitants of Shelah sing, and from the top of the mountains let them shout for joy. 12 Let them glorify the LORD, and preach his praise in the isles. 13 The Eternal shall go forth as a giant, and as a man of war shall he stir up jealousy. He shall cry out, he shall shout, he shall shout, he shall strive against his enemies. 14 "From everlasting I have kept silence, I have kept silence, I have held my peace. But now I will cry out like a woman in travail; I will lay waste and devour. 15 I will lay waste mountains and hills, I will wither all their grass. I will make the rivers into islands, and dry up the pools. 16 I will lead the blind by a way they have not known, I will make them tread in paths they have not known; I will turn the darkness into light before them, and the rugged into a plain. This I will do, and I will not forsake them. 17 "Those who trust in idols and say to the molten statues, 'You are our gods,' shall be turned back and greatly confounded. 18 "Deaf, hear; and you blind, look and see! 19 "Who is blind but my servant? Who is deaf, like my messenger? Who is blind like my envoy, the servant of the Eternal, 20 "who sees many things, and does not perceive; who opens his ears, and does not hear?" 21 The Eternal was pleased for love of his justice to magnify his Law, and to magnify it. 22 But this is a people plundered and trodden under foot, all trapped in caves and hidden in prisons. They are sacked, and there is none to deliver; they are trodden under foot, and there is none to say, "Restore". 23 Who among you will hear this? who will hearken and hear of the future? 24 Who gave Jacob as a prey, and delivered Israel to spoilers? was it not the Eternal, against whom we sinned? And they would not walk in his ways, nor hearken to his law. 25 Therefore he poured upon them his fierce anger, and the power of war. He set fire on them on every side, and they did not understand; he consumed them, and they did not listen.

The rest seems clear, it is what is going to happen in no time. It would be good to ask ourselves the questions in verse 23.

A book, the cure for deafness.

From chapter 29 (or 28) of Isaiah onwards he laments in several chapters of those who go down to Egypt but then shows how the Eves will hear.

Isa 29:1-24 Alas, Ariel, Ariel, the village where David has encamped! Add year upon year, the feasts complete their cycle, 2 and I will put Ariel in anguish, and there shall be weeping and wailing. She shall be to me an Ariel; 3 I will encamp in a circle against you, I will tighten against you the entrenchment, and I will raise against you a trench; 4 you shall be cast down, from the earth you shall speak, your word shall be choked by the dust, your voice shall be as a spectre from the earth, and from the dust your word shall be as a whisper. 5 ... 6 From Yahweh Sebaoth you shall be visited with thunder, with noise, with roaring and clattering, with storm, with storm, and with a devouring flame of fire. 7 It shall be like a dream, a vision of the night, the multitude of all the nations that war against Ariel, all her militia, and the forces of war that oppress her. 8 ... 10 For Yahweh has poured upon you the spirit of slumber, he has glued your eyes (prophets) and covered your heads (seers). 11 And every revelation shall be to you as the words of a sealed book, which is given to one who is learned in letters, saying, 'Yes, read that,' and the other says, 'I cannot; it is sealed. 12 Then the book is passed to one who is illiterate, saying, "Please read it," and he says, "I cannot read. "13 ... 14 Therefore behold, I continue to work wonders with that people, to do marvellous wonders; I shall lose the wisdom of their wise men, and overshadow the understanding of their wise men. 15 ... 17 Is it not but a little while, that Lebanon shall be turned into a garden, and the garden into a forest? 18 In that day the deaf shall hear the words of a book, and the eyes of the blind shall see them out of darkness and out of gloom, 19 and the poor shall rejoice in Yahweh, and the poorest of men shall rejoice in the Holy One of Israel. 20 .... 24 The wanderers shall gain understanding, and the murmurers shall learn doctrine.

Here we are told the full story of the Eves: of their betrayal from heaven (1-9), of their blindness on earth (10-12), and of how their eyes will be opened by a book (18).

Isa 30:1 Woe to the rebellious children - oracle of Yahweh - to execute plans, which are not mine, and to make libations of covenant, but not in my sight, heaping sin upon sin! ...10 Now come, write it on a tablet, engrave it in a book, and let it endure to the last day, for a testimony for ever: 9 Which is a stubborn people... 10 Who have said to the seers: "See ye not"; and to visionaries: "See not for us true visions; speak flattering things to us, behold illusions. 11 ...18 Yet Yahweh will wait to be gracious to you, and so he will rise up to have compassion on you, for Yahweh is a God of justice: blessed are all those who hope in him! 19 ... 20 The LORD will give you siege bread and rationed water, and afterward he who teaches you will no longer hide himself; with your eyes you will see him who teaches you, 21 and with your ears you will hear behind you these words, "That is the way, go in it, whether to the right or to the left."

He laments now for the rebellious, mentioning also a book and a grace of God (of equity) that waits and arises (18). He speaks of them "seeing" the one who teaches him (20) and "That is the way, go ye in it, whether it be to the right hand, or to the left." What does this sound like to us? Doesn't it really seem to say that there is more than one way leading to the same place?
Chapters 31 and 32 also speak of those who go down to Egypt and of the indolent women, and in both God forgives them. Ch.35 also speaks of redemption and of the deaf who will hear.

11 December 25. Yes, again: it was all written...

NOTE: In this commentary, I have taken readings from the Protestant Textual Bible, which is very literal and hardly differs from the Catholic versions in this regard.

Isa 26:13-21 O YHVH our God, other masters besides you have ruled over us,
But we acknowledge only your Name, yours alone.
(14) The dead shall not live,
The shadows shall not rise,
For you have judged them and destroyed them,
And made their memory perish. 
(15)  You have multiplied the people, O YHVH,
You have multiplied the people and manifested your glory:
You have enlarged the borders of the country.
 (16)  O YHVH, in distress they sought you;
They poured out their prayer when the force of your punishment intensified.
 (17)  Like a woman in labour,
She writhes and cries out in pain,
So we have been in your presence, O YHVH. 
(18)  We conceived, we writhed,
But we gave birth to wind;
We brought no salvation to the land,
Nor were inhabitants born to the world. 
(19)  Your dead shall live! With my dead body they shall rise again! Awake and sing joyfully, inhabitants of the dust! For your dew is the dew of light, the earth shall give birth to the shadows. 
(20)  Go, my people, enter your chambers;
Close your doors behind you,
hide yourselves for a brief moment,
until the indignation has passed. 
(21)  Behold, YHVH comes forth from his dwelling place,
to punish the guilt of the inhabitants of the earth:
the earth will reveal the blood that has been shed,
it will no longer cover those who have been slain in it.

This passage from Isaiah, which comes from today's Office of Readings, tells us what happened to us in heaven. I am taking it from the middle, although the rest is relevant, it is not as interesting. It is incredible how Isaiah prophesies the future to us when he speaks of Jesus Christ in his various prefigurations, which we have already discussed, and also tells us about our past in heaven.

(13) O YHVH our God, other masters besides you have ruled over us,
But we acknowledge only your Name, yours alone.

In verse 13, ‘others have dominated us’ refers to demons (for the more experienced: this phrase corresponds to the 2nd Age). Not only because they convinced the Evas and they in turn convinced us, the Adams, but also because after the defeat of the traitors (the demons + the angels Eva and Adam), they try to protect themselves behind us by asking for our same fate (remember that the Adams betray out of love for the Evas, the demons out of hatred for God and greed).

(14) The dead shall not live,
The shadows shall not rise,
For you have judged them and destroyed them,
And made their memory perish. 

The dead are us and the Eves; the shadows are the demons. Thus, the latter will not achieve what they wanted: to escape punishment and continue living in heaven (nor, of course, to be like God). Because both were destroyed in our former heavenly nature. Note the distinction he makes between the dead who will not live (without the Holy Spirit) and the shadows that will not rise. Note also that it erases our memory (it does not refer to the memory of history, since later it will resurrect those dead, us). This is the first time I have seen memory mentioned in the Bible, even though I have already told you (according to this, it seems that it also erases the memory of demons, although it is somewhat ambiguous).

(15)  You have multiplied the people, O YHVH,
You have multiplied the people and manifested your glory:
You have enlarged the borders of the country.

This refers to multiplying natures by two, one heavenly and one human, in order to save us. So yes, it does have to do with the above. Expanding the boundaries of the country is creating the Universe outside of heaven, or outside of Eden, where we have been told we were as ‘men’. There, in the Universe, is where the test to try to save us will take place, and where the new human nature will be validated so that it is capable of receiving the Holy Spirit (on the cross, tested by the only possible validator, the one who validated the primary Celestial Nature—everything was created by him and in him, [or for him, I no longer remember]).

(16)  O YHVH, in distress they sought you;
They poured out their prayer when the force of your punishment intensified.
 (17)  Like a woman in labour,
She writhes and cries out in pain,
So we have been in your presence, O YHVH. 
(18)  We conceived, we writhed,
But we gave birth to wind;
We brought no salvation to the land,
Nor were inhabitants born to the world. 

Both this part and the previous two are described in the indefinite past tense, and occur at the same time.
(16) again refers to that second time in which we find ourselves throughout this Word (defeated after the betrayal). In the Psalms from Heaven, we can clearly see how the demons set traps for us here to make us seem as guilty as they are and thus receive our same fate. In the second time, we ask God for help, and although we are punished by having our old nature taken away and being emptied, equating our punishment to that of the demons (to fulfil all justice), He already designs the plan to try to save us; for once justice is fulfilled, God can give that new created nature to whomever He wants. Likewise, to fulfil the justice that deprived us of the Holy Spirit, it will be Jesus who validates this new human nature as fit to receive the Spirit, thus making it totally independent of the heavenly nature (which was validated in the same way, by the same validating seal: Jesus Christ). Both natures have the same validating principle, but they run parallel to each other without any dependence between them.

Returning to where we were (in the second time after being defeated in heaven); from verse 18 onwards, it tells us how we lose that Holy Spirit. How we are left empty: like a woman in labour who gives birth to wind. It could not be clearer. In one psalm, the destruction of our nature is also clearly expressed, speaking of childbirth and the destruction of our ‘ships’:

Psalm 48:4-7 Behold, the kings of the earth took counsel, and drew near together against this city and mountain. But when they saw it, they were dismayed; they were sore troubled, they fled away in fear. Their terror was as the pains of a woman in travail. Thou didst break the ships of Tarshish with a south wind.

(19)  Your dead shall live! With my dead body they shall rise again! Awake and sing joyfully, inhabitants of the dust! For your dew is the dew of light, the earth shall give birth to the shadows. 
(20)  Go, my people, enter your chambers;
Close your doors behind you,
hide yourselves for a brief moment,
until the indignation has passed. 

As I was saying, those dead people from before are us. The reference to “my dead body” may refer to Jesus on the Cross, who, as we know (or rather, as I claim), had the Holy Spirit withdrawn from him during the crucifixion in order to be tested as a man alone, to see if human nature is fit to receive the Holy Spirit (My God, why have you forsaken me?); hence he is a ‘dead body’, without Spirit (I do not think it refers to the death of Jesus as such on the cross, although it could also be). 'For your dew is the dew of light' tells us that this Life clearly refers to the Holy Spirit, since we were those walking dead. “The Earth will give birth to shadows” may refer in general to the fact that demons will be expelled (or ignored) from where the Holy Spirit now is. The same verb ‘will give birth’ is used to contrast that loss of the Holy Spirit that leads us to death in heaven with that Life or Holy Spirit that returns to us (the dead on earth before the Passion, the living after it), which will help us fight against evil.
The last part (20), since ‘they will live’ is said in the future tense and we were previously talking about betrayal in heaven and the consequences (from the 2nd Time), surely refers to us locking ourselves in our bodies (our room) until everything passes.

(21)  Behold, YHVH comes forth from his dwelling place,
to punish the guilt of the inhabitants of the earth:
the earth will reveal the blood that has been shed,
it will no longer cover those who have been slain in it.

And this (21) will be the end of everything that happens (until everything comes to an end): the coming end of the world.

As you can see, shepherds, it is all written right in front of your eyes. But you continue to ignore it, increasing the number of lost souls that weigh on your shoulders.

16 December 2025. About the Hidden in the Bible.

We begin with a children's story featuring a talking snake, in which the protagonist is beguiled by a foolish woman (who has previously been convinced by the evil snake). Freedom, or the possible decisions to be made in this fable, are shown as the fruits of many trees to eat, and error is described as the decision to eat an apple from a tree called the “tree of knowledge”. In fact, this knowledge is the knowledge of doing evil: X ERROR! (not just good). The consequence is that we find ourselves naked and outside of Eden, a wonderful place without any hardship.

Perhaps some had already come to the conclusion that these passages from the Bible were a fable, but how can we recognise that this part represents the rebellion in heaven? That the participants in this rebellion of angels are shown here? Most importantly, if we answer these questions in the affirmative, we must understand that the “men” Adam and Eve were part of that heavenly nature, part of those angels involved in the rebellion, and that they ended up being expelled from heaven with a different nature (you will give birth in pain, you will have to search for food...).

Since the Bible describes the rebellion in heaven and how the fallen angels are expelled from there, we only have to put both parts together and ask ourselves: If the devil was expelled from heaven, why was he in this idyllic place with us? Or, without going into too much detail, did man (being man) live with the angels and talk to them? And then he spoke with the devil... because that much is clear: the talking serpent in heaven (or in that wonderful place) represents the devil. But this would only make sense if the devil convinced those men before the rebellion, because afterwards he is also expelled (you will crawl on the ground), the reason for that expulsion being to convince Adam and Eve, ergo, we are talking about the rebellion itself.

The main consequence of this fable, which goes unnoticed, is the ‘realisation’ that we are naked. In the Bible, clothing very often represents the Holy Spirit that each person possesses (wears). Heavenly beings, angels, have that Holy Spirit within them at all times. Before the rebellion, it was impossible to conceive of an angel without the Holy Spirit. Hence the passage asks, ‘Who has made you realise that you are naked?’ The worst consequence is losing that Holy Spirit, which is a prerequisite for changing one's nature.

This way of hiding our lives (each one of us) in heaven is repeated continuously throughout the Bible, as will be seen in this essay. And the way in which God has chosen to hide it so that one day (like today) we would realise it, is by describing the same three and a half stages of the life of “humanity” (3 and a half times) throughout the Bible. This is done by different authors (Genesis, Six of the Prophets, Psalms, Revelation, Gospel), separated by years, centuries or more than a millennium of difference, so that many of them did not coincide in time, making it impossible for them to have communicated with each other; even more so when it is a hidden secret that has only now been discovered.

The three and a half times are:
1st When we were with God as heavenly beings and rebelled.
2nd Defeated, with God but empty of Him, our future is decided.
3rd Expelled from heaven, on Earth unable to receive the Holy Spirit (before Jesus Christ).
Last ½ Time: On Earth, able to contain God again, the Holy Spirit. After the Passion.

Thus, we see in the Bible different ways of representing this moment of rebellion. In Jeremiah, for example, he equates our loss of nature and loss of the Holy Spirit with breaking a pot and being remade by the potter. Or with becoming broken cisterns: Jer 2:13 they left my spring of Living Waters to make themselves broken cisterns (Water in the Bible, like Oil, Garments, and Gold, often represents the Holy Spirit). Each one uses his own way of codifying it, but everything is written according to those three and a half times (you have to read it in the essay to realise this).

To give you an example, here is a brief excerpt from the Prophet Daniel (again, you must read the entire essay to confirm that everything is written to mean the same thing), where he tells us about a disembodied hand that, during a celebration of King Nebuchadnezzar, writes four words on the wall: Mene, Mene, Tekel, Upharsin, to which the prophet gives meaning.

Let us look at the meanings Daniel gives to the king.
Mene: God has numbered the days of your reign and brought it to an end.
Mene: God has numbered the days of your reign and brought it to an end.
Tekel: you have been weighed in the balances and found wanting.
Upharsin: Your kingdom has been divided and given to the Medes and Persians.

What this actually means in the hidden context of Daniel's writing:

The first two Mene tell us about our first two periods of betrayal. The first is at the very moment we rise, and the second is alongside God, but not in God; we are not yet on earth. This pre-earth phase is also separate because they are Nebuchadnezzar's dreams, which, curiously, as seen in the essay, in his second dream (which corresponds to the Second Time) he is warned that he will become an animal without a soul, which is fulfilled (as it is written) for seven years until he recognises God. This is basically what happens to us after being expelled from heaven (God has counted the days of your reign and brought them to an end) and not being able to receive the Holy Spirit until Christ rescues us in His passion or, if you will, for each one of us, until the end of our life here when we are judged and return (those who can) to heaven.

Tekel would be our time in the world (the third age), before the Passion. During this time, as I say, man cannot receive the Holy Spirit and is empty. This is described here as us lacking weight.

Upharsin is our last half-time. We can now receive the Spirit. Here it refers to the word ‘kingdom’, which also designates all of us who have ever received the Holy Spirit. It says that it is divided, which I believe refers to how we are left after the Passion of Christ. Some, those who can hear, who are the Adams [this is for justice: as the Eves are deceived by the demons in heaven and cause the Adams to fall, on earth only the Adams who do listen to God can convince the Eves to follow God, because here ‘they’ continue to have ears only for the demons and their idols], are confronted by those who do not (the Eves). This only becomes clear when we can receive the Holy Spirit, for it is the Holy Spirit that distinguishes us from one another. Furthermore, Jesus himself says: Matthew 10:34 Do not think that I have come to bring peace to the earth; I have not come to bring peace, but a sword.  [Father against son... speaks of division]. Thus, your Kingdom (Kingdom of Heaven: Holy Spirit) is divided between Adams who have it and Eves who do not. On the other hand, when it says that it “is divided into two”, it also speaks of something divided into two, a time divided between two = half time.

Note: Some translations have removed a “Mene” thinking it was a meaningless error, a repetition; however, most have kept it. Those who removed it will see that it did make sense.
Another note: I like how this comment turned out, so I'm putting it as an introduction to God for Dummies (and smart people), which I will update later in the virtual book.

23 December 2025. What now?

In the essay, God has already been proven. And under the same principle of Justice that sustains Him, the validity of His different paths for the seven different nations has also been proven. These, in turn, have also been shown many times in the Bible, designating humanity as divided into groups.

We Christians believed we were the cream of the crop. So much doctrine, so many scholars, so much theology, and it turns out that, after all, like everyone else, we had only been shown one of two sides. Of course, now so much conceit, so much embellishment, so much sublimation is difficult to tone down, as difficult as finding humility in people of high rank.

Today, the illustrious leaders of the church are like the teacher who is parking his car in front of the school and realises that all the children in his class are watching him through the classroom windows. He has a terrible time parking, and only after many manoeuvres does he succeed. But when he gets out, he realises that the rear wheels are on the yellow line. Well, luckily no one sees it; the children cannot see it from their windows, and since the local police officer knows him, it is unlikely that he will tow the car away and give him a fine. So he continues on his way towards them with his head held high and his gaze steady. How embarrassing it would be to go back to the car to manoeuvre again!
Worse still, you are like someone piloting a spaceship with billions of people on board and having to land on a planet close to the sun. Many of your men died during the manoeuvres, so now, with everyone watching, you prefer to leave the ship over a nation that lived there and cause its inhabitants to die deprived of sunlight. After all, no one on the ship has noticed their existence, and if they have, they ignore them just as you do.

Don't you realise that everything that has been revealed to us is wonderful? That it gives meaning to our lives, especially to those who did not see God? (In fact, the meaning of life has been revealed.)  That all the murky questions they attributed to God (if He loved us, then...) have been clarified? Can't you see that now even the blind and the foolish will be able to see?

Don't you realise that it is wonderful to know that other paths, Islam, Taoism, Hare Krishna... have also been laid down by God? That it is now easier to see them as brothers? And it is not that they can also be saved by God's mercy, as even in your limited understanding you had imagined, but that God designed their paths or religions specifically so that they too could be saved, for we are different since we were created in heaven and He has set us on different paths adapted to our different disabilities. We have different sizes of soul, so we need different amounts to fill us.

Don't you see that as a Christian I can affirm that there is only one God, who is Allah, and that Muhammad is his messenger (which de facto makes me a Muslim), and yet I remain a Christian?

And couldn't a Muslim, given what has been revealed here, say that Jesus Christ is the means by which God has saved humanity? Doesn't the Qur'an say something like that the Jews were lost because they ignored the “prophet” that God sent them, referring to Jesus Christ? [I don't remember the exact words.] And if the Jews had listened to him, wouldn't they then have been saved?

It is true that Muslims do not call Jesus the Son of God, because they do not know that many of them are also children of God. Anyone who has the Holy Spirit within them, God within them, is a child of God (we know this for sure: although there is only one God, you, I and so many others can feel God within us). Thus, God has surely taught us the word ‘son’ and placed it in our history and our nature, so that we may understand that just as your son is the one who carries your blood, so is the one who carries His Holy Spirit (the one who carries His Essence within) a son of God. Of course, Jesus is the firstborn, and because he was the first, he validated the heavenly nature (or created nature capable of containing the Holy Spirit). The difference is that He, Jesus, is in the Source. Through Him flows the Essence of God, the Holy Spirit in maximum intensity, in that of God the Father. But he is equal to us in creation. In fact, He is the seal or imprint that validated the angels first, and then men. Why? Because first the mould is created, and if it pleases us, if it meets our expectations, if it is as we want it, then we will create the collection. This is how we men do it, the difference being that God is God and does not make linear collections. In each of the created beings, in their original nature, He added a particular person whom He knows intimately, even better than we know ourselves, for He is the craftsman who has created each person. This is why He loves us so much and is juggling to try to save us in this world.

Speaking of Muslims, I was going to tell you that just as Isaiah in the penultimate comment (‘11 Dec 2025 Yes, again; it was all written’) speaks of the dead and the living dead (I think it's interesting to read the comment), so the words of the envoy Mohammed are correct, and as a Christian I could also say them: ‘Jesus did not die on the cross, but it seemed to them that he was killed,’ because, like Isaiah, he speaks of inner death (I do not know if that was his intention, but that is how it was written by the will of the Lord; this is the language of God that we know from the hidden meaning of the Scriptures). And in fact, likewise, to take it literally is to confirm that for the world (it seemed) he was crucified, but that is another story. Like Isaiah, God moved Muhammad to write (or say) those words. Why? Because that is what really happened, considering that inner death or the emptiness of the Holy Spirit within us is what God fears most for us (and what we should fear most). So let us visualise the image: Jesus Christ on the cross, without the Holy Spirit (they took away his perfect garments, My God, why have you forsaken me? [all this was to test, or validate, man alone as man, without the help of the Holy Spirit]), surrounded by Pharisees and a few demons watching and cursing him. And what did those Pharisees surrounding him on the cross think when they saw the one who spoke of life after death telling God that he had abandoned him? What would the demons present there think when they saw Jesus on the cross without the Holy Spirit? Surely he would have hated his torturers, and the Holy Spirit had abandoned him (they believed they had killed him). But they did not kill him; it was on that very cross of death that Jesus regained the Holy Spirit a moment before his body died, for by loving as a man and forgiving his torturers, he regained that Holy Spirit as a man and at that moment validated human nature as fit to receive God. And that cross of death became a source of Life for all men, regardless of the true religion that God established for each one.

I was going to tell you that the associators who so displeased the envoy Muhammad are not Christians, because if they were, the Holy Qur'an would contradict itself, since somewhere it says that Christians who do good will see God (and other similar verses), and the Qur'an cannot contradict itself. It was written without contradictions.

I was going to tell you that God used his messenger Muhammad to unite and convert all the pre-Islamic cults of those times. The Lord sometimes uses great empires such as the Roman or Spanish to spread his faith. The point is that the Quran was written in a tone of war. Once those pre-Islamic cults were conquered or converted, someone must have said something like: ‘Now we have no enemies... what shall we do, since we do not understand the Holy Quran, which was written in times of war? From now on, Christians will be the associators’. They did not know how to take the best from the Holy Quran and, in fact, some have taken the worst: they have discarded the End to keep the means that achieved it (it would be interesting to read Islam, True Faith as well). Thus, where I see mercy and compassion as the main characteristics highlighted by the Qur'an, a few see hatred against the ‘infidels’ as paramount, and this is extremely dangerous for Muslims themselves. Hatred is not compatible with the Holy Spirit, with God. Nor is it compatible with heaven or the Gardens, or whatever we wish to call it. On the other hand, the term ‘infidel’ appears in some verses referring to those who know Islam but reject it (4:82-90, 9:73-74, 47:32), which would explain why it is mentioned so many times. Let us bear in mind that the prophet gave these pre-Islamic cults the choice between ‘converting’ or dying (which shows that he did not want them to die but to convert, because in reality he only gave them one option since those cults did not have true faith). In that situation, many conversions must not have been genuine but rather to save their own skins. Perhaps that is why the word infidel was mentioned so often later on, because in those days many of the conquered were not true believers.

I was going to say more to iron out our differences, but it would not matter if you were completely different, because your faith (even misunderstood by a few) is guided by mercy, and its destiny is mercy itself, as it could not be otherwise, since it is God, the merciful and compassionate One, who has traced it out.

So that is God's will: that we walk different paths but in the same direction. On a whim? No. Because He will never demand something of us that we cannot fulfil. The important thing for salvation is to have faith in Him, first and foremost, and secondly to turn our backs on the world and its idols and choose Him. We know how to do the first part, but the second part (turning our backs on the world) differs according to each religion. Because effectively, complying with the rules of your religion is turning your back on the world and choosing God, since that ‘effort’ is the result of a free choice. It would not be a true choice if there were no effort, because it is not a matter of plucking the petals off a daisy (she loves me, she loves me not). It is a choice on which our eternal life depends. Of course, the ultimate goal is to be filled with the Holy Spirit, to be filled with God. To feel at peace here on earth, and to do so, we are given these rules of religion. The thinking or way of functioning is this: to whom much is given, much will be asked. The greater the size of your soul, the more mercy you must show to your neighbour in order to fill your reservoir, to fill it up (the more you have to renounce yourself and the world, the harder your rules will be). It does not matter whether one is Muslim, Hare Krishna, Christian... each has their own path. This is why it is so important for each nation to follow its own path, its own rules. Because following another religion or other rules may not fulfil us. This is what God has done in His perfection, for our own good. And it is true that mercy laughs at judgement, because the merciful do not need a path, but we need to be very merciful; let us not risk going our own way.

But let's get back to the topic (sorry, whenever I talk about Muslims, I tend to ramble): What now?
If you have read the essay, you can no longer doubt the existence of God, nor doubt the infinite love He has for us (that is, if your heart harboured any shred of doubt). If you have read it, you also know that something is happening, for God is now showing Himself as He has never shown Himself before. And if you are honest with yourselves, you can only conclude that the end of the world is approaching and that He is going to call us into His presence to judge us. I would also ask pastors to be honest about their feelings regarding what has been revealed, since to deny it in order to continue with the status quo is to have no faith in God, given that everything has come from His Holy Scriptures. Let no one be ashamed to turn the car around, because one thing is very clear: even if the police officer knows you, he will fine you and, worse, take you to jail if you keep the world in ignorance. Many can be saved when you make it public. And this is God's will, that you make it public to save the Evas, or at least to give them the opportunity and thus fulfil all justice. Do not fight against God, you can only lose.

Wouldn't it be wonderful (the third time I've used this corny adjective) if Christians and Muslims showed the revelation together to the world? Not like one of those meetings between Christians and Muslims, which are all well and good but have no impact on society, but by showing the revelation for what it is: a revolution for us. Then the world would at least pause long enough to listen to the revelations, and since these are designed to demonstrate the existence of God (for He has revealed Himself in the Scriptures by means inexplicable to the world), many of those who are deaf may be saved.
And yes, all this is wonderful because it is God Himself who reveals Himself to the world. But you pastors are missing out by opposing His will. You stand in front of Him as enemies, and thus you will not be able to enjoy this wonderful time (5th). Perhaps after all you are like those Pharisees who did not want any change and turned their backs on Jesus Christ at His first coming, because one thing is clear: God is preparing us for the second coming of Jesus Christ.

Merry Christmas to all.

6 January 2026. The Three Wise Men and the Holy Spirit.

The Nativity Scene

Let's take a look at the nativity scene or Bethlehem according to the keys. First of all, it is not mentioned in the Gospels as we know it (with the ox and the mule), although the tradition of the Church, iconography and apparently some apocryphal Gospels do mention them. Not forgetting Isaiah 1:3, which has another meaning.
Let us think that the donkey represents those cattle that cannot rise from the ground as the birds (Adam) can; that is, the donkey would represent the Eves, deaf at the complete mercy of idols, snakes, demons and so on. The ox, with horns would represent the demons, not Satan, but in general.

The three wise men from the east (3) symbolise the third person of God, the Holy Spirit (east, where the sun rises). They bring the endowments or gifts of the Spirit. In a catechesis from our land, we could say that we are the manger (or temple, the Adam) and when the child Jesus is born inside us the Holy Spirit gives us gifts (varied, different). But it symbolises something else; the Star, visible and big as no other in our firmament, is Jesus Christ in His heavenly nature, the child Jesus of course Himself, in His Man’s Nature. The Star, Jesus, is followed by the Holy Spirit (the three kings), who meet Him in His Man’s Nature and give themselves to Him as man, as Man’s Nature. Certainly, Mary is a sent from God, without stain or betrayal in heaven, she would not have to suffer the world, but she is charged with carrying the child and caring for him in the early years. I would venture to say that St. Joseph was also immaculate, before and after, he was not one of the traitors, but I don't know. And what does the Ox and the Donkey mean in relation to Jesus or to us? Simply that He becomes man in the world surrounded by demons and the Eves or fools, just like all of us, there is no distinction for Him. Let us remember that the Eves with a tendency to the world also pull the Adams down to earth.
As for:

1:3 The ox knows his owner, and the ass his master's crib. Israel does not know, my people do not discern.
Most likely it has nothing to do with the nativity scene and simply speaks of the ox (fallen ones, satan's minions) knowing its owner (satan) and the ass (the Eves), who feed on the lies of the demons (knows its master's manger).
Thus, it would not be true of the apocrypha, which seems to have been written by someone who saw the passage in Isaiah and sought a justification for it or wanted to convince the Jews with it in order to bring them to Christianity. It reads as follows:

Apocrypha. On the third day after the birth of the Lord, Mary came out of the grotto, and went into a stable, and laid the babe in the manger, and the ox and the ass worshipped him.  Then was fulfilled what the prophet Isaiah had foretold: The ox has known its owner, and the donkey its master's manger.

To begin with, being literal, this is false because the holy family did not own the ox or the manger. Rather, it seems that Isaiah in 1:3 speaks in the key studied, for Isaiah often does so.
Moreover, it correlates with what follows: "Israel does not know, my people do not discern". He is not saying, 'see how well the ox and the ass do, and how poorly my people', but he makes a point, and this first part was an argument leading into the second part:
"The ox knows his owner [Satan, a bad thing] and the ass his master's crib [also a bad thing]. Israel does not know...".
So, from the evidence, we could not say that there was an ox and a mule at the birth, though by its significance perhaps there was. Because everything happens the way God wants it to happen. Thus, that crib or that temple that represents us, without Jesus, without the Holy Family, would be lifeless and surrounded by idols (and demons, ox) and fools (donkey) leading us as happened in heaven when we emptied ourselves of God by following them. Moreover, they would eat of us, of our things (straw) which means that they have found a prolongation of time (feed) from the blackmail of heaven at the cost of emptying our inner self, or simply that they feed on our distractions and tasks of the world.
When Jesus is there, He is already the main thing, and the idols and the Eves are relegated, we still live with them in the world, they are around us, but they are no longer our centre of attention. The animals cannot come to eat from us because Mary and St. Joseph are watching over us. In this case Mary would represent herself, because she looks after us too, I feel, and St. Joseph the guardian angel who would also be attentive to scare away the ox and the mule; but for this we need the child Jesus to be born in us, because with the Holy Spirit it is indeed less easy to sin. Without Him, the beasts of the world feed on us, the world hurts us at the slightest opportunity and we have to go to confession to be cured.
On the other hand, speaking of man's nature, the three wise men (Holy Spirit), without the newborn, would never have gone to the manger to give Himself, nor to the ox and the mule; they went for Jesus, and they would not have gone if the animals (demons and Eves) were alone beside the manger, beside us (I speak of you as if you were an Adam), because for the Spirit after the betrayal, we were only a thing full of dead straw, empty and useless (useful only for the ox and the mule). And even now, if we are empty that is what we are, a place where the demons come to eat and the fools in the end too, because we are a target for them because they consider us crazy or even ignorant, what a paradox! Thus, we must empty ourselves of the world's chaff, for too much of it leaves no room for the child Jesus. We must care, first for the cradle by making preparations, then for the very Holy Spirit as a baby, which is how He takes root and grows within us; His endowments will be the gifts. It is true that the devil (Herod also here) persecutes more those who have the Spirit (follow the 3 kings), but He protects us. Still, let us keep in mind that the Spirit flees from chosen evil like a fawn, this is the meaning here of the baby.
So it makes clear sense following the clues, but I don't think Isaiah was speaking of the birth of Jesus there, even though in both the Isaiah 1:3 and Bethlehem, ox and donkey represent the same, as they do in many other places in the Bible when God uses His key. Isaiah will speak of the birth of Jesus later.

 

Let us now consider the gifts brought by the Magi: gold, frankincense, and myrrh.

These represent the Holy Trinity. They may also represent particular characteristics of Jesus, as I have seen on the internet, but I am inclined to think more of the Trinity.

∎Gold clearly represents God the Father.

∎I believe frankincense represents the Holy Spirit; it was used to honour “the gods”. in the Catholic Church it is used to ‘symbolise the prayers of the faithful rising up to God, to purify the environment and the people, to honour the altar and the Gospel, and to create an atmosphere of mystery, reverence and solemnity, recalling the presence of Christ and the fragrance of his love’, says the AI.
In any case, representing something sacred, we know it as smoke that enters us through the nose and mouth. For me, it represents the Holy Spirit. On the other hand, incense comes from resins mixed with oil. And isn't resin condensed tree sap? It is true that sap is not the same as resin, but isn't resin formed when sap condenses? (Just as our blood condenses with platelets to close a wound). I say this because I have already used this example elsewhere, comparing the sap of a tree to the Holy Spirit flowing through all the branches and leaves. Through the one tree that is God (with us as its leaves, and the branches as the different powers, all hierarchical, all with sizes).

∎ Myrrh is also a resin, but in a gummy state. It was used for healing (it is antiseptic and anti-inflammatory) and (crucially) for embalming the dead. And what is Jesus Christ if not the one who heals our wounds and prepares our bodies, then dead and without the Holy Spirit, for eternal life in the hereafter? Because that is why they embalmed bodies: to preserve them and facilitate the eternal life of the soul in the hereafter.

So it is different to think that the three gifts represent Jesus Christ than to think that only myrrh does. Although in fact, myrrh as a resin also represents the Holy Spirit in some way. And it is the Holy Spirit flowing in maximum intensity that makes Him the person of God, and this is so because the Holy Spirit is the very Essence of God. But Jesus is not Gold, He is not God the Father. He contains the Holy Spirit in maximum intensity, just as myrrh is also a resin, yet it is different from incense. They are different things, just as they are different persons. It is the Holy Spirit who confers Divinity on Jesus Christ. And it is that Essence of God, God Himself, who dwells within Him, who merges with Him, just as it is God who dwells within us when the Holy Spirit is with us. Likewise (allowing for the differences), in the same way because Jesus, like us, was created. The enormous difference is that we only harbour a tiny part of the Holy Spirit in comparison with Him and with the Father. It is not so difficult; it is difficult to think of God as infinite, timeless, because that does not fit in our heads, but it is not so difficult to think of the Persons of God because in some way (and again, keeping in mind the infinite distances) we become little persons of God when He, the Holy Spirit, merges with us. That is when the evils of the world are relegated to the background; they no longer destroy us. Neither illness nor the aggression of others. We are different.

Do you not realise that the reason Jesus was sent to save us is that He was the first of all created beings? Only He, as a created being, could validate a new nature also created by God. Only He who pleased God the Father and thus validated the heavenly nature could justly validate a new nature by pleasing God the Father and, above all, the Holy Spirit. Do you not see that if He could have done it another way, God would not have sent His beloved Son? Or do you still think that it was to obey because someone named Adam disobeyed? Every time you think that about God (just thinking it, worse when you say it or teach it), you brand Him as cruel, unjust, sadistic; and not only with us, the ‘offspring’ of Adam and Eve (according to your thinking), but with Jesus Christ Himself, with His beloved Son. It was not a matter of one disobeying, it was that we became corrupt and that Holy Spirit (who has his own way of being and cannot coexist with sin even though God the Father insists on sending him to us) left us.

And tell me, if I were a king with many soldiers obeying me, and one of them disobeyed me and embarrassed me, would I not send another of my soldiers to obey me and cleanse that dishonour from my house? I might send a good soldier about whom I have heard good reports; perhaps I might send an officer, even a general if you like, because in the end they are all part of my army. But would I send my beloved Son when He is not a soldier? Only a soldier can cleanse the honour of the army for another soldier who has disobeyed, because if I send someone who is not a soldier, anyone would say: Ah, of course, he has sent this one because his soldiers are worthless, useless. His army is a sham. And on the other hand, would I send my beloved son, my spoilt son, the apple of my eye, the prince, to suffer for that soldier when I can send any of my angels? And if you think it wasn't a soldier who was at fault, you make it even easier for me. Am I going to send my son to fix the mess made by one of my subjects, one of my citizens, a beggar who wanders naked among the trees? No, I will send one of my faithful angels, and with him I will save him just the same.

In other words, if I am going to repair a broken window, I can use different materials, even change their shape to fix it, but I will never use myself as material to fill the hole. Jesus Christ, the first of all creation, takes on the new nature created to save us. Or do you think that God the Father could have become man to save us? No. No one has ever seen God the Father. In fact, in the Old Testament, people were afraid that God would appear because they would die if they looked at Him. And God the Father cannot cease to be for even an instant. Not even on the cross when the Holy Spirit leaves Jesus to be tested alone as a man (My God, why have you forsaken me?), nor in Jesus' youth (if his baptism by John symbolises the coming of the Holy Spirit to Jesus). The Holy Spirit sustains the Father, and the Father sustains the Holy Spirit. Just as we cannot live without blood, God the Father cannot live without His Essence, He cannot be without the Holy Spirit for even an instant, because God is the One who Is. Likewise, blood needs a living body to sustain itself, otherwise it spills out. Thus, Jesus Christ is the Son because He is created by God the Father, and He is a Person of God because the Essence of God or the Holy Spirit flows through Him with maximum intensity. The creed says that Jesus is begotten, not created, and on the other hand, the Bible (John 1:9-13) says that those who believe in God are not born of blood, nor of the desire of the flesh, nor of the desire of man, but are begotten by God. Does it not seem clear, then, that it is the Holy Spirit who begets us in God? That with the Holy Spirit within us, the Essence of God flows through us, and that is when we are children of God? Being created, we are begotten and we are children of God. That's it.

Thus, in Jesus Christ, these two questions are resolved. The first (only a soldier can save the honour of another soldier) is that Jesus is indeed created like us. We are equal in creation; we are from the same army. The second question (why send His Son and not an angel) you already know because I have told it many times. He could not send an angel because Jesus was the first created being to validate the heavenly nature; it had to be Him who validated the new nature. When the rebellious angels rose up, [we the Adams (who were convinced by others we loved—the Eves), the Eves (who coveted, convinced by the demons), and the demons themselves (who were the covetous ones who rose up and hated because they could not possess as much of God's Essence as the Father and the Firstborn)], God wanted to save at least those who betrayed out of love, the Adams, but the demons asked for the same fate, claiming that they were as treacherous as them. God can only save us by creating a new nature that separates us from the justice that destroyed us in our original heavenly nature. Thus, we can never return to that original heavenly nature, and likewise, demons have also been condemned to lose it (that is the justice that makes us equal). However, God can create, and does create, a new nature independent of the previous one, and He gives it to whomever He wants. But in order for it to be independent and able to contain Life (the Holy Spirit), only the first of those created, the one who validated the heavenly nature, could validate the new nature (and only with Love, as He validated the first). These two natures hang from Christ as two ropes would. If three people hanging from the first string try to burn it (one with a lighter, another who encourages him, and the third who does not raise the alarm out of love for the second), and you decide to throw out the one with the lighter, but he accuses you of being unfair because, according to him, everyone has participated, then you, who cannot be unfair because otherwise you would explode inside (due to your DNA), can throw the three off the rope and hang a second one from the same axis but independent of the first for the less guilty. However, you could not tie another rope to the first one for the two least guilty because that would be cheating. The one with the lighter would still say to you: you are throwing me out but not them.

Everything is just, everything is logical. There is no need to cloud the mind with meaningless acts of faith. If necessary, I would be the first to blindfold myself in the name of faith, but it is not necessary. It is curious that those in the world are blind to the Word of God, and you cloud your reason in the name of faith. For today, God can be seen from the world; reason and faith go hand in hand. Because what is set out in the essay has not been revealed by an enlightened prophet with a shining and dazzling face, it was all written in the Bible thousands of years ago. There is no excuse for you to ignore the will of God, who today addresses pastors with direct orders from the Holy Bible. Pastors, you are like a soldier who receives a written dispatch from his general and ignores it. What will become of you then?

18 January 2026 Not so different. (21/01 I also add the point about Islam to the essay God for Dummies and Smart People).

After one of the last comments, I was thinking about the Suras of the Quran that say:

Sura 4:157. And for saying, “We have killed the Anointed One, Jesus, son of Mary, the messenger of God,” when they did not kill him or crucify him, but it appeared so to them. Those who disagree about him are in doubt. They have no knowledge of him, they follow only conjecture. But they did not kill him, (158). God raised him up to Himself. God is powerful, wise..

I said then that Jesus' perfect Garments were taken from Him before the cross, symbolising that the Holy Spirit was taken from Him, for otherwise He would have validated human nature with God's help, thereby destroying the principle of Justice. It is in these circumstances that he says, ‘Father, why have you forsaken me?’ And at that moment, what would the Pharisees surrounding him think, or the demons who were surely there watching? The former would think that all his talk about life after death was a sham, and the demons would think that Jesus had hated his torturers and that is why the Holy Spirit had forsaken him. In other words, Jesus had truly died as he was, and human nature was not validated. The demons could continue to hide behind us, demanding our same fate (for they say that we all betrayed each equally in heaven when we all had the same nature, and that we deserve it).

But that was not the case, or so it seemed to them, because before he died, he forgave his torturers and with that Love he validated human nature, all men, to receive the Holy Spirit. And that was when God took him to Himself. What does this mean? That the Holy Spirit returned to Him. Thus, we are begotten in God when we harbour the Holy Spirit. You know, there are many of us who can hold the Holy Spirit at the same time throughout the world, and there is only one God. That is what it means to ‘take him to Himself’, that the Spirit flooded him again (in Jesus the Holy Spirit is at its maximum intensity, that of the Father, for He is at the Source, not like us).

And this fits with the readings from Isaiah that we saw:

Isaiah 26:14.19 (14) The dead shall not live, the shadows shall not rise,
for you have judged them and destroyed them, and made their memory perish. …
(19) Your dead shall live! With my dead body they shall rise again! Awake and sing joyfully, inhabitants of the dust! For your dew is the dew of light, the earth shall give birth to the shadows.. 

These dead are us. In verse 14, we die or are emptied of the Holy Spirit when we betray God in heaven. In 19, it refers to the moment when Jesus validates human nature and we can all receive the Holy Spirit again (all of us, of any religion guided by mercy, for we are called to be like God: merciful and compassionate. We are called to love).

Of course, in these Suras, the Prophet Muhammad rejects even our symbol, the cross. And so it must be, in order to keep our paths separate, for they are paths laid down by God for different nations, for different sizes of soul, since we are different from the moment we were created in heaven.

And do you not see anything in common with us? Between both religions? That God speaks in secret in a similar way, giving the same message. It was hidden from us that Jesus had the Holy Spirit taken away from him, because this way of referring to the Holy Spirit in the Bible as Water, Garments, Oil, Gold, is actually a hidden way of talking about God. But if we do not delve deeper, some may be left with the erroneous message that Jesus repented at the last moment, for example, when this was not the case. Withdrawing the Holy Spirit was necessary because otherwise the creation of the world, the universe, and us as human beings would have been pointless. Human nature would not have been justified or validated, and for that reason it would have been better to have perished in our heavenly nature after our betrayal in heaven. So, think of Islam as having much more in common with us than it seems. It is true that the Prophet Muhammad's words in some verses may seem radical to us, but God provides what is necessary for each nation. He was sent to convert all those pre-Islamic cults with customs as savage as killing their children so as not to go hungry, and in the wars of those times there were no Geneva Conventions or anything similar to regulate battles. The problem many Muslims have is that they have become imbued with or immersed in the context of war in which the Qur'an was written, and they forget that God, Allah, is merciful and compassionate, and that is what we are all called to be. Their hearts are at war, many of them filled with hatred, which is incompatible with God.

Well, I am explaining this because I have updated and finished, I think, the section on Islam in the essay. It is also uploaded in PDF format and I will update it in the virtual book. Also, I would like to point out that on Amazon UK, for some reason, setting the lowest possible price gives the author a profit (It doesn't matter because nobody buys from there, -and this happens in God for Dummies, where I haven't included the Point of Islam yet-). The same thing generally happens with e-books sold on Amazon (worldwide, I don't know why they do it this way either). In any case, all the free formats are here. I'm clarifying this because I've always said that I don't make any money from it, and for now that's true because no one has bought e-books, or books from the UK, but you know, it's better to be clear about things.

 

29 January 2026 The Pope, Saint Malachy and Nostradamus.

Well, I know that most of us don't care about any of this, but I would like to give it some importance because it supports everything I have said, and in fact, in my opinion, it will happen as they say. Why? Because Saint Malachy uses 111, which we know is the number of God; you may think that this man came to the same conclusion, and that influenced his predictions, but I know that this is how God speaks in a hidden way. Furthermore, it coincides with the fact that the knowledge of God has been revealed here and now it only remains to be spread, the final condition for the end of time. This, together with many other indications, makes me believe in the truth of what Malachy said.

For him, the last Pope was Francis, and now that we have Leo, many, especially slaves to the world, breathed a sigh of relief. However, as I have already said elsewhere, if the new Pope recognises what is revealed in the Bible, the Catholic Church would cease to be what it is and become a Church open to the world, to all paths. A place where everyone could go, even while following their own paths, with their own churches or mosques or whatever they call their temples. Protestants would also go there, and it would no longer be the Catholic Church as we know it, but the Church of all. It would be a meeting point for all religions; it would not be above any of them, but we would all find ourselves in the Catholic Church. The Catholic Church would cease to exist and become something else, something superior, because what has been revealed here is very serious. It is true that the foundations remain, but how different everything is now from what we thought it was.

So, with Francis, everyday Church life came to an end and preparations began for leaving this world. It is time to sing a new song, as the Psalms say.

And what does this have to do with Nostradamus?

Well, he seems to have prophesied that after a black Pope, Rome would be destroyed, followed by the world (and it seems he has been right about some things before). From what I have seen, everyone linked these two events, that of Saint Malachy and Nostradamus' black Pope, speculating about a Jesuit in a black cassock (Francis), but if these prophecies are true, they may well refer to different popes. The first, that of Saint Malachy, as I have already explained, to Francis, and the second, that of Nostradamus, to the current Pope. Why? Because Pope Leo

He may be black because he was different, and just as white designates the Popes, this one, by echoing what was revealed and thus teaching it to his flock, would be different from the others, so much so that he would be called the black Pope, because what was revealed here is serious, as I said, and the changes that will take place for the good of the world are serious. He is not black because he is evil, he is black because he is different.

The other option is the bad one. If the Pope ignores what has been revealed, I assure you that God will spread this knowledge without you. Just as a great waterspout can destroy dykes and even dams if no measures are taken, so too will the structure of the Catholic Church be destroyed, and it will not be the gates of Hades that prevail over the Church, but God Himself who will break down the gates so that the air and the Holy Spirit may flow freely throughout the world, because today you are knowingly holding it back (perhaps this is what is meant by the destruction of Rome). Can you imagine if the Protestants took the lead on this? The Catholic Church (at least its structure) would be left in ruins. If it is already difficult to keep believers from the temptations of the world, imagine if others came along with the truth as seen from the world as well. Nothing would happen because God is merciful, and even without the structure of the Catholic Church, we would still be the Church, but I suspect that God's plans are for our Holy Mother Church to guide us in the revelation of this knowledge.

How easy it would be for Protestants to use what has been revealed to their advantage. They would only have to say: Catholics confused the sinlessness of Mary, the mother of Jesus, when she was in heaven (since she did not stray like the rest of us), with her virginity on earth. We Protestants confirm her sinlessness in heaven, for there we all live as has been demonstrated in this revealed knowledge... but at the same time, all this proves us right in what we thought of her on earth.

If they are the ones who show the world what has been discovered, even though they believe in the same God as us, as Muslims, as Jews... those rules or norms necessary to reach God will change for all Christians who follow them. Since each norm requires an effort to be fulfilled and this effort is the result of our decision or free choice between God and the world, they will ultimately be watered down. Perhaps all those who could have been Catholics (like the rest of the Protestants) do not have enough Holy Spirit to reach God and will have to go through the suffering of purgatory, if they ever get there. It is true that we are very similar, but they are more permissive on several issues.

As for the Virginity of the Virgin on earth, I have no doubt. God does what He wants when He wants, and of course He performs miracles; He does not leave everything to chance. I can attest to this, and I believe that anyone who examines their own history could do the same. Imagine if the Lord had not intervened and Mary's child had been born deaf or mute or with some other disability. Do you think everything would have been the same? And do you think that God the Father did not take care that nothing serious happened to Jesus until the moment of his passion? He will not let your foot stumble, or something like that, says a Scripture. What is more difficult to do, to make a few thousand loaves of bread appear or to make an embryo less than a millimetre long appear in Mary's womb? Perhaps they do not believe in Jesus' miracles either... God created the universe, and is He not capable of placing a millimetre-long embryo in Mary's womb? He has reflected many things from heaven in the world, as we have already seen, and all so that we may understand; Mary is immaculate in Heaven and on Earth. In fact, knowing that Mary is immaculate on earth has helped me to unravel the mystery as I researched and draw parallels between the innocent, the traitors and the traitors for love; this may or may not be important.

And so, if the Catholic Church ignores the Scriptures, what is revealed in them, what will happen? That Pope Leo would indeed be the Black Pope, a Pope cursed by God, and his title would come from hiding or obscuring the Word of God from the world, and from bringing about the end of the Catholic Church, ‘the destruction of Rome’.
Anyway, this about the Protestants was just an example. The truth is that whatever decision Pope Leo makes, he will be the Black Pope.

[10 February 2026 & 12 February 2026] The Importance of the Law

From today's Office of Readings:

Galatians 2:11-3:14  (11) … (15) We are Jews by birth, not sinners from among the Gentiles.  (16)  But knowing that man is not justified by the works of the law, but by faith in Jesus Christ, we too have believed in Christ Jesus, to be justified by the faith of Christ and not by the works of the law. For by the works of the law no one will be justified.  (17)  But if, while seeking to be justified in Christ, we ourselves also are found to be sinners, what shall we say? Shall Christ then be a minister of sin? By no means!  (18)  For if I rebuild what I tore down, I prove myself to be a transgressor.  (19)  For through the law I died to the law, so that I might live to God. I am crucified with Christ;  (20) I live, but it is no longer I who live, it is Christ who lives in me. And my life now in the flesh, I live by faith in the Son of God, who loved me and gave himself for me.  (21)  I do not nullify the grace of God; but if justification is through the law, Christ died in vain.
Gal 3:1-14 Oh, foolish Galatians! Who has bewitched you, before whose eyes Christ was publicly portrayed as crucified?  (2)  I would like to learn just one thing from you: did you receive the Spirit by the works of the law, or by hearing with faith?  (3)  Are you so foolish? Did you begin by the Spirit and now end by the flesh?  (4)  Have you experienced so much in vain? And if it was in vain...  (5)  Let us see: does the one who gives you the Spirit and works miracles among you do so by the works of the law or by hearing with faith?  (6)  Just as Abraham believed God, and it was credited to him as righteousness.  (7)  Recognise, then, that the children of Abraham are those of faith.  (8)  For the Scripture, foreseeing that God would justify the Gentiles by faith, preached the gospel beforehand to Abraham, saying, “All nations shall be blessed in you”.  (9)  So then, those who live by faith are blessed with Abraham the faithful.  (10)  But those who live by the works of the law are under a curse, for it is written, “Cursed is everyone who does not abide by all things written in the book of the law, keeping them”.  (11)  It is clear that no one is justified by the law, for the righteous shall live by faith; (12) but the law does not proceed from faith, but whoever fulfils them shall live by them. 
(13) Christ redeemed us from the curse of the law by becoming a curse for us, for it is written: “Cursed is everyone who is hung on a tree”; (14) and this was to enable the blessing of Abraham to come to the Gentiles in Christ Jesus, so that we might receive the promise of the Spirit through faith.

This letter, which St. Paul begins by writing about circumcision, speaks to us of the death of the law. Let us think about what laws he is talking about. We know that the Jews had and still have more than 600 laws. Some referred to livestock, for example, there is one in the Old Testament that said something like if you kill someone else's donkey (or beast), you have to compensate them in some way (I don't remember exactly). Well, this is a rule that could well be dictated by a local council, and these are rules of coexistence. Circumcision in fact has nothing to do with God and his mercy, nor with love of one's neighbour. It is therefore an empty law, and in effect dead for Christians.

But we must not take the letter out of its context. The commandments of God's law do justify, for most of them are based on love, or if you will, they sustain man's love so that he may fulfil it, even if it does not come from his heart.

Tell me, who justified all those who lived before Jesus Christ; all those whom Jesus Christ brought down after the Passion (when he descended into Sheol), when human nature was already able to maintain the Holy Spirit? Of course they were saved thanks to Jesus, but the justice was theirs. They did not have faith in Jesus Christ; some may not even have had faith in God, but they were just with others and that is why they were saved.

Thus, when the works of the law are works of justice and love, they do justify (16). For the first commandments of the law command us: You shall love your neighbour as yourself and God above all else.

In 17-18, Paul realises the contradiction because after saying that whoever has faith in Christ is justified, he then says that even if you have faith in Christ, you can still sin and therefore be a transgressor, which implicitly means that you are no longer justified; in other words, works are above faith, or in any case they are equal and inseparable.

I also do not quite understand:  (19) For I have died to the law through the law, so that I might live for God. I would understand if he said that the law is a means to reach God, although not a guarantee of arrival, but to say that ‘I have died to the law through the law’ is to say that the law has taken him to a higher or better place (through the law), where he no longer needs the law. It is like using a ladder to reach a place and then throwing it away because you no longer need it, which would be the same as saying ‘the law is a means to reach God’.

It is important to analyse the last argument that seems to hold everything together:

(21) I do not nullify the grace of God; but if justification is through the law, Christ died in vain.

Well, Saint Paul did not know what we know now: the reason why Jesus died on the cross. He validates our new nature as human beings as capable of receiving the Holy Spirit, since our old nature was condemned by justice. He himself justifies all humanity, and it is not necessary to believe in Him to enjoy that justification.

Another argument he uses to support the idea that the Spirit does not come through works, but through listening, is this:

(3.6) Just like Abraham: he believed God, and it was credited to him as righteousness.

But here Paul forgets that God waited until the last moment, when he was about to kill his son, to stop him. Do you think God is sadistic and wanted to make him suffer? If he was already climbing the mountain, if he already believed, why wait for the work to be done? Because faith without works will sooner or later die or be condemned (look at how much faith the demons have and had as angels before they fell, and why did they fall? Because of their works). If Paul says that the law is dead, I say the opposite. Works (or keeping the law) are a means to reach God, and a means to sustain Him in us when we have found Him. The key is that Paul was not talking about the commandments, but about many of the rules of the Jews.

As for what he argues here:

(11) That no one is justified by the law is evident, for the righteous shall live by faith. 

I would ask myself: who is righteous? Is it not the one who obeys the commandments of God's law who is righteous, or rather, can the one who (roughly speaking) does not obey them be righteous? Was it not for the righteous who died before Jesus Christ that Jesus descended into Sheol? And was it not precisely because they were righteous? Then Life can come just by being righteous without the need for faith, so this argument is not decisive either.

And yes, it is true that the Spirit can come to you when you hear a sermon or at Mass, but it can also come to you when you are alone thinking about all that the Lord has done for you, for example. Also when you do something for someone else; I have experienced this and the other as well. It can come to you when you try to bring someone closer to God (you don't listen, you speak). But the Spirit does not come if you are still (except in very rare cases by God's Will). Just as the wind blows on our cheeks when we stick our faces out of the window of a moving train, we feel the Spirit through the movement of our actions, of our works. So much so that if you do nothing positive, over time the Spirit ends up leaving (perhaps because we sin without even realising it).

What do Christians think of the commandments of the Church? That they are a dead law? No. They are a means to reach God. I believe that we should not take this word of Paul out of context, for he was not referring to the commandments but to all those laws or rather rules to which, as a Jew or former Jew, he was accustomed (washing every time you enter the house or praying before eating an olive – I am unfamiliar with Jewish laws). But if the law were dead, why does Christ protect it by saying this?

‘So whoever breaks one of these least commandments, and teaches men so, shall be called least in the kingdom of heaven; but whoever does them and teaches them, he shall be called great in the kingdom of heaven.’

The law is important because obeying it shows that we have chosen to adhere to God. The greater the effort we make to keep the law, the stronger our choice. And this effort is greater if you lack the Holy Spirit, and at the same time it is what draws His attention; it is the movement of that train pushing the wind.

If we already have the Holy Spirit, the effort is softened, so He impels us to do greater things, of greater scope or greater effort, if you will, because if not, He ends up leaving. He is Life, Restless Life, Fiery Life, Active Life. And once you have the Holy Spirit, you cannot say that what helped you reach Him is no longer valid (through the law I have died to the law). If understanding a lesson is the important thing about taking a class, you cannot suggest that once you have understood what the teachers explained to you, they are no longer useful to others. For it is true, when you have the Holy Spirit, everything is seen from above, you understand the efforts you made, and now everything comes much easier to you, but there are others who find it harder to understand the lesson; leave them with the law until they understand.

[12 February] I continue with yesterday's and today's office work.

Galatians 3:15-29  Brothers, let me explain this in human terms: even among men, no one annuls or adds anything to a properly made will.  (16)  Now the promises were made to Abraham and his offspring. It does not say, “and to descendants”, as if referring to many, but to one, “and to your offspring”, that is, to Christ.  (17)  And I say, a will that has been duly made by God cannot be annulled by the law, which came four hundred and thirty years later, so that the promise is annulled.  (18)  For if the inheritance depended on the law, it would no longer come from the promise, and yet God granted Abraham his favour in the form of a promise.  (19)  Then why the law? It was added because of transgressions until the offspring to whom the promise was made arrived, promulgated by angels and with the intervention of a mediator.  (20)  Now when there is only one, there is no mediator, and God is one.  (21)  Does this mean that the law is opposed to God's promises? Not at all! If we had been given a law that could give life, then righteousness would indeed come from the law.  (22)  But Scripture has locked up everything under sin, so that the promise might be given  to those who believe through faith in Jesus Christ.  (23)  Before faith came, we were kept under guard by the law, waiting for the faith that was to be revealed.  (24)  So the law was our tutor until Christ came, that we might be justified by faith.  (25)  But now that faith has come, we are no longer under a tutor.  (26)  For you are all sons of God through faith in Christ Jesus.  (27)  For as many of you as were baptised into Christ have clothed yourselves with Christ.  (28)  There is neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither slave nor free, there is neither male nor female; for you are all one in Christ Jesus.  (29)  And if you are Christ's, then you are Abraham's seed, and heirs according to the promise.
Gal 4:1-7  For I say that as long as the heir is a child, he is no different from a slave, even though he owns everything;  (2)  but he is under guardians and trustees until the time set by his father.  (3)  Likewise, we too, when we were children, were enslaved to the elements of the world.  (4)  But when the fullness of time had come, God sent forth his Son, born of a woman, born under the law,  (5)  to redeem those who were under the law, so that we might receive adoption as sons.  (6) And because you are sons, God has sent the Spirit of his Son into our hearts, crying, “Abba! Father!” (7) So you are no longer a slave, but a son, and if a son, then an heir through God.
Once again, he continues with twists and turns, talking about the promise that all nations will be blessed through Abraham's offspring. Of course, as I said, Saint Paul did not know that Christ would validate all human nature as capable of receiving the Holy Spirit. Hence the statement that ‘all nations will be blessed’: this is fulfilled by all human nature, because we are all, of all religions and even without them, capable of receiving the Holy Spirit. Otherwise, it would not be fulfilled because the fact that a group of citizens of Yemen, for example, are Christian (0.?% ) does not mean that the nation is Christian (will be blessed).

And knowing this, the following writing is of no great relevance. No one says that the law nullifies this validation of human nature; rather, it is a means of attracting the Spirit.

(21)  Does the law then contradict God's promises? Not at all! If we had been given a law capable of bringing life, then righteousness would indeed come from the law. 

Nor is it the law that made us capable of receiving the Holy Spirit, but Jesus Christ by validating human nature. However, it will be our works that determine our suitability to maintain that Spirit. And yet, as I said, although the law did not give Life (the Holy Spirit) to those born before Jesus Christ, it did grant it after death to many who followed it because of the righteousness that emanates from it. I also said that a righteous person must broadly comply with the commandments (do not kill, do not lie, do not steal, honour your father and mother, - ≈ do not do to your neighbour what you do not want done to yourself ≈ -...) or, in other words, that those who comply with them are righteous, so that sooner or later (after death) they will receive that Life. Why else do you think this world exists? It was enough for Christ to validate man, so why continue? Surely the Protestants relied on this epistle to affirm that faith alone is enough and works are not necessary; surely it was another argument for separating from the Catholic Church.

I continue with today's Office:

Gal 4:8-31  But at that time, when you did not know God, you were slaves to those who by nature are not gods;  (9)  but now that you have come to know God, or rather to be known by God, how is it that you turn back again to the weak and worthless elements, to which you desire to be enslaved all over again?  (10)  You observe days, months, seasons and years;  (11)  you make me fear that my labours for you have been in vain.  (12) … (17)  The interest they show in you is not genuine; they want to turn you away from me so that you will become their followers.  (18)  It is good, however, to be the object of interest for good always, and not only when I am there with you. (19)  … (21)  Tell me, you who wish to be subject to the law: do you not hear what the law says?  (22)  For it is written that Abraham had two sons, one by a slave woman and one by a free woman;  (23)  but the son of the slave woman was born according to the flesh, and the son of the free woman by virtue of a promise.  (24)  These things are allegorical: they represent two covenants. One, that of Mount Sinai, gives birth to slavery, and is Hagar;  (25)  for Hagar signifies Mount Sinai, which is in Arabia, but corresponds to the present Jerusalem, for she is in slavery with her children.  (26)  But the Jerusalem above is free, and she is our mother.  (27)  For it is written: Rejoice, O barren one, who did not bear; break forth and cry aloud, you who did not travail; for the children of the desolate one are more numerous than those of the one who has a husband.  (28) But you, brethren, are like Isaac, children of the promise. (29) Now as then, the one born according to the flesh persecuted the one born according to the Spirit, so it is now. (30) But what does the Scripture say? Cast out the bondwoman and her son, for the son of the bondwoman shall not inherit with the son of the freewoman.  (31)  So then, brethren, we are not children of the bondwoman, but of the freewoman.

We continue with the letter to the Galatians. I am glad to know that Saint Paul also studied the scriptures in search of hidden meanings. I say this because of the allegory that for him represents the difference between the daughter of Sarah (of the promise) and Hagar (of slavery). But before that, there is something that I find somewhat troubling. He says:

(21) Tell me, you who wish to be subject to the law: do you not hear what the law says? (22) For it is written that Abraham had two sons, one by a slave woman and one by a free woman.

It seems to encompass the entire Old Testament as that law that has died for Christians, because it quotes the scripture from Genesis (that of Abraham's sons) as that law (do you not hear what the law says? – the law = this scripture). Well, perhaps there is some specific Jewish law that emanates from this text, but as it is expressed, it seems to refer to what is written in general.

And then he says, quoting Genesis:

But what does Scripture say? Cast out the slave woman and her son, for the son of the slave woman shall not inherit with the son of the free woman.

But he forgets that Abraham was saddened by this and did not want to send Hagar and Ishmael away, yet he does so because God tells him to:

Genesis 21:12-13  But God said to Abraham, ‘Do not be distressed about the lad or your servant. Listen to whatever Sarah tells you, for through Isaac your offspring will be named.  (13) I will also make a great nation of the son of the servant, because he is your offspring.’

In other words, it is not a law. It was done because God already had a plan for Hagar by virtue of the same promise He made to Abraham about his many descendants. However, Saint Paul takes it out of context, and what Sarah says seems to be referred to as a law of God (But what does Scripture say? Cast out the slave woman and her son...). Sarah's quote is:

Genesis 21:9-10 When Sarah saw the son that Hagar the Egyptian had borne to Abraham playing with her son Isaac,  (10) she said to Abraham, ‘Cast out this slave woman and her son, for the son of this slave woman shall not be heir with my son, with Isaac.’

What a character, our friend Paul. Let us not take what he wrote out of context either. He deals with Jews (in this case, he even scolds Peter for returning to or teaching customs of the old law) who continue to cling to those six hundred-odd laws, and he argues as much as he can to make them see what is important: the Holy Spirit. Which never came to anyone before Christ through the law. But this does not mean that the commandments can be discarded because they are a means of receiving the Spirit, already here on earth for many, later for others.

(4.9) … How can you return to those elements that have no efficacy or content, and want to be their slaves again as before?  (10)  You observe days, months, seasons, and years; …

According to this, are we Christians not also slaves to the law by respecting Sunday and the holy days of obligation of Holy Mother Church? (Or Muslims by respecting Friday...) The commandments of the Church also help us to receive and maintain the Holy Spirit, but they are not in themselves a guarantee of receiving Life here. However, they are a good bank in which to deposit our talents in order to receive Life or the Holy Spirit after our body dies, as Scripture says.

26 February 2026 The gates of Hades shall not prevail against the Church.

I have been thinking about how the Church can err so greatly by concealing what has been revealed. And immediately these words of Jesus came to mind:

Matthew 16:18 And I also say to you that you are Peter, and on this rock I will build my church, and the gates of Hades will not prevail against it.

But I asked myself, why did he say ‘prevail’ and not say that hell or the devil will not defeat the Church, will not destroy it, will not break it... which is more direct and clearer? Obviously because the devil has ruled the Church at times, perhaps sporadically, but he has not prevailed or endured. Well, we can identify some periods in the history of the Church where it seems that it was the devil who ruled it. Perhaps there are others that are not so clear in which it was also influenced by him.

And if this is the case, could it be that at some point in history, when a dogma of faith was promulgated, one of those that you have to swallow without thinking, the devil was messing around? I wonder about this because perhaps some of these dogmas paralyse the already immobile hierarchy of the Church when it comes to admitting what has been revealed. Because this actually happens with all certifying entities; they must always be trustworthy. If the chain of custody is broken, as in the films, when in doubt, the evidence can no longer be used. Who knows what is wrong?

For this reason, I am considering whether God allowed Protestants to take over from the Catholic Church today and spread what has been revealed here. So I have re-evaluated the main differences between them and Catholics.

∎ Can priests not marry?

And did Jesus Christ not choose some married apostles? What do we find in the Gospels that says priests should not marry? In reality, nothing directly, but there is a letter from our friend Saint Paul that recommends not being with women except for those who cannot control themselves; for these, he does recommend marriage.

1 Corinthians 7:1-40  Now concerning the matters about which you wrote, it is good for a man not to touch a woman.  (2)  Nevertheless, because of sexual immorality, let each man have his own wife, and each woman her own husband.  (3) … (6)  What I am saying is a concession, not a command.  (7)  I wish that all were as I myself am. But each has his own gift from God, one in this way and another in that way.  (8)  Nevertheless, I say to the unmarried and to widows: It is good for them to remain as I am.  (9)  But if they cannot control themselves, let them marry; it is better to marry than to burn with passion.  (10)  …  (32)  I would like you to be free from concern. The unmarried man is concerned about the Lord's affairs, how he may please the Lord.  (33)  The married man is concerned about the affairs of this world, how he may please his wife;  (34)  he is divided. The unmarried woman, like the virgin, is concerned about the Lord's affairs, how she may be holy in body and spirit. But the married woman is concerned with the things of the world, how to please her husband.  (35)  I say this for your own good, not to lay a trap for you, but to move you to what is most worthy and to assiduous dealings with the Lord, without distractions.  (36)  ... (39) A woman is bound to her husband as long as he lives; but once her husband dies, she is free to marry anyone she wishes, but only in the Lord. (40) However, she will be happier if she remains as I advise, for I too believe I have the Spirit of God.

 

In other words, Saint Paul (who was not an apostle chosen by Jesus, but to whom God revealed himself as He did to so many other saints) corrects Jesus, who chose none other than the head of the Church, Saint Peter, as a married apostle. And this did not prevent Peter from placing his life in God's hands, dedicating it entirely to Him, and even dying a martyr's death. And I insist, he was appointed head of the Church; God does nothing by chance. As for St Paul's letter, he describes what he himself said on this subject (whether to marry or not) as advice.

Matt 19:9-12 Now I say unto you, Whosoever shall put away his wife, saving for the cause of fornication, and shall marry another, committeth adultery. (10) His disciples said to him, ‘If such is the condition of a man with his wife, it is not expedient to marry.’ (11) But he said to them, "Not everyone can accept this teaching, but only those to whom it has been given.  (12) For there are eunuchs who were born that way from their mother's womb, and there are eunuchs who were made eunuchs by men, and there are eunuchs who have made themselves eunuchs for the sake of the kingdom of heaven. Let anyone accept this who can."

It should be noted here that in (9) he speaks in the present tense, ‘he who repudiates,’ as if it were customary or the norm, and in (12) ‘there are eunuchs who made themselves such for the sake of the Kingdom of Heaven,’ he speaks in the past tense. He could even be referring to himself or his cousin John the Baptist or to the hermits who separated themselves from the world in search of God, like the latter (or separate themselves, if you want to intuit a present tense here). In any case, it does not seem to be a mandatory rule, because otherwise he would never have chosen Saint Peter. On the other hand, I believe that priests do not dedicate all their time to God (regarding St Paul's letter and dedicating oneself entirely to God); they will have their free time, read the newspaper, watch a film from time to time... A hard-working married man often sees his wife for a few hours during the day, not counting the time spent sleeping, which is more or less the same for everyone.

Of course, the effort involved in renouncing a woman for God will be rewarded, as long as this does not lead you to sin in other ways. Unlike others, I believe that the effort made to get closer to God will always be rewarded by Him, but isn't the Holy Spirit what we need most? Isn't that what a priest needs most to do his job? And can't a married person have the Holy Spirit? And if they can, what difference does it make if a priest is married? Would he have less time to manage the parish? I come back to the same point: not all of a priest's time is dedicated to God, so they would also have time for their wives.

∎ Mary, Mother of God?

Mary is clearly not the mother of God the Father, nor is she the mother of God the Holy Spirit, nor is she the mother of Jesus Christ in heaven, for everything was done by Jesus Christ (thanks to Him, God the Father is the creator), and Mary was also created afterwards. We do know that Mary is the mother of Jesus Christ, man, and He is the person of God in heaven and on earth. But He is the person of God because He maintains the Holy Spirit in its maximum intensity, which is what gives Him divinity, because in creation we are like Him. In fact, we are made in the image and likeness of God in heaven because we maintain the Holy Spirit in some intensity (not in that of God, hence the likeness; if you remember, even as children we learned that a triangle whose sides are the result of multiplying or dividing the sides of another by a constant is similar to the latter). On earth, we are similar to God only since we are capable of receiving the Holy Spirit, that is, since the Passion of Jesus Christ, because in the end what matters, our soul and our person, is the same in heaven and on earth (once repaired), although since the betrayal we will always be weighed down by our body.

That being the case, imagine that a woman gives birth to a saint, but one of those saints who did not betray in heaven. I have already told you that before the Passion, God sends, or makes use of, some who did not betray in heaven and could maintain the Holy Spirit to guide his people, because before the Passion, man could not maintain it. Imagine Elijah's mother giving birth to a child filled with the Holy Spirit because he did not betray in heaven. Would we then say that this woman was the mother of God? Well, it is not the same case because Elijah's Holy Spirit was not at its maximum intensity, that of God, but in any case, to discern this question, we have gone straight to distinguishing that Holy Spirit that Elijah had; that is, we ignore the body because it is the Holy Spirit that speaks to us of God, that gives divinity. And the Holy Spirit does not come from any of the created, neither in heaven nor on earth. It emanates from God the Father. Never can a woman or an angel be the father or mother of the Holy Spirit, of God.

So, only speaking on earth and only generalising by using synecdoche (designating a whole by one of its parts) can we say that Mary is the Mother of God. That is to say, strictly speaking, it would not be correct. Although speaking from the earth and only for the earth, I do not think it is blasphemous to say so because my mother, may she rest in peace, is still my mother even though today I have the Holy Spirit and when I was born I did not.

 

∎ Is Mary a Virgin?

Well, I have already discussed this. Jesus Christ was conceived by the Holy Spirit, of that I have no doubt, but what about the rest? Was she also a Virgin during childbirth and afterwards? It is possible that the Church Fathers confused Mary's lack of sin on earth and before in heaven (since she is not a traitor like us, but was an angel of the faithful) with that untouchable and impossible virginity (without caesarean section) for human nature. It is like knowing that she was holy among saints (heaven and earth) and shouting: ‘IMMACULATE!’.

For Mary would still be the same, Immaculate, if she had lost her virginity after giving birth. She is immaculate because she did not betray heaven, or as we Christians were told earlier: she has no original sin, nor does she sin on earth.

Mat 1:19-25 Her husband Joseph, who was fair, but did not want to disgrace her, decided to repudiate her privately.  (20) This is what he had planned, when the angel of the Lord appeared to him in a dream and said: "Joseph, son of David, do not be afraid to take Mary with you because what is conceived in her is from the Holy Spirit. (21) She will give birth to a son, and you will name him Jesus,
for he will save his people from their sins." (22) All this happened to fulfill what was spoken by the Lord through the prophet: (23) See, the virgin will conceive and give birth to a son, and they will name him Immanuel, which translated means: "God with us." (24) Joseph awoke from sleep,
He did as the angel of the Lord had commanded him, and took his wife with him.  (25) And he did not know her until she gave birth to a son, and named him Jesus.

In this passage, we begin with Joseph's decision to repudiate Mary privately, but the angel appears to him to prevent this from happening and then says what is written in verses 24 and 25. Furthermore, we see that the angel tells him, “Do not be afraid to take this woman as your wife”. If Joseph's intention was not to repudiate her legally (expel her from the home, get rid of her), but to do so secretly (that is, not to share her bed—since they did not live in a palace and he could not isolate her in another house, which would also have been repudiating her in the eyes of the community), what else could the angel be referring to? He does not want him to repudiate her privately. And what would Joseph think repudiating her privately meant? Not greeting her? No. He thought of complete marital life like any other husband.

Does this change our devotion to the Virgin Mary in any way? Not at all, because she remains the holiest of saints. She remains immaculate because she is without sin in Heaven and on Earth. Or is it a sin to lie with your wife or husband when you are married before God? Have there not been married saints?

--

Well, as I said at the beginning, I am trying to discern what path the Lord will take to show the world what has been revealed here. It seems that the Catholic Church has strayed from God's Will; that is why I have considered the possibility that it may be the Protestants who spread this knowledge, and so I have played devil's advocate, and it turns out that, after all, it was not the devil I was defending (among other things, I had always thought that they did not believe in Mary's virginity during Jesus' pregnancy, when most of them do). In fact, God has surely allowed the Protestant path to replace the stagnant Catholic Church today..

And have we Catholics been wrong until now? No, because in reality there are very few differences between Catholics and Protestants. Many are conceptual ideas. The main difference, which is to their detriment, is that we know that works are necessary for faith to be alive, or rather that faith is not faith without works. But since God wants to spread this knowledge to open the ears of the deaf, of the Evas, it does not matter who He uses to do so, Christians or Protestants. In the end, once everyone is at the Banquet, God will see which of those Evas who did not have an invitation are wearing the Party Dress (the Holy Spirit).

3 April 2026 Agenda. Website updates.

I’ve updated the programme to display the digital book. The first time you load the book, it will take a little longer. In return for this inconvenience, it allows you to select text and access cross-page links directly, as well as print, since it works directly with the PDF (which saves me a lot of time). If you’re interested in the software in case you publish books, it’s on GitHub under the MIT, Apache and BSD licences (you can use and modify it, and even distribute it for free under those same licences, apparently). It originally comes from Mozilla Firefox, although a few others will have modified it. The software, without the changes to adapt it to this website, is available at: https://github.com/RaffaeleMorganti/pdf-viewer
(It seems this link isn't working. You can go to GitHub and search for TURNJS; it will show you several projects for viewing PDFs)

As you’ll see, it will ask for your permission to save the display settings on your device. It only saves that – nothing else – but this needs to be mentioned because, technically speaking, they are ‘cookies’ as information is stored on your computer. If you don’t want this, you can decline; the only thing is that it will ask you again every time you log in, as it cannot remember that you’ve declined.

Happy Easter.

16 April 2026 Where does it say that Jesus was not created by God?

For Catholics and Protestants.

You say: There is one God and three Persons. And from this you deduce that Jesus was not created by God the Father, because you think that if He had been created by Him, before doing so God was not the Trinity (one God and three Persons), but only He and His Essence, the Holy Spirit (two Persons, one God).

I don’t know where you’re getting that from. It is true that there is one God and three Persons, but stating this does not deny that Jesus was created by God the Father, because it is the Holy Spirit, who flows through Jesus with the utmost intensity, that makes Jesus a Person of God. And this is so because He created Him first, and then created in a similar way the angels and powers of heaven, but with less capacity to sustain the Holy Spirit (and this was not arbitrary; it is because closer to the source of light, more light reaches; there are places in heaven, and these cannot overlap. Jesus is at the Source). And something similar happens to us when we hold God (the Holy Spirit) within us; we are like little persons (tiny persons) of God. This likeness also extends to being children of God, and Jesus says this when speaking of ‘the Father’, by which he refers to God the Father, including us as his children (it is true that at other times he does say ‘my Father’).

Gospel of John 10:34-38
Jesus answered: Is it not written in your Law: I said, you are gods?
So it uses the word 'gods' of those people to whom the word of God was addressed -- and scripture cannot be set aside.
Yet to someone whom the Father has consecrated and sent into the world you say, 'You are blaspheming' because I said, 'I am Son of God.'
If I am not doing my Father's work, there is no need to believe me;
but if I am doing it, then even if you refuse to believe in me, at least believe in the work I do; then you will know for certain that the Father is in me and I am in the Father.
Gospel of John 14:10
Do you not believe that I am in the Father and the Father is in me? What I say to you I do not speak of my own accord: it is the Father, living in me, who is doing his works.

Gospel of John 11:25-27
Jesus said: I am the resurrection. Anyone who believes in me, even though that person dies, will live,
and whoever lives and believes in me will never die. Do you believe this?  'Yes, Lord,' she said, 'I believe that you are the Christ, the Son of God, the one who was to come into this world.'

Gospel of John 17:5
Now, Father, glorify me with that glory I had with you before ever the world existed.

All these words do not deny that Jesus was created by God; they merely affirm that He already existed before the world (and indeed before all the angels, since everything was created because He pleased God), and that He possesses a divine nature as well as a created nature. Just as we do when we have God within us, for the Holy Spirit merges with our being (until we sin and He departs). Perhaps you will say: ‘What nonsense! Us, divine nature!’ All right, perhaps only in the slightest degree, but is it not God Himself whom we carry within us when we are in His Grace? And so, at that moment, does not the Word say that we are begotten by God? Would we not be recovering part of that heavenly nature by keeping God within us?

Perhaps you deny that Jesus was created by God the Father and place him in a timeless realm, without beginning, alongside God, on the basis of these Words:

Gospel of John 20:28-29
Thomas replied, 'My Lord and my God!'
Jesus said to him: You believe because you can see me. Blessed are those who have not seen and yet believe.
Gospel of John 8:28
So Jesus said: When you have lifted up the Son of man, then you will know that I am He and that I do nothing of my own accord. What I say is what the Father has taught me;

Gospel of John 10:30
The Father and I are one.

But do we not say of ourselves, when we are empty of God, that we are dead? And is it not true that without God within me, I am nothing; but with Him, I am? Or do you think that when God says, ‘I am who I am’, He is denying us the right to ‘be’ as well? No. He is saying that He, His Essence, is the One who gives Life—to us as well. This is not something exclusive to a selfish Being. Quite the contrary: He wanted to share Life, which is why He created Jesus, who pleased Him immensely. Thanks to Jesus, He created the rest of us.

And is it not true that all of us who harbour the Holy Spirit are in communion with one another? Yes, because it is the very same principle that allows God to dwell in many people and yet be one God. For the Holy Spirit makes us different, respecting our freedom yet making us different. And that difference, that variation within ourselves, tends towards the same place in each of us, in each of us who harbour the Holy Spirit; it tends towards love and mercy. It tends towards Him, towards God. That is our communion.

As I say, nowhere does it state that Jesus was not created by God the Father (you might have guessed as much from the fact that Jesus calls him ‘Father’); on the contrary, it actually says the opposite. In today’s Office of Readings, for instance, we can read the messages to three of the seven churches.

Rev 3:14  To the angel of the church in Laodicea write: Thus says the Amen, the faithful and true Witness, the Beginning of God’s creation. … Rev 3:21  To the one who conquers I will grant to sit with me on my throne, just as I also conquered and sat down with my Father on his throne.

Jesus Christ describes himself as the beginning of God’s creation. This is to be taken literally: He is the beginning, the first. You might twist this to suggest that He is the reason why everything else was created. And although the latter is also true, that is not what He says. He says that He is the beginning, the start, the first.

And I’m not talking about John’s Words (In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was God… what beginning, if God has neither time nor beginning, but creation does?) because I’ve already discussed them a couple of times. If you’re curious, look them up.

You pastors have it all written down, yet you stubbornly choose to ignore it. You are like someone who studied a book whose reverse sides were so mouldy they were unreadable, and when they found the original book, they refused to study it in its entirety. You are even worse; you are like someone suffering from hemineglect (or unilateral spatial neglect, says our friend Google), a curious neuropsychological condition that involves failing to see half of whatever you are focusing on, for example the plate of food you are about to eat (ignoring it completely). It is not of your own volition, not in the slightest; you are incapable, and you allow many to fall into the hands of Satan because of your despicable negligence. You will pay for what you do, just as some are already paying.

19 April 2026 They cast lots for the perfect tunic.

John 19:23-24 After they had crucified Jesus, the soldiers took his clothes and made four lots, one lot for each soldier, and the tunic. The tunic was seamless, woven in one piece from top to bottom.  (24)  So they said to one another, ‘Let us not tear it, but cast lots for it to see whose it will be.’ This was to fulfil the Scripture: ‘They have divided my garments among them, and for my tunic they have cast lots.’ And this is what the soldiers did.

It has been said many times before, but I will explain it again. Garments often represent the Holy Spirit that dwells within our souls—or that we wear, if you like. Right from the start, in Genesis, we are told of this:

Gen 3:11 He replied, “Who told you that you were naked? Have you eaten from the tree I forbade you to eat from?”

Because it was when we betrayed Him in heaven that we were emptied of the Holy Spirit. It is not that we suddenly realised we had no clothes on, which is somewhat absurd, for if we put on clothes every morning, it would be for a reason (cold, modesty or whatever), and if we did not and had discovered shame through that apple, do we perhaps feel modesty about our bodies before the Omnipresent God? (Incidentally, although He is not depicted here, it says He walks on two legs; again, the Fable: ‘I heard you walking in the garden and I was afraid’). No, one hides from the light (and from the Light with a capital L) because of the sin that causes one to be emptied of God. It is that this nakedness signifies our lack of the Holy Spirit. Since in heaven we had a heavenly nature and could not be without the Holy Spirit within us, ceasing to have Him is a new state never before experienced by us: who has made you realise that you were naked? Who has made you aware of this new state? 

But let us return to the first reading. What can we deduce from it?

∎ Firstly, that Jesus’ clothes were stripped from him before the Passion began, not just at the cross. For if this had not been the case, they would have been torn to shreds after the flogging, for example. Therefore, Jesus’ suffering was at its peak throughout the entire Passion, not just at the cross.

∎ Secondly, the fact that those soldiers cast lots for the perfect tunic signifies that we, humanity, are now able to receive the Holy Spirit following Christ’s Passion (note also that the casting of lots takes place after His crucifixion, when He had already validated human nature’s capacity to receive that Holy Spirit). And whom does the winner of that casting of lots designate? The Adams. For tell me, is it not a matter of luck whether one in this world belongs to the Adams or to those who listen, bearing in mind that we remember nothing of what we did in heaven? That is why Jesus Christ says:

Luke 10:20 But do not rejoice that the spirits submit to you; rejoice that your names are written in heaven.

This distinction that Jesus makes between those whose names are written in heaven and those whose are not is a distinction between the Adams and the Eves.
[Remember: The story of Adam, Eve and the serpent is a fable that describes the betrayal of the angels in heaven, in which those who hated God because they could not be like Him (demons, the serpent…) persuaded others who coveted that Essence or stature of God (Eve), and these in turn persuaded the Adams, who agreed to rebel out of love for them (the Eves), not out of greed or hatred. Since the Eves persuaded the Adams and they fell because of ‘them’, on Earth the Eves will continue to listen to the idols of the world and will be deaf or blind to seeing God, but they will be able to see Him through the experience of the Adams. Through them they may be saved, just as the Adams were lost because of them]

It is worth noting that phrasing it this way – “your names are written in heaven” – also refers to something that has already happened and is definitive, something that was accomplished in heaven.
As we do not actually remember anything we did in heaven, for us it has been like winning the lottery to receive this ability to see God (and therefore to receive the Holy Spirit, that perfect Garment, without anyone first having to adjust our sight).

∎ Thirdly, that this Holy Spirit who can dwell within us is the same one whom Jesus holds within himself; He is God, the One and Only God (albeit not in the fullest measure). This is something so obvious that it need not be stated.

∎ Fourth, that Jesus Christ can be separated from the Holy Spirit (by the Father’s doing), which makes clear the distinction between created and Divine nature (‘My God, why have you forsaken me?’). [Let us remember: the Holy Spirit is withdrawn from Jesus to test him as a mere man, without God’s help. This was the condition for validating in justice (the justice demanded by the devil) that new nature in order to retain the Holy Spirit. Given that the devil demands our very same fate because he claims we are all traitors, God, in justice, strips us all (devils, Eves, Adams) of our heavenly nature, but creates a new nature independent of the previous justice, and as such bestows it upon whomever He chooses. Everything is always done in Justice (God cannot deny Himself); therefore, He who validated all creation in heaven (including the angels)—Jesus, the first created being who pleased God—had to validate the new nature so that no fallen angel could claim any kind of injustice. Jesus makes everything new (because what was ours in heaven—our nature—was already old and useless)].

Why am I explaining all this? For, as today’s Mass reading tells us, Jesus Christ explained all the foreshadowings in the Bible to two disciples on the road to Emmaus. In other words, it is important that we understand what the Scriptures are talking about. It is not just faith that is important; rather, understanding the Scriptures is important for our faith.

13 May 2026 The Apocalypse has truly been revealed. (*! 15 May)

As it comes at the end, it should be the last to be completed, and so it has been. There are a couple of surprises. It is incredible how the Lord is always one step ahead of us. Almost two thousand years ago, He had it written down what was going to happen. You can view it as a PDF, or by clicking here.

Let me remind you that the Holy Spirit is hovering around us, but He is like a shy girl who won’t come near unless we are constantly courting Him. As soon as we get distracted by our worldly friend, He moves away, for He is also very polite and respects our freedom. Or would your girlfriend really stay by your side if you were flirting with someone else and turning your back on her? No. It is said that God is jealous; in reality, this is because choosing Him over the world is our test. It is jealousy to save us, not selfish jealousy. That is why it is so important to engage in self-reflection almost constantly to check that the Holy Spirit is there. And to keep this ever in mind so as not to do anything that might cause us to push Him away from us.
Peace.

*! A Note of Hope. As I always do when I publish something serious, on the 13th I asked the Lord for guidance by picking a random passage.
1. I came across a passage from Solomon addressing the Jebusites, Perizzites… (I can’t recall which ones he named) saying he was going to send them into forced labour, but not the Israelites who were the generals and those in command (this is the part I pointed to). I didn’t see much sense in it because obviously he wasn’t going to send the Israelites to forced labour since they were his people, but it seemed I shouldn’t publish it if I were to compare those Israelite leaders to the Church. So, even at the risk of tempting the Lord and given that deciphering the Apocalypse had been such hard work, I consulted it again. (2) This time I came across a psalm (if I remember correctly; it was tabulated like the psalms) which basically said that Israel had false prophets who told them pleasant things so that they would not mend their ways.

The hope is that perhaps the revelation of the Apocalypse is there to correct the Vatican, and that the prediction of its future might be averted. For if I were to identify with the role of the false prophet in Scripture, then I would not warn you so that you might not correct yourselves. This is what led me to publish it.
Well then, as the Book of Revelation would say: It is done... (may God find us confessed)

[Something I didn’t mention is that, in addition to the Apocalypse, I revised the Conclusion, some letters—to the Pastors and to the Jews—and the figures of Daniel’s bear, the leopard and the beast (without major changes)].

19 May 2026 Regarding the random Words or the case of the last comment (the 13th).

First of all, I apologise for not having specified which Words were involved. Lately, I’ve been seeing less than a plaster cat, as they say round here, because I’ve had early-stage cataracts for months now and can barely see without focused light and my reading glasses. And although this affects my mood when reading the Bible, the truth is that I didn’t take note of the Words mainly because I was expecting to receive direct confirmation to publish what was revealed that day (the 13th), and as I didn’t receive it, I simply closed the Bible. However, I have looked into it and the Word of Solomon that I pointed out is:

1 Kings 9:22 But he did not impose forced labour on the Israelites, for they were his warriors, officers and commanders, his shield-bearers and the commanders of his chariots and cavalry.

The following passage, concerning the false prophets of Israel who did not warn the people, so that Israel did not reform, appears several times in the Bible in one form or another; therefore, I have not even bothered to look it up.

But I’m writing this because, as always happens to me after I’ve written something, I keep mulling it over (which is why there are so many subsequent corrections), and I’ve thought that the business of the Leaders of Israel might have something to do with the latest revelation in the Apocalypse: that the filthy Adams, or those who cannot detach themselves from the world, will not go to hell (they will not be subjected to hard labour), but will be exterminated (unlike the Eves and the demons). Which, to me, is a great revelation. And perhaps it has something to do with everything foretold about the Great City (the Vatican, filled with filthy birds – filthy Adams – after the symbolic hour preceding the end of the world).
It’s like saying, ‘OK, everything you’ve written about the Vatican is correct, but you should know that they won’t go to hell; instead, they’ll be exterminated, or at least the least repulsive among them, who might be able to reach heaven, will do so after spending a considerable number of years in purgatory… Because I do know for a fact that the late Pope Francis will spend at least 10 years in purgatory for his omission, according to the reading of 10, 100, 1000 years that I got for him and which is in a comment further back (something that really surprised me; it’s not as if I go about giving readings as if they were curses).

The greater the knowledge revealed, and the greater the number of victims you could have saved had you spread this knowledge—yet you do not—the greater your punishment will be; of this I have not the slightest doubt. That the Vatican becomes the Great Harlot, according to the Apocalypse, by serving God (with its things) and Satan (by concealing what has been revealed and leaving all those deaf to God in his hands) means that every member of the Church hierarchy is a harlot because with one hand they serve God and with the other Satan. Hence the Book of Revelation states that in the symbolic last hour of the world (right now), the Vatican will be filled with filthy birds = filthy Adams. What other place today is full of adans (birds) if not the Vatican? If they persist in their attitude, as the Apocalypse predicts, they will become, if they are not already, filthy birds (adans who will not return to heaven).

17 May 2022. Review of Genesis.


The Lord's designs are fulfilled. I've been watching it for 7 years and now I realise that it is also distributed in three 3'5 times!
The Lord gives us what we need at every moment. It is our duty to use what He provides to bring Him glory. Woe to the shepherds! A heavier burden hangs on your shoulders. ... and the CLOCK is running ... how FOOLISH and FRUITLESS it is to fight against His designs!

2 July 2022 Daniel's 3'5 Times Decoded!


What is promised is due: the 3’5 Times in Daniel are now deciphered! Lord, may I always look at your wonderful miracles with the eyes of a child, and never get used to them!
Here it is, getting bigger and bigger. I don't know how the Lord will make it all known. Maybe that is your mission. God gives us the weapons we need at every moment, for He always provides for us.
I have updated The Logic of God and God for Dummies with Daniel's new.
Peace.

To understand the summary: Adam and Eve designates us when we were in heaven. God cannot be unjust and blame us for the sin of others than us. So, 7 prophets (for the time being), Revelation and Genesis speak structured in 3 and a half times, to show what was to be hidden until near the end of the world.
1st and 2nd when we were in heaven and betrayed. 3rd on our earth and ½ after the passion of Jesus when our new man nature is validated and can receive the Spirit (not only Christians, there are 7 ways laid down by God).
Is this nonsense? It's all written thousands of years ago, but we couldn't see it.
        Eve designates those who listened to the devil and on earth will be deaf to God.
        Adam are those who betrayed for love and here they will listen to the devil.

2 August 2022 I have updated in pdfs and webs 3’5 tiempos en el Génesis (hay detalles interesantes).


I have put 3 ½ Times of Daniel after the 3.5 in Genesis because they seem clearer (for those who have no interest) than those in the Apocalypse. Now I hope not to change the structure any more (I have read a somewhat suspicious repetition in the prophet Amos praying Lauds today, but I'm not even going to look into it because I think the 3 ½ Times are laid out in the whole bible and the book would go on forever. In my opinion it is enough with what we have seen so far).
Cheer up for the VII World Congress! The Lord is ahead of us!

29 November 2022 Revised Epistle to the Romans (or in portrait format).


I think it has interesting notes on everything that has been discussed lately. I have also updated it in the book.

1 Abril 2023 Ezequiel Descifrado!


Well, indeed!!! Ezekiel also speaks using the key!!!!
It is amazing how the Lord can be so present in these last times.
And you will say: Did not Ezekiel speak of the events of history? He speaks with the language of heaven. Only after knowing the key can we understand what he was saying, and any resemblance to reality is pure coincidence. No; it is a joke, because we know that God has modified the history of Israel to draw with it our history from heaven and leave it hidden so that today it would be revealed, the clear example is the stubbornness of Pharaoh and Jacob's Ladder. Why? Because He loves us and in justice He could only do it near the end of the world since He will cut off at once and will not continue to act in the personal history of salvation of each one of us. That is our disadvantage which He adjusts or evens out with what is revealed here. It's updated in the pdfs and in the book simulator.

To understand the summary: Adam and Eve designates us when we were in heaven. God cannot be unjust and blame us for the sin of others than us. So, 7 prophets (for the time being), Revelation and Genesis speak structured in 3 and a half times, to show what was to be hidden until near the end of the world.
1st and 2nd when we were in heaven and betrayed. 3rd on our earth and ½ after the passion of Jesus when our new man nature is validated and can receive the Spirit (not only Christians, there are 7 ways laid down by God).
Is this nonsense? It's all written thousands of years ago, but we couldn't see it.
        Eve designates those who listened to the devil and on earth will be deaf to God.
        Adam are those who betrayed for love and here they will listen to the devil.

7 April 2023 Apocalypse Summarised and Updated


The apocalypse is the first part I studied. Much of the key was hidden there, however, I have realised that it is not only with this one that it is decoded but from the 3 1/2 times because Revelation was so convoluted to show us our salvation history in those 3 ½ times. It's very similar, but I think it's clearer now.
I have put summaries of the most important places where the 3 ½ Times are revealed. I have also slightly adjusted Genesis (in the drawings it was fine, some correction in the text). (Apocalypse y Genesis).
Updated already in the rest of the web. Errors corrected...there will surely be more.

To understand the summary: Adam and Eve designates us when we were in heaven. God cannot be unjust and blame us for the sin of others than us. So, 7 prophets (for the time being), Revelation and Genesis speak structured in 3 and a half times, to show what was to be hidden until near the end of the world.
1st and 2nd when we were in heaven and betrayed. 3rd on our earth and ½ after the passion of Jesus when our new man nature is validated and can receive the Spirit (not only Christians, there are 7 ways laid down by God).
Is this nonsense? It's all written thousands of years ago, but we couldn't see it.
        Eve designates those who listened to the devil and on earth will be deaf to God.
        Adam are those who betrayed for love and here they will listen to the devil.

24 April 2023 Jeremiah Deciphered!


Jeremiah also spoke with the seal of the 3 ½ times (!!!!). I don't think we realise how amazing all this is.
As the book was over 500 pages long, I have removed "Manifesto of Politics and Religion", because otherwise I would have to layout it all over again.  It turns out that after adding Jeremiah I had just passed the 500 pages, the same as those of the point on politics, so, as the Lord has taught me that with Him there are no coincidences, I decided to delete it. I think he doesn't like exacerbated patriotism, because in the end you're either looking down on other countries or thinking you're better. It is indeed good and inevitable that we like our (each other's) country, but God loves us all equally. Something similar happens to us in religion; I was asking us to open our understanding and I was doing the same thing with my country. It is updated only in pdf and in book simulator. Now also available on this page.

To understand the summary: Adam and Eve designates us when we were in heaven. God cannot be unjust and blame us for the sin of others than us. So, 7 prophets (for the time being), Revelation and Genesis speak structured in 3 and a half times, to show what was to be hidden until near the end of the world.
1st and 2nd when we were in heaven and betrayed. 3rd on our earth and ½ after the passion of Jesus when our new man nature is validated and can receive the Spirit (not only Christians, there are 7 ways laid down by God).
Is this nonsense? It's all written thousands of years ago, but we couldn't see it.
        Eve designates those who listened to the devil and on earth will be deaf to God.
        Adam are those who betrayed for love and here they will listen to the devil.

1 May 2023 Isaiah Deciphered!


OK, it is true that I put the times previously in Isaiah, but they were not structured, nor were they all marked. There have been changes. I have also made some very interesting discoveries.
We have now studied 7 Prophets that speak with the seal of the 3 ½ Times (+ the Psalms that were badly ordered and also showed our history from heaven). Do you still need more to listen?
It is updated only in pdf and in book simulator. It is also already updated on this page.

To understand the summary: Adam and Eve designates us when we were in heaven. God cannot be unjust and blame us for the sin of others than us. So, 7 prophets (for the time being), Revelation and Genesis speak structured in 3 and a half times, to show what was to be hidden until near the end of the world.
1st and 2nd when we were in heaven and betrayed. 3rd on our earth and ½ after the passion of Jesus when our new man nature is validated and can receive the Spirit (not only Christians, there are 7 ways laid down by God).
Is this nonsense? It's all written thousands of years ago, but we couldn't see it.
        Eve designates those who listened to the devil and on earth will be deaf to God.
        Adam are those who betrayed for love and here they will listen to the devil.

18 June 2023 Psalms Deciphered!


Well, it is true that I said I was not going to decipher any more prophets so as not to accustom those who have to make decisions and encourage them to make them, but this was really something unfinished that I had left unfinished with the issue of the mismatched Psalms. The truth is that I should correct it in the previous essays, we shall see. Finally, as I have no place in God's logic, I have written a mini-essay called: "Psalms from Heaven", in which I study the Orphan Psalms or without known author, and which is available in PDF and simulator book at the moment. You will see that the 3 ½ times of our salvation from heaven are not represented only once, but 12 times!!!! (is also available on the web: Psalms from Heaven
For the blind... the Colours

To understand the summary: Adam and Eve designates us when we were in heaven. God cannot be unjust and blame us for the sin of others than us. So, 7 prophets (for the time being), Revelation and Genesis speak structured in 3 and a half times, to show what was to be hidden until near the end of the world.
1st and 2nd when we were in heaven and betrayed. 3rd on our earth and ½ after the passion of Jesus when our new man nature is validated and can receive the Spirit (not only Christians, there are 7 ways laid down by God).
Is this nonsense? It's all written thousands of years ago, but we couldn't see it.
        Eve designates those who listened to the devil and on earth will be deaf to God.
        Adam are those who betrayed for love and here they will listen to the devil.

14 September 2023 Numerology. Something interesting about the relationship between the number 12 and the number 7 (corrected, again corrected)


Not that it's a big secret, but there are some interesting new things about the number 12. In this button I put the changes in the book, in the other one only comments.
I have added it to this website in the section Numerology and it is also in pdf, and as virtual book.

27 September 2023 Micah and Jesus Christ unveiled according to our history in heaven


     I put this here because it is also something unveiled and some people may not look at the comments on the other tab, which are not really important.
      So, on the page "words from heaven" you can see in the September mass readings commented on, (in the Gospel of Friday 17 September 2023 Mt 18-25-35) how Jesus Christ and Micah confirm the 3 ½ Times of our life story from heaven (and that's 10 places where this is revealed in the Bible).
     For those who investigate, as we see in Micah, it is confirmed that when you want to secretly talk about what happened in heaven:
- Jacob, Judah: represents the Adams.
- House of Israel, refers to (the Adam + the Eve).
- False prophet are the Eves, who preach a false god (the devil) to the Adams.
- Daughters of Israel (the Eves).
- Leaders of Israel / of the house of Israel, are the demons who actually end up leading (the Adams and the Eves).
     Thus, when Israel stands alone in some prophets it also includes demons; this is often seen in context although sometimes they can be confused because the Eves are the cause of condemnation of the Adams (for love of them), but the demons are the cause of condemnation of the Eves, so sometimes the demon is designated as the cause of condemnation of both and is encompassed in the term Israel, referring in a general way to the condemned/traitors.
     I think it is more or less indicated in the essays, maybe some clarification is needed somewhere regarding the inclusion of these demons in some verses, but I think that in general everything is correct.
     Finally, I would like to tell you that this unveiling (3 ½ times in Jesus Christ and in Micah), in spite of placing it in this red tab, I have not yet introduced it in the essays, but you can download them in pdf also in the same page "words from heaven". Let's see what I can balance to fit it in.

25 November 2024 A Great Sign Appeared in the Sky, Deciphered!

Then follows a great sign appeared in the sky:

Rev 12:1  And a great portent appeared in heaven, a woman clothed with the sun, with the moon under her feet, and on her head a crown of twelve stars; 2  she was with child and she cried out in her pangs of birth, in anguish for delivery. 3 And another portent appeared in heaven; behold, a great red dragon, with seven heads and ten horns, and seven diadems upon his heads. 4 His tail swept down a third of the stars of heaven, and cast them to the earth. And the dragon stood before the woman who was about to bear a child, that he might devour her child when she brought it forth; 5  she brought forth a male child, one who is to rule all the nations with a rod of iron, but her child was caught up to God and to his throne. 6 and the woman fled into the wilderness, where she has a place prepared by God, in which to be nourished for [1260] one thousand two hundred and sixty days.  [7 Now war arose in heaven, Michael and his angels fighting against the dragon; and the dragon and his angels fought, 8 but they were defeated and there was no longer any place for them in heaven. 9 And the great dragon was thrown down, that ancient serpent, who is called the Devil and Satan, the deceiver of the whole world--he was thrown down to the earth, and his angels were thrown down with him.  10 And I heard a loud voice in heaven, saying, "Now the salvation and the power and the kingdom of our God and the authority of his Christ have come, for the accuser of our brethren has been thrown down, who accuses them day and night before our God.  11 And they have conquered him by the blood of the Lamb and by the word of their testimony, for they loved not their lives even unto death.  (12)  Rejoice then, O heaven and you that dwell therein! But woe to you, O earth and sea, for the devil has come down to you in great wrath, because he knows that his time is short!"]  13 And when the dragon saw that he had been thrown down to the earth, he pursued the woman who had borne the male child.  14 But the woman was given the two wings of the great eagle that she might fly from the serpent into the wilderness, to the place where she is to be nourished for a time, and times, and half a time.  15 The serpent poured water like a river out of his mouth after the woman, to sweep her away with the flood. 16 But the earth came to the help of the woman, and the earth opened its mouth and swallowed the river which the dragon had poured from his mouth. 17 Then the dragon was angry with the woman, and went off to make war on the rest of her offspring, on those who keep the commandments of God and bear testimony to Jesus.

We end with the structure of 7 angels. And we continue to talk about the ‘birth’ of Jesus told as a story. Clothed in the ‘sun’ it seems evident, that He is Christ, the Essence of God within. The moon under her feet refers to the Adams, who will reflect the light of the sun, i.e. hear and follow (many) His word; if we look at the moon, when the earth or the world gets in the way, the sun is no longer seen or reflected. The more it crosses the earth, the less it is seen, even disappears. This happens to man who puts the things of the world before God (and again it speaks to us of the intensity of the Holy Spirit in us, again God speaks to Nature).
The Virgin is our queen and guardian, protector and most loving as a mother (remember: she does not keep the exact Essence of God, but she never emptied herself, she betrayed neither in heaven nor here below and willingly took our nature as well). The twelve stars, I suppose, are the apostles, not the tribes.
There are 3 parts to this reading. The first one from 1 to 6 inclusive. The second from 7 to 13-14 and the third from 14-15 to 17.

In the first 1-6, we are introduced to the participants in the story. On the one hand, the virgin with Jesus and on the other hand the devil. And this is a way of exposing that, after the betrayal of heaven, when the devil made his equalising blackmail (I want the same destiny as the Adams), there was no way to expel him from there, to defeat him, without taking the Adams (who betrayed for love), and it was at that moment when Christ, already in heaven, offered to validate the new nature of man. It is at this moment that the Universe or Planet Earth project begins to save us. The scriptures use this rapture or caught up to pass the story from our supposed Earth to heaven (5), when in reality we are in heaven from the beginning, but it must be kept hidden. The (6) And the woman fled into the wilderness ... to be nourished there 1,260 days, (1260 days= 3.5 years) is indicating to us that we change ‘time’, i.e. we pass into heaven. It is not exactly like the times we are studying, because this first part is a presentation that from earth would not fit (even if it was messed up), because Jesus is not caught up at birth. It is a way of telling us about that offer that unblocked the castle in which the devil had taken refuge (blackmail).

Thus, the second part follows (7-14), it is then when in heaven the definitive defeat of the demons took place (they had already been defeated, but behind this blackmail they could not be expelled). It is worth noting those accusations in (10) which are the lies and complaints that are poured out on the Adams in order to make us equal to them in their condemnation. These are a clear common denominator of the 2ndTime, and are seen especially in Psalms from Heaven. As Christ offers Himself already in heaven, we will be able, thanks to Him, to free ourselves from that righteousness which the demons claim. Thus the devil is cast down to earth in 13. This last verse together with verse 14 tells us again that we are on earth and again uses the key, it names the 3.5 Times ‘where a time and times and half a time must be nourished’. It should be noted that both verses 6 and 13 speak of the same thing, how the Virgin, who was an angel who did not commit treason, is sent to the earth, to the desert.
6 And the woman fled into the wilderness, where she has a place prepared by God, in which to be nourished for [1260] one thousand two hundred and sixty days [3.5 years].
14 But the woman was given the two wings of the great eagle that she might fly from the serpent into the wilderness, to the place where she is to be nourished for a time, and times, and half a time.
In (6) because as we said we were already in heaven, and that presentation 1-5 that coincides with the birth of Jesus is a concealment that everything takes place there. Of course there are things that happen on earth, hence the concealment, but not those cries of childbirth. The cries represent the pain of the offering of Jesus already in heaven, and of the Virgin Mary herself who volunteers to bring us the vaccine down here. It is such a pain for us that makes both of them, together with God the Father, offer themselves for that birth of Jesus as man, for our validation, our salvation.

In (15) we are already in the third part 15-17, on earth and now the passion is narrated, also in a hidden way. The dragon is the demon that vomits a river of water, the Holy Spirit; it refers to the fact that the Holy Spirit is taken away from Jesus Christ on the cross (my God, why have you forsaken me), to prove or validate the nature of man, only as man. This is an achievement of the devil, i.e., because of him Jesus Christ has to undergo the whole passion (to save us voluntarily). Christ could really have ceased to be infinite Love like the Father if He had not forgiven His torturers. The Holy Spirit would not have returned in the Highest intensity to dwell in Him. It was a very serious thing. However, He did not die in what He was, and validated man, enabling us to receive the Holy Spirit. This is described as the Earth (our nature) swallowing the Water (16). At the same time, at His death Jesus descends into hell for all the righteous who could not receive the Spirit before, which would also draw that Spirit away from Jesus returning to Him, following Him underground. Had Jesus failed when he was deprived of the Holy Spirit, of that Water, Jesus and Mary would have been swept away, and so would we all because man's nature would not have been validated.
Once we are fit, it says that, scorned, the devil has nothing more to do (because he is effectively lost), but to persecute all who are able to receive the Holy Spirit.

So to tie up a few loose ends, to emphasise that in the Lord's offering in heaven there is already great suffering. If in the prayer in the Garden of Olives, Jesus sweated blood because of the sufferings that awaited him, imagine offering to lea-ve his heavenly nature to become man. It would be part of his passion if we had known it; it would be another sorrowful mystery in the rosary. So those verses 1 & 2, speak of that painful moment (I had initially confused it with the passion). Perhaps these passages confused Luther and his people, because of the cries and the pain, but it does not refer to the birth as such but to the offering of both of them already in heaven. As an aside before I continue, I add this:

Isa 66:7Isa 66:7 Before she travailed she brought forth, before her delivery she brought forth a man. 8 Who hath heard such a thing? who hath seen such a thing? is a nation brought forth in one day? or is a people born all at once? Well then: Zion travailed, and brought forth her children. 9 Shall I open the womb without bringing forth,’ says the LORD, ’or shall I shut it, who brings forth? - says your God. 10 Rejoice, O Jerusalem, and be glad for her, all ye that love her, and rejoice for her, all ye that mourn for her; 11 That ye may suck and be satisfied with the bosom of her consolations, that ye may suck and be satisfied with the breasts of her glory....

Of course things are hidden with facts of the world, for example the red dragon is equated to the Roman empire (7 diadems, 7 hills), and the flight of Mary to the historical fact: Mary flees with the born Christ because Herod wanted to kill him. But this is the genius of the Lord who has kept hidden from us what was right under our noses for thousands of years. And note that the sign of heaven speaks exclusively of that half-time, of salvation through Jesus Christ, in heaven (offering) and on earth (passion), and does so with rare resources (he was taken away at birth) to conceal until today what is revealed here.
This occurs similarly in the parable of the mine (which I now put), where it is concealed that the mine takes place entirely in heaven (the 3.5 times), and the master makes a long journey to earth, in order to gain a Royal Investiture (the Holy Spirit for us, represented by vestments as so often, now to top it all off, Royal). Why did God want to hide it, and why is it being revealed now?

This reading translates the word mna (G3414 that is mina) in spanish (=digging for gold..., and coin), although several English translations put pound. Here is the Latin (and Greek) that matches the Spanish and its actual meaning

Luke 19:12 He said therefore, “A nobleman went into a far country to receive for himself a kingdom and then return. 13 Calling ten of his servants, he gave them ten mines, and said to them, ‘Engage in business until I come.’ 14 But his citizens hated him and sent a delegation after him, saying, ‘We do not want this man to reign over us.’ 15 When he returned, having received the kingdom, he ordered these servants to whom he had given the money to be called to him, that he might know what they had gained by doing business. 16 The first came before him, saying, ‘Lord, your mine has made ten mines more.’ 17 And he said to him, ‘Well done, good servant! Because you have been faithful in a very little, you shall have authority over ten cities.’ 18 And the second came, saying, ‘Lord, your mine has made five mines.’ 19 And he said to him, ‘And you are to be over five cities.’ 20 Then another came, saying, ‘Lord, here is your mine, which I kept laid away in a handkerchief; 21 for I was afraid of you, because you are a severe man. You take what you did not deposit, and reap what you did not sow.’ 22 He said to him, ‘I will condemn you with your own words, you wicked servant! You knew that I was a severe man, taking what I did not deposit and reaping what I did not sow? 23 Why then did you not put my money in the bank, and at my coming I might have collected it with interest?’ 24 And he said to those who stood by, ‘Take the mine from him, and give it to the one who has the ten mines.’ 25 And they said to him, ‘Lord, he has ten mines!’ 26 ‘I tell you that to everyone who has, more will be given, but from the one who has not, even what he has will be taken away.                               [English Standard Version]

As for Luke's parable of the mines (Luke 19,12-27), God gives a mine, referring to the opportunity (one) to replenish ourselves. This is the moment when he (Jesus) decides to go for the royal investiture, already in the decision, which brings about the creation of the universe, our second chance. It was in heaven that God laid out His plan of salvation ‘man’ after our betrayal; it was in heaven that Jesus Christ accepted or offered Himself, before the creation of the Universe. Note that when He returns again, in heaven, the others have also ended up in the mine, on earth. That period in the mine is skipped to make everything coincide before heaven and after earth, i.e. to speak to us from outside the earth. If the final judgement is in heaven, everything takes place in heaven. Thus, the far country to which the noble one (Jesus) goes is our earth. The royal investiture is our validation -man- as kings, as capable of containing God. Again (this word is studied together with others in the Conclusion of God for dummies) the word ‘mine’ has two meanings: one as a ‘power’ to be exploited (gold can be extracted from the LAND; the first), and another as coins (1 mine = 3 months' wages). The first mine is for us this opportunity, the earth, our time here, where we must find love, which later (for many already here on earth) will turn God into Holy Spirit, Kingdom of Heaven (cities). The one who returns the opportunity 'empty', without multiplying or producing, is the unfaithful servant, who keeps the soul, ultimately capable, but empty in a canvas (our skin). 'Mine' moreover, in the first meaning, symbolises a dark place into which we plunge, to extract with difficulty that precious ore; and what is the earth to a good man but that? A place surrounded by temptations and necessities for oneself, which hinder the production of that precious love, and whose prince, moreover, is the devil. It has nothing to do with the enlightened heaven; here we can inversely compare our passage from the dark womb to the 'enlightened' earth. Likewise, the word talent, speaks to us of capacity (properties, possibilities) first and then of money (Love, Holy Spirit to replenish us). The difference with the mines, is that in the talents a specific measure is specified for each of us, in the mine the opportunity won by Christ for us in the passion is highlighted, the rest is pretty much the same, because our 'work' is to get that gold or love or Holy Spirit. Indeed to have the Holy Spirit on earth already, is a Gift, is a down payment, is to have your love + faith exchanged for the Holy Spirit ahead of time. In reality, thanks to this nuance or difference between the two readings, I believe that rather than being parallel, both complement each other. Then it says, 'he will gather all nations', again I insist, it refers to all churches (religions).

13 May 2026 The Apocalypse has truly been revealed.

As it comes at the end, it should be the last to be completed, and so it has been. There are a couple of surprises. It is incredible how the Lord is always one step ahead of us. Almost two thousand years ago, He had it written down what was going to happen. You can view it as a PDF, or by clicking here.

Let me remind you that the Holy Spirit is hovering around us, but He is like a shy girl who won’t come near unless we are constantly courting Him. As soon as we get distracted by our worldly friend, He moves away, for He is also very polite and respects our freedom. Or would your girlfriend really stay by your side if you were flirting with someone else and turning your back on her? No. It is said that God is jealous; in reality, this is because choosing Him over the world is our test. It is jealousy to save us, not selfish jealousy. That is why it is so important to engage in self-reflection almost constantly to check that the Holy Spirit is there. And to keep this ever in mind so as not to do anything that might cause us to push Him away from us.
Peace.

*! A Note of Hope. As I always do when I publish something serious, on the 13th I asked the Lord for guidance by picking a random passage.
1. I came across a passage from Solomon addressing the Jebusites, Perizzites… (I can’t recall which ones he named) saying he was going to send them into forced labour, but not the Israelites who were the generals and those in command (this is the part I pointed to). I didn’t see much sense in it because obviously he wasn’t going to send the Israelites to forced labour since they were his people, but it seemed I shouldn’t publish it if I were to compare those Israelite leaders to the Church. So, even at the risk of tempting the Lord and given that deciphering the Apocalypse had been such hard work, I consulted it again. (2) This time I came across a psalm (if I remember correctly; it was tabulated like the psalms) which basically said that Israel had false prophets who told them pleasant things so that they would not mend their ways.

The hope is that perhaps the revelation of the Apocalypse is there to correct the Vatican, and that the prediction of its future might be averted. For if I were to identify with the role of the false prophet in Scripture, then I would not warn you so that you might not correct yourselves. This is what led me to publish it.
Well then, as the Book of Revelation would say: It is done... (may God find us confessed)

[Something I didn’t mention is that, in addition to the Apocalypse, I revised the Conclusion, some letters—to the Pastors and to the Jews—and the figures of Daniel’s bear, the leopard and the beast (without major changes)].